Moderator: Community Team
leolou2 wrote:dont invite me im tired of em to much luck and i have won my share but im done
leolou2 wrote:its getting old or i'm bored with it i like multi standard but 1 v 1 is pure luck of course you get in a standard game and all pick on you its not fun either sorry maybe later
Timminz wrote:If it's pure luck, wouldn't everyone win approximately 50% of their 1v1 games?
leolou2 wrote:leolou2 wrote:its getting old or i'm bored with it i like multi standard but 1 v 1 is pure luck of course you get in a standard game and all pick on you its not fun either sorry maybe later
if you cant beat em kill kill kill em
Timminz wrote:If it's pure luck, wouldn't everyone win approximately 50% of their 1v1 games?
AAFitz wrote:Pure luck indeed. I get to win 64% of them, and 75% or so on world. The dice just plain love me.
Timminz wrote:I've always considered someone a decent 1v1 player if they can win 33% of them.
*map ranks the OP*
Oooh, sorry. You only missed by 1%.
whitestazn88 wrote:Timminz wrote:I've always considered someone a decent 1v1 player if they can win 33% of them.
*map ranks the OP*
Oooh, sorry. You only missed by 1%.
wait, are you serious? 33%... i feel like thats kinda low.
map rank me just to see if i'm eating my words or not
whitestazn88 wrote:map rank me just to see if i'm eating my words or not
Timminz wrote:whitestazn88 wrote:Timminz wrote:I've always considered someone a decent 1v1 player if they can win 33% of them.
*map ranks the OP*
Oooh, sorry. You only missed by 1%.
wait, are you serious? 33%... i feel like thats kinda low.
map rank me just to see if i'm eating my words or not
Gee, you really think 33% is too low? Fine. What do you think makes a decent 1v1 player?
owenshooter wrote:whitestazn88 wrote:map rank me just to see if i'm eating my words or not
i bet you'd just love for timminz to do that to you... how old are you now? is that even legal where you live?-0
whitestazn88 wrote:Timminz wrote:whitestazn88 wrote:Timminz wrote:I've always considered someone a decent 1v1 player if they can win 33% of them.
*map ranks the OP*
Oooh, sorry. You only missed by 1%.
wait, are you serious? 33%... i feel like thats kinda low.
map rank me just to see if i'm eating my words or not
Gee, you really think 33% is too low? Fine. What do you think makes a decent 1v1 player?
it certainly depends on what type of game you're playing, but i think a percentage like 33% is sub-par, especially if you take into account random luck.
if you were playing games with similar ranks on maps that both parties are not completely new to, i'd say 40% is decent, 50% is good, 60% exceeds expectations, 70% excellent... or something like that.
Timminz wrote:whitestazn88 wrote:Timminz wrote:whitestazn88 wrote:Timminz wrote:I've always considered someone a decent 1v1 player if they can win 33% of them.
*map ranks the OP*
Oooh, sorry. You only missed by 1%.
wait, are you serious? 33%... i feel like thats kinda low.
map rank me just to see if i'm eating my words or not
Gee, you really think 33% is too low? Fine. What do you think makes a decent 1v1 player?
it certainly depends on what type of game you're playing, but i think a percentage like 33% is sub-par, especially if you take into account random luck.
if you were playing games with similar ranks on maps that both parties are not completely new to, i'd say 40% is decent, 50% is good, 60% exceeds expectations, 70% excellent... or something like that.
So, you wouldn't consider 50% to be "average"?
Timminz wrote:So, have you figured out why I picked 33%, when the OP wins 32%?
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users