Moderator: Community Team
Col. Hogan wrote:Below is the e-mail I received from Andy.
Last month you received a Warning that your next infraction would land you a lengthy vacation, and unfortunately it has. RE: your post
viewtopic.php?f=31&t=91264#p2104121
Flaming, Trolling, Off Topicing, it fits the bill. So for now, you are on a 1 Month Forum Vacation. The next stop, unfortunately, will be a Permanent Forum Vacation.
I'd hate to see you depart from the Forums forever, so lets not have it come to that.
--Andy
Regards,
The Conquer Club
Woodruff wrote:General Stoneham and I never really got along very well (different styles and all), but IF that post is really the reason he was given a 30-day ban, that appears to me to be really quite ridiculous. What was flaming about that?
4myGod wrote:Woodruff wrote:General Stoneham and I never really got along very well (different styles and all), but IF that post is really the reason he was given a 30-day ban, that appears to me to be really quite ridiculous. What was flaming about that?
I agree, that was no worse than any other post I have seen on these forums. I have personally done that several times. I bet they just don't like that avatar so they are trying to get rid of him.
Posting for Vacationed or Banned Users
* If you choose to make posts for individuals who have received a vacation or a ban, don't be surprised if you find yourself quickly joining them in paradise.
King_Herpes wrote:Must really blow chunks to know that guy in real life, but better you than us.
# Posting for Vacationed or Banned Users
* If you choose to make posts for individuals who have received a vacation or a ban, don't be surprised if you find yourself quickly joining them in paradise.
prismsaber wrote:He deserved the ban just for criticizing a much better player and when he gets the permanent variety he'll have deserved that one too for being a useless poster.
xelabale wrote:prismsaber wrote:He deserved the ban just for criticizing a much better player and when he gets the permanent variety he'll have deserved that one too for being a useless poster.
Really? What the f*ck do you know about the context of that post and their relationship? Check the game chat. Check the thread title. Then apologise.
prismsaber wrote:xelabale wrote:prismsaber wrote:He deserved the ban just for criticizing a much better player and when he gets the permanent variety he'll have deserved that one too for being a useless poster.
Really? What the f*ck do you know about the context of that post and their relationship? Check the game chat. Check the thread title. Then apologise.
You should get a ban for the same reason as that other guy.
xelabale wrote:prismsaber wrote:xelabale wrote:prismsaber wrote:He deserved the ban just for criticizing a much better player and when he gets the permanent variety he'll have deserved that one too for being a useless poster.
Really? What the f*ck do you know about the context of that post and their relationship? Check the game chat. Check the thread title. Then apologise.
You should get a ban for the same reason as that other guy.
Why? I haven't criticised a much better player, I called you on your bs - which is a far from useless post. Have you asked DAZ if he was upset? Did you even look at the title of the thread? BK was fooling around with DAZ and they were both fine with it. BK may be an annoying dick sometimes but he doesn't go round sniping at people who can't defend themselves and gloating when they're down, big man. Why'd you bother coming in this thread to gloat? Hell, it's possible you might be an annoying dick but that doesn't mean you should be banned does it?
I'm waiting for an apology.
Community Guidelines wrote:# Posting for Vacationed or Banned Users
* If you choose to make posts for individuals who have received a vacation or a ban, don't be surprised if you find yourself quickly joining them in paradise.
Mr. Squirrel wrote:pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
One fool reporting for duty!
Masli wrote:Next time colton24 read the whole topic please :Masli wrote:http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=7785# Posting for Vacationed or Banned Users
* If you choose to make posts for individuals who have received a vacation or a ban, don't be surprised if you find yourself quickly joining them in paradise.
prismsaber wrote:xelabale wrote:prismsaber wrote:xelabale wrote:prismsaber wrote:He deserved the ban just for criticizing a much better player and when he gets the permanent variety he'll have deserved that one too for being a useless poster.
Really? What the f*ck do you know about the context of that post and their relationship? Check the game chat. Check the thread title. Then apologise.
You should get a ban for the same reason as that other guy.
Why? I haven't criticised a much better player, I called you on your bs - which is a far from useless post. Have you asked DAZ if he was upset? Did you even look at the title of the thread? BK was fooling around with DAZ and they were both fine with it. BK may be an annoying dick sometimes but he doesn't go round sniping at people who can't defend themselves and gloating when they're down, big man. Why'd you bother coming in this thread to gloat? Hell, it's possible you might be an annoying dick but that doesn't mean you should be banned does it?
I'm waiting for an apology.
Basically, it comes down to this. I don't visit the forums a ton but when I do I notice all you flame war nerds out and about infesting the general board and I can't remember off the top of my head a single worthwhile post coming from any of you. Get over it.
prismsaber wrote:azezzo wrote:prismsaber wrote:kylegraves1 wrote:you would think that someone could rank up after there 100th games
I've always wondered the same thing, except the threshold I'm thinking of is 2k points and 1k games.
my my General prismsaber, talk like that and you will be considered an elitest
You starting the thread was rather elitist. I just escalated it to something that is more relative to me. Coincidentally, you fall short of the new threshold.
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users