Moderator: Community Team
4myGod wrote:t-o-m has been brought back, next on the list I believe is Dancing Mustard. So when should we expect the Dancing Mustard so we can throw him a welcome back party?
I would also like to know what the mods/admins plan on doing to correct these mistakes. Just unbanning someone isn't enough. Yeah apologies are helpful, however you guys really screw people over by randomly perma-banning.
Woodruff wrote:I'm pretty sure the perma-bans aren't random. As well, I wouldn't make the mistake of presuming that just because the administration recognizes that they made a mistake in t-o-m's case that they would even consider DM's situation to be one (never mind admit it if they did believe so).
4myGod wrote:Woodruff wrote:I'm pretty sure the perma-bans aren't random. As well, I wouldn't make the mistake of presuming that just because the administration recognizes that they made a mistake in t-o-m's case that they would even consider DM's situation to be one (never mind admit it if they did believe so).
I am keeping the discussion alive. They close 1 door and I open another. The last door they closed was t-o-m's thread, which wasn't complete, just lost focus.
Woodruff wrote:
I'm pretty sure the perma-bans aren't random.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
saxitoxin wrote:Woodruff wrote:
I'm pretty sure the perma-bans aren't random.
Agree with Woodruff on this one, gang.
I know I've mentioned before here that I served 3 years in the Felix Dzerzhinsky Watch Regiment before I emigrated so I have a little bit of experience in how the jurisprudential process works as we frequently were called to assist municipal police, especially in cases where working families faced discrimination or setbacks.
Often we undertook actions and operations, the nature of which may not have been clear or obvious to the casual observer and - in many such cases - public explanations were not possible due to the delicacy of the situation.
The case with DM may be exactly the same.
Let's have a little patience with the mods and admins, they have a tough job and are doing it well.
Thanks!
STX
(Unofficial CC Happiness Quotient Ombudsman
)
Woodruff wrote:I'm pretty sure the perma-bans aren't random.
General Mojo wrote:
First off, nobody gives a rat's ass what you did/do with your free time.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
saxitoxin wrote:Woodruff wrote:
I'm pretty sure the perma-bans aren't random.
Agree with Woodruff on this one, gang.
I know I've mentioned before here that I served 3 years in the Felix Dzerzhinsky Watch Regiment before I emigrated so I have a little bit of experience in how the jurisprudential process works as we frequently were called to assist municipal police, especially in cases where working families faced discrimination or setbacks.
Often we undertook actions and operations, the nature of which may not have been clear or obvious to the casual observer and - in many such cases - public explanations were not possible due to the delicacy of the situation.
The case with DM may be exactly the same.
Let's have a little patience with the mods and admins, they have a tough job and are doing it well.
Thanks!
STX
(Unofficial CC Happiness Quotient Ombudsman
)
mibi wrote:saxitoxin wrote:Woodruff wrote:
I'm pretty sure the perma-bans aren't random.
Agree with Woodruff on this one, gang.
I know I've mentioned before here that I served 3 years in the Felix Dzerzhinsky Watch Regiment before I emigrated so I have a little bit of experience in how the jurisprudential process works as we frequently were called to assist municipal police, especially in cases where working families faced discrimination or setbacks.
Often we undertook actions and operations, the nature of which may not have been clear or obvious to the casual observer and - in many such cases - public explanations were not possible due to the delicacy of the situation.
The case with DM may be exactly the same.
Let's have a little patience with the mods and admins, they have a tough job and are doing it well.
Thanks!
STX
(Unofficial CC Happiness Quotient Ombudsman
)
This guy speaks the truth. I like him.
Ombudsman4life!
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
Woodruff wrote:4myGod wrote:Woodruff wrote:I'm pretty sure the perma-bans aren't random. As well, I wouldn't make the mistake of presuming that just because the administration recognizes that they made a mistake in t-o-m's case that they would even consider DM's situation to be one (never mind admit it if they did believe so).
I am keeping the discussion alive. They close 1 door and I open another. The last door they closed was t-o-m's thread, which wasn't complete, just lost focus.
Calling the permabans "random" isn't going to help you state your case.
oVo wrote:According to recent events, t-o-m did not get a perma-ban.
4myGod wrote:t-o-m has been brought back, next on the list I believe is Dancing Mustard. So when should we expect the Dancing Mustard so we can throw him a welcome back party?
I would also like to know what the mods/admins plan on doing to correct these mistakes. Just unbanning someone isn't enough. Yeah apologies are helpful, however you guys really screw people over by randomly perma-banning.
PLAYER57832 wrote:4myGod wrote:t-o-m has been brought back, next on the list I believe is Dancing Mustard. So when should we expect the Dancing Mustard so we can throw him a welcome back party?
I would also like to know what the mods/admins plan on doing to correct these mistakes. Just unbanning someone isn't enough. Yeah apologies are helpful, however you guys really screw people over by randomly perma-banning.
t-o-m and Dancing Mustard were two completely different situations. The only real similarity is the timing. I don't think arguing the two are the same is really helpful.
PLAYER57832 wrote:4myGod wrote:t-o-m has been brought back, next on the list I believe is Dancing Mustard. So when should we expect the Dancing Mustard so we can throw him a welcome back party?
I would also like to know what the mods/admins plan on doing to correct these mistakes. Just unbanning someone isn't enough. Yeah apologies are helpful, however you guys really screw people over by randomly perma-banning.
t-o-m and Dancing Mustard were two completely different situations. The only real similarity is the timing. I don't think arguing the two are the same is really helpful.
e_i_pi wrote:Woodruff wrote:I'm pretty sure the perma-bans aren't random.
I'm pretty sure the dice are more random than the perma-bans
RjBeals wrote:Summertime and the livin's easy
Bradley's on the microphone with Ras-MG
All the people in the dance will agree that
we're well qualified to
represent
the LBC
saxitoxin wrote:General Mojo wrote:
First off, nobody gives a rat's ass what you did/do with your free time.
EXCUSE ME, can you please try to be a bit more respectful?
Sorry to go off on a tangent but you frankly don't know what you're talking about. You know, had the imperialists ever provoked war in Europe the WFD, the Combat Groups of the Working Class and the National Volksarmee were the first line of defense in repelling the capitalist insects who would have crawled across the Peace & Prosperity Line, in a spirit of revolutionary solidarity with the working families and farmers, of course. Despite the fact that the international banker's clique used surreptitious means to ultimately usurp power on the European continent we did an excellent job over many decades in keeping the torch of freedom lit across the whole of the eastern half of Europe.
As we used to say, "Loyalty to the popular vanguard of the revolutionary leviathan!"
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users