Regarding jonty and to a lesser extent Vio - normally I'm suspicious of someone to vote NO LYNCH because I believe a no lynch only favours the mafia since they effectively get a free kill. That being said I understand it being used a bit more in this game since we need to have an active vote at all times... and some people may prefer it to actually voting for another person. I actually see that rule being more dangerous to us later down in the game if it reaches that far since it could more easily lead to a speed lynch with very few players left... I'm hoping it doesn't come to that.
jonty125 wrote:vodean wrote:falsely claim?jonty125 wrote:vodean wrote:jonty125 wrote:samgrossy wrote:Jonty seems to be anxious to build a case against someone,
The games is going slowly, and I've seen games like this where no one says anything and the clock runs down until its too late to do anything meaningfulIron Butterfly wrote:who do you think is scummy and why?
Samgrossy, seems to be posting little and of little value.
Redhedge, a bit of bandwaggoning in the jokevote stage.
But these are pretty weak. unvote, vote no lynch until something tempts my vote to move along.
hmm... jonty wants to move the game along, but wont take any initiative. he simply votes no lynch (something most people think is scummy), and waits for other people to take action. unvote vote jonty
I'm not willing to vote for a weak case yet, I've voiced my suspicions but I don't feel they're case worthy. I'm just voitng no lynch because I have to have a vote; and if a case is made on the person who my vote is on, and I disagree with the case, they can get to L-2, before I withdraw and falsely claim.
Maybe claim unnecessarily early, is a better explanation of what I'm trying to say.
at this stage jonty almost seems to be wanting to rush towards something,.. which seems to be to avoid a hasty decision later on but we still have time so I agree that we need more discussion.. Day 1 is always difficult because we have so little to go with. What really has me concerned is that falsely claim comment. his attempt at an explanation is not extremely encouraging... it may be a scum slip or it may simply be some unfortunate terminology.
This is day 1 and we don't have much to go on... jonty seems to be the biggest possibility so far not counting inactives so for now I have to go with Major FOS on jonty for
1 - voting no lynch, (relatively minor reason)
2 - the falsely claim comment (much more of a concern to me)
minor FOS on Vio for voting no lynch