Moderator: Community Team
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
vgmmaster wrote:Nyvek wrote:@Andy
I'm not going to vote Andy because it's just a theory and there's no proof that I'm right, but he does deserve at least a FOS in my opinion.
FOS: Andy
HoussamTheGreat wrote:vgmmaster wrote:Nyvek wrote:@Andy
I'm not going to vote Andy because it's just a theory and there's no proof that I'm right, but he does deserve at least a FOS in my opinion.
FOS: Andy
Thank God. so I am not crazy. I would like to know what happened to Wicked between her post that it was a good idea to vote Andy and the post a page later where she said anyone pushing to vote andy is obviously mafia??!
The only thing in between was Andy spreading some more BS about not really being immune to lynching (suddenly) - and the valuable information he posseses that is the guarantee that we will believe him and not vote him - valuable information which of course, he cannot share for fear to expose someone!
WHY IN THE HELL ARE WE LETTING HIM SLIDE WITH THIS CRAP??
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
AndyDufresne wrote:And Houssam's quip about letting me slide with all this 'crap'...rather amusing.
AK_iceman wrote:Vote Count
- [5] reverend_kyle -- (Senfive, Wicked, Sully800, redbull, moz976)
- [2] AndyDufresne -- (Nyvek, HoussamTheGreat)
- [1] Senfive -- (reverend_kyle)
- [8] Not Voting, Everyone Else
9 Total Votes are needed for a Lynch or No Lynch
Day Deadline: 20 Feb 2007 7:56 PM GMT.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users