Moderator: Community Team
pmchugh wrote:If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
theherkman wrote:aage wrote:theherkman wrote:What would you like me to do to prove it to you?
Go read some posts. What's your group name, what's your purpose, what's your role? Or at the very least, stop pretending to be the archangel of Town.
I'm not giving our name. Our purpose is to protect the town. My role would reveal my abilities in detail. If you want non-specific backstory I can give you that. A fishing expidition would only give information to the wrong people. This is not a smart move to try and get me to give you all the information you want. Either you are an extremely stupid townie or an extremely stupid scum. Which one?
Anarkistsdream wrote:If you guys can't tell that Doom is being forced to post this drivel, you are fools...
Commander9 wrote:theherkman wrote:Sorry, Strike. I don't think you mean anything scummy by this, but our name gives away everything. I can't do it.
Wait, wait, wait... what? I'm sorry, but this doesn't make any sense - how can you giving away a name of the group give away its members, roles, etc.
aage wrote:Commander9 wrote:As for the last one, I mean, sure, a name could give away his role: say, his group name could be "The Plumbers" and that means he'd also been a plumber, but do we know what plumbers can do? Can they get info someone's house through sewers and then investigate and kill that person off?
That might be true. In that case maybe he's just ashamed of his group name. Or his group name says "Third Party Hell's Angels" or something. Or he's still lying like there's no tomorrow.
theherkman wrote:No, the group name basically says what our powers are. It's stupid. We are part of the town though. And you are assuming we have a vig in our group. We don't. There are other ways to NK. Think on this and when you realize what our group is, shut the hell up and stop asking questions about it.
FloresDelMal wrote:aage wrote:Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Aage and Violet, were you specifically told that your sister is town, or are you assuming?
Why don't you start reading? I already told you thrice we were town.
sure but you are quite reluctant to say "yes the mod said on my role pm that we both were town" please be precise as you can, same to you violet, start to say the truth if you want to keep up your townie credibility.
ga7 wrote:Public confirmation please Mr S. I have never seen an unlynchable role used that way.
aage wrote:However much I doubt we'll get that, it would really help indeed. So Mr. S, if you are into public confirmation, please elaborate on unlynchable roles.
Aaga, and violet, what is wanted is for you to make one of the following three statements:aage wrote:Please explain to me how I can be more precise than "we are town"? Is there a hidden message in there? Or might I be only telling half of the truth by saying "we are town"? Please do elaborate, please, startle me, do anything. Saying "yeah but ARE YOU TOWN?!?!" every time I say "eh we are town" isn't working.
VioIet wrote:Why, thank you.
Yes me and aage are both town aligned. We win the game when all threats to the town have been eliminated. I agree that our role is more like a mason role than a traditional sibling role. But it was squirrels choice, and our role says that we are sisters and town aligned.
I did not exactly say that I was trying to get myself lynched. I stated that I would have preferred to be lynched than another townie. I knew if Aage was lynched, we would be minus two townies now. If I had been lynched, it would have prevented the death of two townies.
VioIet wrote:So of course, I don't want myself to be lynched. But if you think of a best-worst case scenario; it's better for me to be lynched than another townie.
Also I am not attempting to waste the town's time. I actually did think that if i received enough votes for a lynch that we would go to night. And that it would give people a chance to investigate and try to get leads. I don't know for sure- but am somewhat curious what would happen if I was lynched. However I also admit it is a wasted vote if we are trying to find scum, but a useful vote to test out the theory and prevent the death of another townie. So I suggest if you want to test out the theory and see what will happen, keep the vote on me. If you want to go with another player that you think is scummy, vote them.
VioIet wrote:Day 1 yes i was actively trying to save Dazey. I don't know how this made me seem scummy. It was my second game with her, and she was completely different in this one than the last one- and I was pretty sure that she was town. I wanted to save a townie- and of course the fact that we are good friends outside of the game, plus all the real life issues definitely added some vigor to my posts.
What? How does that make any sense to you? How does forcing a bandwagon onto yourself which then fails to lynch you not reveal information about your role and out you as an unlynchable? If you are town, you clearly have not thought this through at all.VioIet wrote:I did not want anyone to know I was unlynchable, especially mafia. Aage was forced to claim, so it came out. I was trying to get a bandwagon on myself going before aage was forced to claim, because I didn't want too much information about our roles to come out.
VioIet wrote:I do suppose that it gave me a feeling of boldness. I could be a bit more ācrazyā then usual.
If you know that you can't be lynched, you feel a bit more "protected" i guess. However at the same time, I did not want anyone besides aage to know. And I figured it could be a very useful ability, if i use it correctly.
aage wrote:The reason I am assuming we don't go into night phase is because in e.g. Sully's game a dead player was lynched and the day kept on going. Since dead players are also unlynchable I figured it'd go the same this game. Might be slightly farfetched logic, but it's what I am assuming.
FloresDelMal wrote:hats off to the single most scummiest, far fetched, logically flawed and plain ridiculous statement i have read on this game so far, and believe me, i have read a few.
Tsk tsk, seriously, no one else think that was fishy?
Mr. Squirrel wrote:I'm so glad I ran this game. This is hilarious to watch.
Stefunny85 wrote:
Also...Commander9 wrote:theherkman wrote:Sorry, Strike. I don't think you mean anything scummy by this, but our name gives away everything. I can't do it.
Wait, wait, wait... what? I'm sorry, but this doesn't make any sense - how can you giving away a name of the group give away its members, roles, etc.aage wrote:Commander9 wrote:As for the last one, I mean, sure, a name could give away his role: say, his group name could be "The Plumbers" and that means he'd also been a plumber, but do we know what plumbers can do? Can they get info someone's house through sewers and then investigate and kill that person off?
That might be true. In that case maybe he's just ashamed of his group name. Or his group name says "Third Party Hell's Angels" or something. Or he's still lying like there's no tomorrow.theherkman wrote:No, the group name basically says what our powers are. It's stupid. We are part of the town though. And you are assuming we have a vig in our group. We don't. There are other ways to NK. Think on this and when you realize what our group is, shut the hell up and stop asking questions about it.
I KNOW Herk SAYS he is town but something STILL to think about is maybe he doesn't want to tell you the name of his group because the group is called "THE MAFIA".
Just a thought, it's just what seems to pop out at me.
Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
naxus wrote:Stefunny85 wrote:I KNOW Herk SAYS he is town but something STILL to think about is maybe he doesn't want to tell you the name of his group because the group is called "THE MAFIA".
Just a thought, it's just what seems to pop out at me.
HAve to agree that it seems a little that way. Unless there something wierd like the "Central Agency of Rocket Power"
Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
aage wrote:Well, if you're still interested, Squirrel actually answered my pm confirming what I already suspected. The votes will be removed and the day will continue. Is it really that odd to believe that would have happened? Apparently my logic is as flawed as the Mod's is..
theherkman wrote:Because I am looking back through the last few pages and it seems like Aage might indeed be the Godfather... It is quite possible that they are both mafia and that Vio is unlynchable. Or that Vio is innocent and Aage is the Godfather. I think it would be better to err on the side of caution. If he is indeed the Godfather. I would be willing to accidentally lynch a townie if there is a chance at lynching the Godfather. What do you guys think?
theherkman wrote:theherkman wrote:Because I am looking back through the last few pages and it seems like Aage might indeed be the Godfather... It is quite possible that they are both mafia and that Vio is unlynchable. Or that Vio is innocent and Aage is the Godfather. I think it would be better to err on the side of caution. If he is indeed the Godfather. I would be willing to accidentally lynch a townie if there is a chance at lynching the Godfather. What do you guys think?
I'm sorry, I think this is very important. Why is no one responding?
Because unlike you, people don't post once an hour. You posted very recently it was only a few hours ago. It's an interesting theory, that fits in with him being bulletproof.theherkman wrote:theherkman wrote:Because I am looking back through the last few pages and it seems like Aage might indeed be the Godfather... It is quite possible that they are both mafia and that Vio is unlynchable. Or that Vio is innocent and Aage is the Godfather. I think it would be better to err on the side of caution. If he is indeed the Godfather. I would be willing to accidentally lynch a townie if there is a chance at lynching the Godfather. What do you guys think?
I'm sorry, I think this is very important. Why is no one responding?
But that in itself I think would be worth knowing.Stefunny85 wrote:I am leaning toward changing my vote but I don't know that voting a lynch on violet would REALLY tell us anything besides that she may or may not be unlynchable.
Sure, but it at least would confirm something about Vi...Iliad wrote:Guys: lynching Vi will not proving that aage is town aligned.
Neither does proving one's innonence prove the others: someone could investigate vi at night, find out she's scum but aage could claim ignorance.
But if proved to be unlynchable and pro-town, any half-wit doctor would try to protect this person. theherkman claims to be in a group with this ability.Iliad wrote:And if you think about it, why would an unlynchable person if he's town aligned try to get himself lynched. Not only would that waste a great deal's of town's time but it would also out herslef as an unlynchable and expose her to mafia, where she could've remained hidden and been more helpful to town.
aage wrote:Have we considered asking Mr.Squirrel what will happen if an unlynchable player is lynched?
I'm sending a PM.
And I think Haggis_McMutton's logic below follows beautifully...aage wrote:Well, if you're still interested, Squirrel actually answered my pm confirming what I already suspected. The votes will be removed and the day will continue. Is it really that odd to believe that would have happened? Apparently my logic is as flawed as the Mod's is..
Haggis_McMutton wrote:aage wrote:Well, if you're still interested, Squirrel actually answered my pm confirming what I already suspected. The votes will be removed and the day will continue. Is it really that odd to believe that would have happened? Apparently my logic is as flawed as the Mod's is..
Given this claim, would it not be wise to test it?
If it indeed happens as aage says, we have a bit more info(though, as has been pointed out, this of course doesn't prove anyone's innocence), if it doesn't work like that and the day ends, we have a pretty damn clear target for tomorrow.
ga7 wrote:Public confirmation please Mr S. I have never seen an unlynchable role used that way.
pmchugh wrote:If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
Users browsing this forum: No registered users