Moderator: Community Team
XenHu wrote:JESUS CHRIST! ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR FUCKING MIND?!![]()
*ahem*
That is all.
Fircoal wrote:And for the OMGUS votes. It's like a random vote, and there really is no harm to it. It's just a vote in a playfully manner. All of the votes so far have been random, besides the Xenhu Bandwagon. So what's the matter with an OMGUS vote. It's like a random one, just with out the random. It still isn't a meaningful vote. Right now that's all it is, meaningless votes, except the Xenhu Bandwagon. I'd say that they look more scummy then I do. When someone really startes acting like scum, I will start to change my vote, and go more onto them.
AK_iceman wrote:Vote Count
- [2] Machiavelli -- (Nyvek, Lt.Mustard)
- [1] autoload -- (Fircoal)
- [2] AndyDufresne -- (wicked, XenHu)
- [6] XenHu -- (dcowboys055, Machiavelli, supercram, Master Bush, HoussamTheGreat, trestain)
- [2] No Lynch -- (red bull, Senfive)
- [12] Not Voting, Everyone Else
13 Total Votes are needed for a Lynch or No Lynch
moz976 wrote:AK_iceman wrote:Wicked and moz976 raise their heads and rub their eyes.
Waking up next to Wicked nice way to wake up hehe
I agree with everyone that XenHu seems to be out of character from what I have seen in other games. I could see him as being the jester. So the question is should we lynch him to see of look for someone else to put pressure on. I am going to look through what everyone has posted again to see if there is anyone who seems to be acting more scummy than XenHu
autoload wrote:Not that it matters now, but you missed my vote on Fircoal in your last Vote Count. I unvoted him now, so the point is moot. I just know that I would like to be corrected in games I mod is all. No offense...
HoussamTheGreat wrote:moz976 wrote:AK_iceman wrote:Wicked and moz976 raise their heads and rub their eyes.
Waking up next to Wicked nice way to wake up hehe
I agree with everyone that XenHu seems to be out of character from what I have seen in other games. I could see him as being the jester. So the question is should we lynch him to see of look for someone else to put pressure on. I am going to look through what everyone has posted again to see if there is anyone who seems to be acting more scummy than XenHu
Hey Moz - buzz off!! She's mine.
As for Xenhu call me crazy but I am kind of uncomfortable giving him game-long immunity just because he claimed to be a jester!
reverend_kyle wrote:Why are we all jumping on Xenhu right now. I didn't see anything blatantly convincing, but I'd vote for him if someone could post something super convincing.
XenHu wrote:To piss people off.. C'mon, are you saying you wouldn't miss Andy?
-X
HoussamTheGreat wrote:As for Xenhu call me crazy but I am kind of uncomfortable giving him game-long immunity just because he claimed to be a jester!
wicked wrote:Joking around is fine, but it seems like you're using that as an excuse to cover up a slip?
red bull wrote:but.... i must vote no lynch to early in the game... might kill one of the good ones
Senfive wrote:I honestly have to agree with red bull on this one. Way too early on and the chances of Hittin a Pro-Townie with a power role is way too high in a 25 man game. so therefore I am going to SFOS Fircoal and Machiavelli and Houssam and Master Bush and have to Vote No Lynch
XenHu wrote:What more do you want me to say.. I fucked up with my joking..
That's all you have on me... Just jokes...
-X
Marvaddin wrote:About XenHu, I agree with these:HoussamTheGreat wrote:As for Xenhu call me crazy but I am kind of uncomfortable giving him game-long immunity just because he claimed to be a jester!wicked wrote:Joking around is fine, but it seems like you're using that as an excuse to cover up a slip?
So, vote XenHu
Beyond that, I suspect Senfive... he looks unstable, is accusing many people, while ignores what XenHu is doing... talking about others death.
I dont know anything about this Jester role, maybe someone could clarify, but if hes mafia and killing him wont give mafia scum the victory, whats the problem of killing him? We would most probably lynch a townie if no one get suspicious. So I think XenHu is the best option, at least if I didnt misunderstand the Jester thing.
I thought this was suspicious:red bull wrote:but.... i must vote no lynch to early in the game... might kill one of the good ones
It looks too innocent to me... To me it seems a try to cheat me.
No lynch? Really? And then:Senfive wrote:I honestly have to agree with red bull on this one. Way too early on and the chances of Hittin a Pro-Townie with a power role is way too high in a 25 man game. so therefore I am going to SFOS Fircoal and Machiavelli and Houssam and Master Bush and have to Vote No Lynch
4 SFOS, so serious accusations, and vote no lynch????
And supercram is also suspicious to me: he was the 1st to vote to XenHu, in page 4, if Im not wrong, unvoted under the jester excuse on page 6, then vote again to XenHu in page 6, and now, after voting to him twice, is talking about mob victim? XenHu is doing nothing to defend himself! Man, are you crazy?
autoload wrote:Marvaddin wrote:About XenHu, I agree with these:HoussamTheGreat wrote:As for Xenhu call me crazy but I am kind of uncomfortable giving him game-long immunity just because he claimed to be a jester!wicked wrote:Joking around is fine, but it seems like you're using that as an excuse to cover up a slip?
So, vote XenHu
Beyond that, I suspect Senfive... he looks unstable, is accusing many people, while ignores what XenHu is doing... talking about others death.
I dont know anything about this Jester role, maybe someone could clarify, but if hes mafia and killing him wont give mafia scum the victory, whats the problem of killing him? We would most probably lynch a townie if no one get suspicious. So I think XenHu is the best option, at least if I didnt misunderstand the Jester thing.
I thought this was suspicious:red bull wrote:but.... i must vote no lynch to early in the game... might kill one of the good ones
It looks too innocent to me... To me it seems a try to cheat me.
No lynch? Really? And then:Senfive wrote:I honestly have to agree with red bull on this one. Way too early on and the chances of Hittin a Pro-Townie with a power role is way too high in a 25 man game. so therefore I am going to SFOS Fircoal and Machiavelli and Houssam and Master Bush and have to Vote No Lynch
4 SFOS, so serious accusations, and vote no lynch????
And supercram is also suspicious to me: he was the 1st to vote to XenHu, in page 4, if Im not wrong, unvoted under the jester excuse on page 6, then vote again to XenHu in page 6, and now, after voting to him twice, is talking about mob victim? XenHu is doing nothing to defend himself! Man, are you crazy?
Wow Marv! I didn't know you had it in you! You bring up some excellent points. I was going to post about supercram's on again off again vote romance with XenHu, but it seems you beat me to it. Very suspicious on the part of supercram.
Also, it should not be a secret that I have never been a fan of the No Lynch on the first day. Most people that suggest it is new however, and don't realize what a mistake it is. red bull might be off the hook for this one, but not Senfive. As you have stated, I do not like his major FOS's of people with not even a vote to lynch one of them. I am torn on whether to vote for supercram or Senfive at the moment. I believe we, as town, in games past have put guys up for lynch pretty hastily and with sloppy reason. Odds are we will make a mistake again this game, but we have to try and do better this time.
Vote: Xenhu
If XenHu turns out to be mafia, then it should be apparent that supercram is as well for trying to protect him when the going got a little tough.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users