Super Mario Mafia - TOWN WIN!

[Aimless]

Unvote Vote Aimless because slight mistakes are a scum tell for him. Also, because I'm drunker than before.

This is not the first time I've been the first player to stick his nose out and make a serious vote. It is also not the first time I've immediately drawn fire because of it.

I am unsure what the supposed "slight mistake" was, unless you are referring to Serbia's interpretation of my post as a call to bandwagon.

[kwanton]

OMGUS much?

As for the "let's get this thing started, people" bit - I am referring only to the portion of the game in which people make serious accusations. It was never a call for a bandwagon on you; my reasoning was admittedly extremely weak; however, it is my policy to vote for the person I am most suspicious of at any given moment in time. Right now, that person happens to be you.

Well you can't just snap your fingers and say "start making real votes". usually we have to wait out this first day confusion. It may take a while without idiot players but it's just something we gotta do. In the event that we don't have a lynch target by deadline then we have freezie or serbia if we absolutely need a lynch.

[Fircoal]

AImless, you're reasoning was weak, but I feel you did the job, that you wanted to do. Start discussion. So I'll remove my tiny bit of suspicion.

[ga7]

Actually, since it's a quality line-up we can't expect anyone to make mistakes on day1. So whatever slight scum-tell one makes could be there fall. Anyway, I'll agree on voting Freezie for mere pragmatic reason if he doesn't post tomorrow.

[kalishnikov]

I haven't seen Freezie for awhile. He was replaced in the last game I played with him (CC I think).

[Serbia]

OMGUS much?

Calm down dude, not voting for you. It's day one. Nobody has anything on day 1. You did your job, as Fircoal said, you got people talking. You're doing what you do.

[kalishnikov]

Thats what Aimless does best.

He's a good player to have in the game (unless your scum).

[Koesen]

I think Aimless' OMGUS reply is a bit over the top, since Serbia didn't revenge vote him, but it's a good thing that he got everybody back to the game and away from the spam.

I don't see enough reason in Serbia's behavior to vote for him yet, but neither do I see a real case against Aimless.

In cases like these, I prefer to vote for the quiet ones, so

Vote Freezie

Show your face, say something sensible and I'll be happy to unvote.

[pancakemix]

I think Aimless' OMGUS reply is a bit over the top, since Serbia didn't revenge vote him, but it's a good thing that he got everybody back to the game and away from the spam.

I don't see enough reason in Serbia's behavior to vote for him yet, but neither do I see a real case against Aimless.

In cases like these, I prefer to vote for the quiet ones, so

Vote Freezie

Show your face, say something sensible and I'll be happy to unvote.

Voting someone who isn't on a lot for inactivity is not the best strategy. Freezie isn't on a lot, at least not that I see. And, knowing freezie, he'd have the decency to confirm.

Now if he were posting like a madman everywhere but here, I'd tackle him.

[Koesen]

Unvote

Since, well, I don't really have a case against him

[Aimless]

Voting someone who isn't on a lot for inactivity is not the best strategy. Freezie isn't on a lot, at least not that I see. And, knowing freezie, he'd have the decency to confirm.

Now if he were posting like a madman everywhere but here, I'd tackle him.

I agree with this.

I've seen too many games go south due to wasting the early days lynching n00b or submarining townies. The Departed is probably the best example.

[Aimless]

On another note... hmmm.

Unfortunately, everyone's response regarding my attack on Serbia was about as I expected it to be; so, I don't have any new places to through my suspicion. My vote stays on Serbia, despite the weakness of the case.

[freezie]

Confirm

Hey sorry, I had to replace the idiot at my job.....got me messe dup. GOna re-read and be active form now on....( I hope )

[freezie]

Unvote Vote Aimless because slight mistakes are a scum tell for him. Also, because I'm drunker than before.

This is not the first time I've been the first player to stick his nose out and make a serious vote. It is also not the first time I've immediately drawn fire because of it.

I am unsure what the supposed "slight mistake" was, unless you are referring to Serbia's interpretation of my post as a call to bandwagon.

I'll add to that: It's nto the first time aimless gets a scum on the first day because of a so called '' slight mistake''. Not the first time he screws up, either.

Vote: kwanton For saying early to vote for me because of my un-called inactiviness. Also used as a way to deflect attention from Serbia, if any of them are scum. I shall get that post soon.

[freezie]

Unvote

Vote: Serbia

For making a post for the sole reason of avoiding Nark's vote. It's not much, but it's the closest thing to a scum tell I've got.

Let's get this thing started, people.

Umm that wasn't even a blip on my scumdar. How bout the fact that freezie hasn't posted yet? I don't think it really means anything other than he's not posting but it's worse than what serbia did.

It's not much, but for a day 1, I can't think of anything more. Especially with the uber spam this thread had in the beginning.

[Fircoal]

Unvote

Vote: Serbia

For making a post for the sole reason of avoiding Nark's vote. It's not much, but it's the closest thing to a scum tell I've got.

Let's get this thing started, people.

Umm that wasn't even a blip on my scumdar. How bout the fact that freezie hasn't posted yet? I don't think it really means anything other than he's not posting but it's worse than what serbia did.

It's not much, but for a day 1, I can't think of anything more. Especially with the uber spam this thread had in the beginning.

But it's still not much. I Can see why he did it at first, but it doesn't matter much now. And compaired to other games, this is barely spamed.

[nagerous]

VOTE COUNT

Fircoal (1) mandy
Mandy (3) Minister Masket, Fircoal, AnarkistsDream
LSU Tiger Josh (2) Serbia, the1exile
Serbia (2) Kalishnikov, Aimless
Aimless (1) ga7
ga7 (1) Pancakemix
Freezie (2) LSU Tiger Josh, Kwanton
PCM (1) Talapus
Kwanton (1) Freezie
Not Voting (2) Koesen, GimpytheWonder

with 16 alive it takes 9 to lynch!


36 hours have passed! Another 36 remain although I am considering the possibility of a 24 hour extension if no lynch has been reached by that point.

[Serbia]

So we're looking at night time sometime on Saturday? FTR, I won't be around from Friday night through late Saturday night.

[Anarkistsdream]

Unvote

Vote:Gimpy

He didn't post between my time limit...

[Koesen]

Gone today and tomorrow, back on Sunday.

Vote against extensions

If people can't get their act together, they should accept the consequences. I don't like games that drag on forever. A deadline is a deadline.

[Anarkistsdream]

Gone today and tomorrow, back on Sunday.

Vote against extensions

If people can't get their act together, they should accept the consequences. I don't like games that drag on forever. A deadline is a deadline.

QFT

[wicked]

I never liked hair extensions either.

[LSU Tiger Josh]

Unvote Vote Koeson while I don't like games to drag on forever, I would rather have an extension then to get a freaking no lynch.

[kwanton]

Vote: kwanton For saying early to vote for me because of my un-called inactiviness. Also used as a way to deflect attention from Serbia, if any of them are scum. I shall get that post soon.

I early voted for you because you were inactive yes. Better than a completely random vote with no basis whatsoever.

Deflect attention away from serbia? I voted for you before aimless's accusations.

But unvote since you are here.

[Fircoal]

Unvote Vote Koeson while I don't like games to drag on forever, I would rather have an extension then to get a freaking no lynch.

QFT, a lynch is better than a no lynch almost every time. DEadlines should come second to this. IN my opinion deadlines, shouldn't even exist. (Which is why mine are deadline-free. )