Conquer Club

New Jedi Order Mafia MOZ & VONG WIN

Housing completed games. Come take a walk through a history of suspicion!

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Postby Skittles! on Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:08 am

Oh please. Because I bought Exile's claim doesn't mean I'm scum.

So what? I said my suspicions are getting the same again. I've always had suspicions with Nag and ML. I've stated them before, then just before then.

Is it just me, or are the French always thinking I'm scum? :roll:
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
User avatar
Private Skittles!
 
Posts: 14575
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 2:18 am

Postby kalishnikov on Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:12 am

MountainLion wrote:I found some interesting posts by kalish right on the two pages just before Exile is lynched. Kalish suggests that Exile's claim as survivor could become a more useful role later on which is an agreement with what Exile said about his "roleclaim."

On page 78:

kalishnikov wrote:Well if Exile's claim is true, I don't see a need to lynch him quite yet. If we get no better leads he would make a decent fall-back to end Day 2. Another possibility, perhaps he's linked to a different character to gain his powers. I'm not sure how or why but he may yet be useful to us at some point.


Then just before the hammer is dropped on Exile, Kalish FOS'd Tonka for voting Exile and says "we've got all the time in the world" which sounds like a plea for everyone to stop voting Exile.

On page 79:

kalishnikov wrote:
got tonkaed wrote:vote exile

it seems like this will be the only real line that can be explored in the time left today.


Oh yea, FOS: gt.

What did you mean? We've got all the time in the world... Even when someone wins, the game isn't over :). Do you know something that we don't?


vote kalish


I only said we had all the time in the world in relation to gt's statement in the post before mine saying we didn't have much time left today, not meaning we shouldn't have lynched him. It was also half in jest because of the revealing of Moz's role and the game not ending, thus the next sentence of my post that you quoted.

I didn't FOS him for voting Exile, I FOS'ed him for his statement of limited time, as did a few others. Just thought it was an odd thing to say as there are no deadlines.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class kalishnikov
 
Posts: 2291
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 10:41 pm
Location: Domari Nolo

Postby ga7 on Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:20 am

Skittles! wrote:Oh please. Because I bought Exile's claim doesn't mean I'm scum.

So what? I said my suspicions are getting the same again. I've always had suspicions with Nag and ML. I've stated them before, then just before then.

Is it just me, or are the French always thinking I'm scum? :roll:

You didn't just buy his claim, you denied the whole charges against him all along the day.
Btw, I'm the only french mafia player here and I don't think we've played so often :roll:
User avatar
Lieutenant ga7
 
Posts: 5344
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 1:15 pm
Location: Pit

Postby Skittles! on Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:24 am

ga7 wrote:
Skittles! wrote:Oh please. Because I bought Exile's claim doesn't mean I'm scum.

So what? I said my suspicions are getting the same again. I've always had suspicions with Nag and ML. I've stated them before, then just before then.

Is it just me, or are the French always thinking I'm scum? :roll:

You didn't just buy his claim, you denied the whole charges against him all along the day.
Btw, I'm the only french mafia player here and I don't think we've played so often :roll:

I know you're the only French mafia player here. And we've played a few, and everytime you think your 'scumdar' tings off when i post.

I didn't deny changes, I just didn't agree with them, because he didn't act or seemingly go scummy the whole time. In the first day when AK was around, I was suspicious of Exile.
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
User avatar
Private Skittles!
 
Posts: 14575
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 2:18 am

Postby ga7 on Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:24 am

PS: Oh true, I accused you in Braveheart mafia before getting NKed. I do seem to recall your role there was Mafia Janitor :mrgreen:
User avatar
Lieutenant ga7
 
Posts: 5344
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 1:15 pm
Location: Pit

Postby Minister Masket on Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:06 am

Going nowhere this discussion is. Suggest prodding inactive players, I do.
Victrix Fortuna Sapientia

Image
User avatar
Private Minister Masket
 
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 2:24 pm
Location: On The Brink

Postby Anarkistsdream on Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:10 am

Minister Masket wrote:Going nowhere this discussion is. Suggest prodding inactive players, I do.


I concur...

There are a great many people that have not posted in two or three real life days.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
User avatar
Cook Anarkistsdream
 
Posts: 7567
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 11:57 am

Postby wicked on Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:12 am

MM do you have a post restriction, or are you just talking like that for shits and grins?
User avatar
Major wicked
 
Posts: 15787
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:23 pm

Postby Minister Masket on Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:13 am

Out of sheer curiosity and boredom, who do you lot think I am in the NJO Universe?
And no I'm not telling you if you're right or wrong. :wink:
Victrix Fortuna Sapientia

Image
User avatar
Private Minister Masket
 
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 2:24 pm
Location: On The Brink

Postby Anarkistsdream on Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:14 am

Minister Masket wrote:Out of sheer curiosity and boredom, who do you lot think I am in the NJO Universe?
And no I'm not telling you if you're right or wrong. :wink:


I guarantee you are not yoda...

And you just proved you don't have a post restriction...
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
User avatar
Cook Anarkistsdream
 
Posts: 7567
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 11:57 am

Postby Minister Masket on Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:23 am

wicked wrote:MM do you have a post restriction, or are you just talking like that for shits and grins?

T'is appropriate, is it not?
Victrix Fortuna Sapientia

Image
User avatar
Private Minister Masket
 
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 2:24 pm
Location: On The Brink

Postby wicked on Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:26 am

kalishnikov wrote:
wicked wrote:
kalishnikov wrote:No, I don't think it's coincidence. He's a smart player and if he's not scum the mafia always try to take him out or recruit him early, just like mandalorian and Fircoal. If any of them live past night 5 in a game they are probably scum...


ugh, having been on the receiving end of that "logic", I can tell you that's total BS. There are a number of high target players in this game. Scum don't have to have a reason to kill someone, they often look for whomever will draw the least suspicion to them. It's most likely not a "coincidence" or him being a "smart player" or anything other than he was off the radar.


I think that goes without saying. The first 'rule' of being scum is only make the kill that doesn't bring suspicion back on you, i.e. someone lying low and not posting much.


So I contradict you and you agree with me? :? I don't have time to really read through and research what's been posted recently, but I'll try to do that at lunch today and vote.
User avatar
Major wicked
 
Posts: 15787
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:23 pm

Postby wicked on Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:27 am

Minister Masket wrote:
wicked wrote:MM do you have a post restriction, or are you just talking like that for shits and grins?

T'is appropriate, is it not?


nah more annoying than anything else. so you don't have a post restriction then?
User avatar
Major wicked
 
Posts: 15787
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:23 pm

Postby Anarkistsdream on Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:29 am

wicked wrote:
Minister Masket wrote:
wicked wrote:MM do you have a post restriction, or are you just talking like that for shits and grins?

T'is appropriate, is it not?


nah more annoying than anything else. so you don't have a post restriction then?


:lol: :lol:
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
User avatar
Cook Anarkistsdream
 
Posts: 7567
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 11:57 am

Postby Minister Masket on Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:45 am

wicked wrote:
Minister Masket wrote:
wicked wrote:MM do you have a post restriction, or are you just talking like that for shits and grins?

T'is appropriate, is it not?


nah more annoying than anything else. so you don't have a post restriction then?

Restriction, I have not!
Victrix Fortuna Sapientia

Image
User avatar
Private Minister Masket
 
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 2:24 pm
Location: On The Brink

Postby MountainLion on Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:55 am

kalishnikov wrote:I only said we had all the time in the world in relation to gt's statement in the post before mine saying we didn't have much time left today, not meaning we shouldn't have lynched him. It was also half in jest because of the revealing of Moz's role and the game not ending, thus the next sentence of my post that you quoted.

I didn't FOS him for voting Exile, I FOS'ed him for his statement of limited time, as did a few others. Just thought it was an odd thing to say as there are no deadlines.


Okay I agree that him saying we had limited time warrants an FOS on Tonka. You still didn't vote him, however, and you were there at the end of his lynch.

So why didn't you vote him?
User avatar
Major MountainLion
 
Posts: 1282
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 4:33 pm
Location: Colorado

Postby nagerous on Tue Sep 18, 2007 11:05 am

Skittles! wrote:It also looks like Nagerous and ML are leading us here. I'm not too sure if I like that. Suspicious because that's what I do when I'm scum.

I'm back to my usual suspicion of Nag and ML. Actually..

vote Nag

FOS ML


See where this gets us.



Skittles! I'm not sure why you always think I'm scum but I've kinda gotten used to it, in fact I am most suspicious of you when you don't think I'm scum because its normally means you yourself are scum ;). Anyway, your accusation against me is laced with contradictions and especially considering you first accused me for pushing a lynch against exile and for pushing a lynch against Iceman: the latter being untrue because if you read the end of day one, I was trying to persuade people not to vote Iceman and got some FOSes for that too. Also, once you saw that me and Mountainlion were right in our accusations against exile, why come day three would you vote me again when I have just helped the town bring a result. I would be way more suspicious of you if I had not known from past games where I've been pro-town, you've been pro-town and you've accused me (WW2,Batman,Pokemon being first that come to mind).
Image
User avatar
Captain nagerous
 
Posts: 7513
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 7:39 am

Postby kalishnikov on Tue Sep 18, 2007 11:20 am

MountainLion wrote:
kalishnikov wrote:I only said we had all the time in the world in relation to gt's statement in the post before mine saying we didn't have much time left today, not meaning we shouldn't have lynched him. It was also half in jest because of the revealing of Moz's role and the game not ending, thus the next sentence of my post that you quoted.

I didn't FOS him for voting Exile, I FOS'ed him for his statement of limited time, as did a few others. Just thought it was an odd thing to say as there are no deadlines.


Okay I agree that him saying we had limited time warrants an FOS on Tonka. You still didn't vote him, however, and you were there at the end of his lynch.

So why didn't you vote him?


I made the post which you are referring to and left (Exile was at 12), then the following 2 posts by firth and wicked hammered him. If I would have checked back and there was still votes needed I'd have jumped on the wagon.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class kalishnikov
 
Posts: 2291
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 10:41 pm
Location: Domari Nolo

Postby kalishnikov on Tue Sep 18, 2007 11:26 am

wicked wrote:
kalishnikov wrote:
wicked wrote:
kalishnikov wrote:No, I don't think it's coincidence. He's a smart player and if he's not scum the mafia always try to take him out or recruit him early, just like mandalorian and Fircoal. If any of them live past night 5 in a game they are probably scum...


ugh, having been on the receiving end of that "logic", I can tell you that's total BS. There are a number of high target players in this game. Scum don't have to have a reason to kill someone, they often look for whomever will draw the least suspicion to them. It's most likely not a "coincidence" or him being a "smart player" or anything other than he was off the radar.


I think that goes without saying. The first 'rule' of being scum is only make the kill that doesn't bring suspicion back on you, i.e. someone lying low and not posting much.


So I contradict you and you agree with me? :? I don't have time to really read through and research what's been posted recently, but I'll try to do that at lunch today and vote.


Yea, I guess thats what happened. My original statement was made from observations over the course of many games though, not just this one. He seems to turn up dead early quite often.

All I was saying is that I agree with you in this case that he was probably killed due to his under-the-radar status in addition to what I thought.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class kalishnikov
 
Posts: 2291
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 10:41 pm
Location: Domari Nolo

Postby Syzygy on Tue Sep 18, 2007 11:41 am

kwanton wrote:
nagerous wrote: Kwanton was only there because of something he said to me


Care to elaborate?


Anyone else think Nag sounds quite peculiar here. It seems he avoided answering this.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Syzygy
 
Posts: 3382
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 1:07 pm
Location: My Acre of Africa

Postby Anarkistsdream on Tue Sep 18, 2007 11:42 am

He does seem to be avoiding most anything productive... :wink:

Unvote
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
User avatar
Cook Anarkistsdream
 
Posts: 7567
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 11:57 am

Postby mandalorian2298 on Tue Sep 18, 2007 12:15 pm

VOTE COUNT

Huckleberryhound (1) - Fircoal
Talapus (2) - Kalish, MM
Freezie (3) - Nagerus. Huck, Tonka
Kalishnikov (1) - M Lion,
Nagerus (1) - Skittles
Skittles (1) - Ga7

With 24 alive it takes 13 to lynch.
Mishuk gotal'u meshuroke, pako kyore.

Image

Talapus wrote:I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
User avatar
Lieutenant mandalorian2298
 
Posts: 4536
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 3:57 pm
Location: www.chess.com

Postby Syzygy on Tue Sep 18, 2007 12:18 pm

Vote: Nagerous. You look fairly scummy to me.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Syzygy
 
Posts: 3382
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 1:07 pm
Location: My Acre of Africa

Postby mandalorian2298 on Tue Sep 18, 2007 12:21 pm

ANOUNCEMENT

Firth 2.0 is replacing Aegnor.

You may ask Firth NOTHING about his previous role. He in turn may not respond to any of your questions (it doesnt matter if the answer is true or false). Violation of these rules that results in Firth giving ANY info (real or made up) about his previous life as Luke Skywalker will result in Modkill of both Firth and the person who asked (in jest or otherwise.)

YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED! :twisted:
Mishuk gotal'u meshuroke, pako kyore.

Image

Talapus wrote:I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
User avatar
Lieutenant mandalorian2298
 
Posts: 4536
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 3:57 pm
Location: www.chess.com

Postby Anarkistsdream on Tue Sep 18, 2007 12:22 pm

SIR, YES, SIR!
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
User avatar
Cook Anarkistsdream
 
Posts: 7567
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 11:57 am

PreviousNext

Return to Mafia Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users