Moderator: Community Team
Skittles! wrote:Possibly the most active people are scum. From previous games, I've learnt that scum are normally either active or very active, and hardly ever submarine. If they submarine, who will they know whom to kill that night? If they have a role-blocker, whom will they know to role-block if they don't watch every little detail of everyone's post to guess who might have a night action.
wicked wrote:freezie wrote:Wicked, I was basicly asking a question. I am confused about that mason jedis thingy.
Although it seems they don't know each others, that is, from what the jedis have said. That is what Neutrino said, am I right?
But my vote was from tres analysis, not from the fact I don't know what everyone is claiming about.
exactly my point. you don't know how jedis are operating, which is the same reason you stated for voting Neutrino!
But my vote was from tres analysis, not from the fact I don't know what everyone is claiming about.
kwanton wrote:Skittles! wrote:Possibly the most active people are scum. From previous games, I've learnt that scum are normally either active or very active, and hardly ever submarine. If they submarine, who will they know whom to kill that night? If they have a role-blocker, whom will they know to role-block if they don't watch every little detail of everyone's post to guess who might have a night action.
Meh. Somewhat true. I would think that third-party members would submarine. It doesn't signify scumminess, since not all third parties are anti-town per se, but usually when someone is submarining with no real reason I think they aren't town.
Neutrino wrote:Frankly, I'm supprised at the amount of momentum that can be built up from a relititively innocent statement, like "Jedi function like masons". How can this possibly be construed as a scumtell?
I admit, though, that I didn't do as much re-reading as I should have to check the accuracy of my statement (ie. any); at the time it didn't feel like I had too. I recalled one of the self confessed Jedi's saying something about mason communication and the idea itself made sence (the Jedi can sence eachother through the Force). Unfortunatly, my recollection and logic were faulty.
Still, why the bandwagon? How can some light skimming in a 100 pg thread and shoddy logic ever be considered scummy?
Syzygy wrote:Just pointing out that voting for two different people for the exact same reason, and splitting the votes, ain't going to help.
Skittles! wrote:Possibly the most active people are scum. From previous games, I've learnt that scum are normally either active or very active, and hardly ever submarine. If they submarine, who will they know whom to kill that night? If they have a role-blocker, whom will they know to role-block if they don't watch every little detail of everyone's post to guess who might have a night action.
wicked wrote:Freezie, what is your role? You've said you're not a Jedi. I think the non-jedi's probably aren't power roles, so what's the harm in your claiming? You pushed me to claim, so now I'm turning the tables on you and asking you the exact same thing - quote your role.
wicked wrote:Freezie, what is your role? You've said you're not a Jedi. I think the non-jedi's probably aren't power roles, so what's the harm in your claiming? You pushed me to claim, so now I'm turning the tables on you and asking you the exact same thing - quote your role.
mandy wrote:Fine, Can I at least Role-Claim? Rolling Eyes
Of course you can. However, many roles will face quick and ignoble death (not Mod-Kill, but “natural” causes Twisted Evil ) if they claim. So, Mass role-claim = Mafia wins.
Our Clumsy Mod wrote:Fine, Can I at least Role-Claim?
Of course you can. However, many roles will face quick and ignoble death (not Mod-Kill, but “natural” causes) if they claim. So, Mass role-claim = Mafia wins.
wicked wrote: Fine, everyone vote.
kalishnikov wrote:Speaking of submarining... Hi kwanton
freezie wrote:wicked wrote:Freezie, what is your role? You've said you're not a Jedi. I think the non-jedi's probably aren't power roles, so what's the harm in your claiming? You pushed me to claim, so now I'm turning the tables on you and asking you the exact same thing - quote your role.
If you hadn't claim, which you did with many more votes than I have right now, we probably would have a power-role dead ( YOU ).
I won't claim for the sake of claiming, when I am not even in danger.
I see claiming as a way to prevent a power-role lynched, but claiming without reason is just plain dumb.
Minister Masket wrote:Our Clumsy Mod wrote:Fine, Can I at least Role-Claim?
Of course you can. However, many roles will face quick and ignoble death (not Mod-Kill, but “natural” causes) if they claim. So, Mass role-claim = Mafia wins.
Maybe THIS is the reason why freezie doesn't want to claim?wicked wrote: Fine, everyone vote.
Ok, everyone vote wicked!
MountainLion wrote:freezie wrote:wicked wrote:Freezie, what is your role? You've said you're not a Jedi. I think the non-jedi's probably aren't power roles, so what's the harm in your claiming? You pushed me to claim, so now I'm turning the tables on you and asking you the exact same thing - quote your role.
If you hadn't claim, which you did with many more votes than I have right now, we probably would have a power-role dead ( YOU ).
I won't claim for the sake of claiming, when I am not even in danger.
I see claiming as a way to prevent a power-role lynched, but claiming without reason is just plain dumb.
Freezie, wicked roleclaimed her character's name, you then unvoted her, then voted her again and asked for a quote. I really don't think wicked's roleclaim quote was necessary at the time. Her name claim slowed things down, but then YOU pushed back on her to quote.
I've already voted you for this...I'm tempted to vote again. Does anyone else have a problem with freezie pushing wicked to quote her role?
freezie wrote:Vote: Wicked
Back to my vote on you.
You already revealed a lot to the scum. At worst, AK will go down.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users