Moderator: Community Team
pancakemix wrote:...da fuq?
Vote Cykrias
Methinks some are taking this too far.
pancakemix wrote:Some7hingCLEVER wrote:ckyrias wrote:unvote
i will be off the next 36 hours approximately. mod is notified.
leaving as the pressure grows.
scumtell
Maybe, but 36 hours is a specific amount of time. I'm not one to lynch someone in absentia either.
Ragian wrote:Well ... it's (almost) random pressure day. I usually go with one of the quiet ones to be honest. Neither CLEVER nor Shaggy has posted since Wednesday.
*tosses coin*
unvote vote shaggy
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
safariguy5 wrote:Well, are we going to pick BK as the person to claim? I'm willing to apply pressure if he is.
unvote
pmchugh wrote:safariguy5 wrote:Well, are we going to pick BK as the person to claim? I'm willing to apply pressure if he is.
unvote
Whatttt? I understand the rest of these guys wanting a claim for no reason (cause they are noobs) but why do you? Unless this is a reactions ploy then I don't see how we benefit from just getting a player to claim. There are going to be a lot of easy fake claims out there and after we get someone to claim what then?
safariguy5 wrote:pmchugh wrote:safariguy5 wrote:Well, are we going to pick BK as the person to claim? I'm willing to apply pressure if he is.
unvote
Whatttt? I understand the rest of these guys wanting a claim for no reason (cause they are noobs) but why do you? Unless this is a reactions ploy then I don't see how we benefit from just getting a player to claim. There are going to be a lot of easy fake claims out there and after we get someone to claim what then?
Day 1 usually ends up with some pretty weak case leading to a claim, I figure one is just as good as another. Moot point now that someone else has put him at L-2 I think.
pretender77 wrote:i feel that although pancake has given us nothing to work with. hes gonnaa be their later in the game if an easy lynch is needed. unvote vote bk
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
pmchugh wrote:safariguy5 wrote:pmchugh wrote:safariguy5 wrote:Well, are we going to pick BK as the person to claim? I'm willing to apply pressure if he is.
unvote
Whatttt? I understand the rest of these guys wanting a claim for no reason (cause they are noobs) but why do you? Unless this is a reactions ploy then I don't see how we benefit from just getting a player to claim. There are going to be a lot of easy fake claims out there and after we get someone to claim what then?
Day 1 usually ends up with some pretty weak case leading to a claim, I figure one is just as good as another. Moot point now that someone else has put him at L-2 I think.
Pretty weak? There is no real reason for it, at least when people give reasons and arguments (albeit weak ones) you can separate those hopping on the BW from those genuinely trying to do something. You know as well as anyone that if you get someone to claim for virtually no reason then you are back at square one, or else you pick someone on the BW to vote next. Right now I do not have enough to want BK to claim, and I am v surprised you are going along with this.
unvote vote saf
Ragian wrote:I could just as well turn it around, saying that you're protecting your pancake scumbuddy by forcing BK to claim since scum know whose not scum (i.e. town/3rd party). It's doesn't really make sense at this point though. Is that what's called WIFOM?
pershy wrote:I agree with what Safari guy just said. Ck could actually be a good person to pressure - but seems that BK is the one who is L-3. So what have you got to say for yourself BK?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users