Moderator: Community Team
Hensow wrote:safariguy5 wrote:Hensow wrote:Did I really need to confurm it was an OMGUS vote
OMGUS vote for a valid point somehow is not scummy? And you admitting it was an OMGUS vote gives you no leeway to argue otherwise.
unvote vote hensow
I did not take VioIet's vote as a serious vote that is to say I did not (and do not) believe that at the time of casting her vote for me she had any intention of me being the day one lynch just as my OMGUS vote for her was made with out intent of lynching her.
that was the extent of my reasoning to provide a longer defense I would have to lie or discredit the scum tell.
saying this I suppose I should unvote which I suppose in it self is going to be called a scum tail but I ask would I be asked why I did not unvote.
safariguy5 wrote:jonty125 wrote:Well if this game is geting serious then, unvote, vote jak for doing a Yomiel and constructing a very weak case made of WIFOM about an imaginary link between three posts.
At least I give jak some credit for trying to get a case, it being Day 1 and whatnot. Someone has to start it, even if it's not the best.
unvote for now.
jonty125 wrote:safariguy5 wrote:jonty125 wrote:Well if this game is geting serious then, unvote, vote jak for doing a Yomiel and constructing a very weak case made of WIFOM about an imaginary link between three posts.
At least I give jak some credit for trying to get a case, it being Day 1 and whatnot. Someone has to start it, even if it's not the best.
unvote for now.
Yes, but is it good to make a weak case based on two posts (except for inactivity)??
vodean wrote:jonty125 wrote:safariguy5 wrote:jonty125 wrote:Well if this game is geting serious then, unvote, vote jak for doing a Yomiel and constructing a very weak case made of WIFOM about an imaginary link between three posts.
At least I give jak some credit for trying to get a case, it being Day 1 and whatnot. Someone has to start it, even if it's not the best.
unvote for now.
Yes, but is it good to make a weak case based on two posts (except for inactivity)??
at this stage its hard to find more than two posts
DRoZ wrote:About when or how to make a case... that is the point of this game. Of course early days cases will be predominately weak, but that shouldn't discourage someone from detailing their thought process. You develop a theory, see if all the evidence corroborates, and then offer it up for debate amongst your peers. If it has no merit, then those opposed will defend their position, debate occurs and the majority decide which side (if either) held water. Telling people that they shouldn't formulate ideas and discuss them seems extremely counterproductive.
pmchugh wrote:If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
Mr. Squirrel wrote:DRoZ wrote:About when or how to make a case... that is the point of this game. Of course early days cases will be predominately weak, but that shouldn't discourage someone from detailing their thought process. You develop a theory, see if all the evidence corroborates, and then offer it up for debate amongst your peers. If it has no merit, then those opposed will defend their position, debate occurs and the majority decide which side (if either) held water. Telling people that they shouldn't formulate ideas and discuss them seems extremely counterproductive.
Who was this directed towards? Pardon my asking.
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
aage wrote:I simply don't see the value of building a case against someone on the third page of the thread.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
Hensow wrote:It was a throw away comment I meant there is no long defence it was a stupid vote.
this is about my 4th game of mafia
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users