[THE DEPARTED MAFIA] -MAFIA WIN!- (dom and freezie)

[sheepofdumb]

Wait, what? So you think I'm mafia because I would be likely to take narc out because he's a good player. I just want to make sure why you are FOSing me.

No. The FOS was in response to Narc's well known desire not to play in a game with you. Like I said, were the situation reversed, I would suspect Narc immediately; this way around, I'm not sure. It's possible that you would kill him out of revenge, but... I think that, all things considered, it's probably unlikely.

I don't want to rule it out, though, hence my "very small FOS."

I don't mind narc not wanting to play with me. It makes no difference to me. If he wants to not enjoy his game because I'm there then that's his fault. I do understand where your coming from though.

[lord twiggy1]

Vote: Guilty_Biscuit

why?

EDIT:sorry i edited this post. the following is what i edited out:

1.
Security level

2.
Bright Red:High
Maroon:Medium
Pale Red:Low
White:None

[pancakemix]

That explains everything.

[XenHu]

Last edited by lord twiggy1 on 04 May 2007 22:40; edited 2 times in total

Don't edit posts!



-X

[lord twiggy1]

just a post count, i was bored so i did it and posted it

[lord twiggy1]

Last edited by lord twiggy1 on 04 May 2007 22:40; edited 2 times in total

Don't edit posts!



-X

oh ya, duh sorry, ill put it back to how it was.

[sheepofdumb]

Last edited by lord twiggy1 on 04 May 2007 22:40; edited 2 times in total

Don't edit posts!



-X

oh ya, duh sorry, ill put it back to how it was.

What the heck? What is that chart supposed to mean? Don't edit posts ever. We lynched what's-his-face because he edited out the word 'bandwagon'.

[lord twiggy1]

just look at it and youll know, and i fixed the edit to how it was.

[pancakemix]

That... really didn't help at all...

[sheepofdumb]

just look at it and youll know, and i fixed the edit to how it was.

Stop editing it. It still doesn't make any sense.

[lord twiggy1]

allright allright sory

[MountainLion]

If we have an SK, we also have a good Doc. I'm kind of against the SK theory at the moment, I think we're dealing with just one scum group, of probably 5-6 players.

Final Note: There will be no Jester, Cult or Serial Killer in this game.

[Colaalone]

vote Colaalone

You thought that I would forget, didn't you

What the hell, lol?

[Fircoal]

vote Colaalone

You thought that I would forget, didn't you

What the hell, lol?

he said what he said above, he is scum.

[LSU Tiger Josh]

Twig why are the ones with 0 posts in white as that would make them extra suspicious to me to being scum for not posting.

[lord twiggy1]

thats a good point. ill update it and give you a new one

[lord twiggy1]

Security level

Gold:Extremely Suspisious
Bright Red:High
Maroon:Medium
Pale Red:Low
White:None

[LSU Tiger Josh]

Unvote

VOTE XENHU as he didn't just join the game in a takeover fashion and hasn't posted.

[Aimless]

If we have an SK, we also have a good Doc. I'm kind of against the SK theory at the moment, I think we're dealing with just one scum group, of probably 5-6 players.

Final Note: There will be no Jester, Cult or Serial Killer in this game.

Well, I guess it's a good thing that we don't have a SK. On the other hand, that means we also don't have a good doc.

And I should really learn to read the rules, rather than skimming them.

[Aimless]

As for twiggy - I get what he's trying to do, and I appreciate it, but two things would be nice. One, smaller image for your next one; some of us don't view the world in 80000 by 60000 resolution. And two, and explanation of the metric you used for to determine overall scumminess would be nice.

As for the post count thing; day one was too short to accuse people of submarining.

[lord twiggy1]

i kind of just decided who was more of a security threat by my own judgement, i thought that if they had like only 1 or none, or a ton they were high, if they had a bunchbut not a ton they were medium, if they had a few they were either low or none.

[diddle]

vote mandalorian

[Guilty_Biscuit]

i kind of just decided who was more of a security threat by my own judgement, i thought that if they had like only 1 or none, or a ton they were high, if they had a bunchbut not a ton they were medium, if they had a few they were either low or none.

I think what you are doing is a good idea twiggy

HUGE BUT

It only took the lynchers 2 HOURS from the game starting to lynch duday - most people will not have had a chance to post much during that period. So your list will be more interesting after another couple of days.

[unriggable]

i kind of just decided who was more of a security threat by my own judgement, i thought that if they had like only 1 or none, or a ton they were high, if they had a bunchbut not a ton they were medium, if they had a few they were either low or none.

I think what you are doing is a good idea twiggy

HUGE BUT

It only took the lynchers 2 HOURS from the game starting to lynch duday - most people will not have had a chance to post much during that period. So your list will be more interesting after another couple of days.

Which is why I only have 3 posts! Notice how I didn't vote for him. You guys take your time now...

[Talapus]

It's still kinda early to point any fingers and know who the guilty party is....unless of course someone wants to volunteer. Any takers... ?