karelpietertje wrote:Scum won't lose much by not giving away info, but we have a long way (at least 2 or 3 game-days) ahead of us figuring out our own and others' presents, and scum will definitely try to spread a lot of confusion in this.
First off, I don't see why we even need to figure out what our gifts our. As long as there aren't any overtly negative gifts out there then you will pretty much make the same decision regardless of what the exact power it is. Meaning, that you will basically want to send whatever power you have to whomever you think is among the best town aligned player. Secondly, why would the scum try to spread confusion in regards to this? If they lie about anything regarding gifts there is a chance that someone could catch that they lied. So while they could try to gain some sort of advantage by making the town a little more confused, the risk of them being caught doing so seem to greatly outweigh any potential benefits.
aage wrote:I've been thinking and I don't think this is going to happen. If I were scum and I'd get a cop gift from the person below me every night, I wouldn't really kill that person. That'd just be stupid. Scum gains an investigation every night and don't have to tell town about it.
Um, if the plan you are referring to here is the one that's purpose would be to unmask everyone's gifts by having them send their gift to a specific person, then this scenario would not actually occur. That plan, as I understand it, would ideally have everyone's gift figured out by day 2. After that people would presumably be able to send gifts to whomever they thought would be the best person the have their gift. They would definitely not be forced to gift to the same person every night, that would be even more stupid than the plan itself.
karelpietertje wrote:You must realize that when deadline was announced I had no need to put my head on the line. If I were mafia, I would not have tried to make a case at all.
Unless, of course that your scumbuddy was the person with the most votes when the deadline was announced. At that point you may have decided to try to help them out by trying to build a case against someone else, knowing that the case didn't have to be exceptionally strong, that once you got that new bandwagon to have more votes than the previous one inertia would carry it to the deadline.
At this point, that actually seems like it might be the best case we have at the moment, so I will
unvote Vote karelpietertje.