Moderator: Community Team
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Anarkistsdream wrote:TEEEHEEHEEHEE!!!
I was evil and AAGE helped me!!!
safariguy5 wrote:Yeah, I'd say kernov might be a bit responsible.Still, it's a good learning experience and we all were in his shoes once.
Hank44Soccer wrote:Subject: Back to the Future Mafia Day 1diddle wrote:But I'm not scum? Plus, I currently have two people voting for me, so it would be impossible to choose one to vote for in return (since at this point in the game votes can never be backed up with any real substance, bar the knowledge of a day cop, which is unlikely) as well as being incredibly stupid. Clutching at straws a bit are we VioIet? Desperate for a lynch hmmmmm?
watch your mouth scum
diddle wrote:Just realised I can say this now, my initial 'hard on' for hank was spurned on by the private message he sent me:Hank44Soccer wrote:Subject: Back to the Future Mafia Day 1diddle wrote:But I'm not scum? Plus, I currently have two people voting for me, so it would be impossible to choose one to vote for in return (since at this point in the game votes can never be backed up with any real substance, bar the knowledge of a day cop, which is unlikely) as well as being incredibly stupid. Clutching at straws a bit are we VioIet? Desperate for a lynch hmmmmm?
watch your mouth scum
It certainly aroused my suspicion, then after hank was killed it was a battle for me to stay alive! I didn't wanna quote his pm in game because that would undermine it all.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
kernov wrote:I thought a pm in anyway to do with the game isnt allowed?
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
DoomYoshi wrote:whoa... as if the mafia didn't win enough already, the townies were cheating![]()
safariguy5 wrote:diddle pm'ed me about it and I sent hank a warning. Cut him some slack because it was his first game, and modkilling him would have been really bad.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users