Conquer Club

Two Sides Mafia: Side A, Endgame, The Old Ways

Housing completed games. Come take a walk through a history of suspicion!

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Re: Two Sides Mafia: Side A, Day One!

Postby pancakemix on Tue Mar 20, 2012 9:55 am

edocsil wrote:Was this so hard?


International Maritime Organization is the first result.
Epic Win

"Always tell the truth. It's the easiest thing to remember." - Richard Roma, Glengarry Glen Ross

aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class pancakemix
 
Posts: 7973
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 3:39 pm
Location: The Grim Guzzler

Re: Two Sides Mafia: Side A, Day One!

Postby edocsil on Tue Mar 20, 2012 10:00 am

pancakemix wrote:
edocsil wrote:Was this so hard?


International Maritime Organization is the first result.


I know, I clicked it. First non-sponsor result is accurate.
Edoc'sil

Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.

zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class edocsil
 
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 8:09 am
Location: The Great State Of Minnesota

Re: Two Sides Mafia: Side A, Day One!

Postby shieldgenerator7 on Tue Mar 20, 2012 10:19 am

I clicked the link and clicked one of the entries (it was the pokelogy or something one) and got taken to a site with malicious content. JUst as a warning
Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to defeat all evil. -Ephesians 6 KJV

My Smiley: ( :) ) --- it's got SHIELDS!

everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
User avatar
Sergeant shieldgenerator7
 
Posts: 619
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2010 10:59 am
Location: somewhere along my spiritual journey

Re: Two Sides Mafia: Side A, Day One!

Postby jonty125 on Tue Mar 20, 2012 10:36 am

drunkmonkey wrote:
jonty125 wrote:My position on Rodion hasn't changed. FOS shield for his post on the top of Page 8 I think.


Here are your first two posts supporting your vote:
jonty125 wrote:vote Rodion. For instantly assuming there are no 3rd party players and asking some people effectively to give up one of the 2 games.

jonty125 wrote:Take this scenario: I am town/mafia. I could say town/town and then suicide as town where I was town and if I came under pressure as mafia I could say, look I'm a truthful guy - I must be town.


So, your position seems to be that Rodion is scummy because:
1) His plan didn't allow for 3rd party players
2) He's asking some people (mafia) to give up one of the two games
3) You think somehow claiming T/T means you'll be cleared if you flip town in one game, which Rodion never said.

This is a very weak case, IMO. Did I miss anything?


Other than I can't see the gain of the plan, you got it all.
War doesn't determine who's right; it determines who's left.
User avatar
Cook jonty125
 
Posts: 279
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 12:48 pm

Re: Two Sides Mafia: Side A, Day One!

Postby Rodion on Tue Mar 20, 2012 12:39 pm

drunkmonkey wrote:So, your position seems to be that Rodion is scummy because:
1) His plan didn't allow for 3rd party players
2) He's asking some people (mafia) to give up one of the two games
3) You think somehow claiming T/T means you'll be cleared if you flip town in one game, which Rodion never said.

This is a very weak case, IMO. Did I miss anything?


jonty125 wrote:4) Other than I can't see the gain of the plan, you got it all.



3 shouldn't even be considered as I never said that.
2 is only a point if you feel sorry for mafia players, which would make you highly scummy.
1 is what I tried to make Jonty understand about 6 pages ago that "devising a plan to find mafia is good regardless of whether the game has or does not have 3rd-parties", but I gave up in the middle of the argument because I lost faith in his intelligence.
4 only reassures myself that I made a good decision giving up in 1.

Like Safari said, I'm currently getting lynched because kids (VS and Jonty, perhaps you can add CMS5 here) at the family gathering picked a side and stuck with it.
User avatar
General Rodion
 
Posts: 1380
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 5:33 pm
Location: São Paulo, Brazil

Re: Two Sides Mafia: Side A, Day One!

Postby jonty125 on Tue Mar 20, 2012 12:56 pm

Yes I agree finding mafia is good but we should also be looking for 3rd party such as SK.
War doesn't determine who's right; it determines who's left.
User avatar
Cook jonty125
 
Posts: 279
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 12:48 pm

Misses the Point and Keeps Vote on Rodion Mafia

Postby Rodion on Tue Mar 20, 2012 1:00 pm

jonty125 wrote:Yes I agree finding mafia is good but we should also be looking for 3rd party such as SK.


Image
User avatar
General Rodion
 
Posts: 1380
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 5:33 pm
Location: São Paulo, Brazil

Re: Two Sides Mafia: Side A, Day One!

Postby drunkmonkey on Tue Mar 20, 2012 1:01 pm

jonty125 wrote:
drunkmonkey wrote:
jonty125 wrote:My position on Rodion hasn't changed. FOS shield for his post on the top of Page 8 I think.


Here are your first two posts supporting your vote:
jonty125 wrote:vote Rodion. For instantly assuming there are no 3rd party players and asking some people effectively to give up one of the 2 games.

jonty125 wrote:Take this scenario: I am town/mafia. I could say town/town and then suicide as town where I was town and if I came under pressure as mafia I could say, look I'm a truthful guy - I must be town.


So, your position seems to be that Rodion is scummy because:
1) His plan didn't allow for 3rd party players
2) He's asking some people (mafia) to give up one of the two games
3) You think somehow claiming T/T means you'll be cleared if you flip town in one game, which Rodion never said.

This is a very weak case, IMO. Did I miss anything?


Other than I can't see the gain of the plan, you got it all.


I thought I made it quite obvious that parts 2 and 3 were awful reasons to cast a vote. 1 is shaky. I was expecting you to respond by clarifying the real reasons you voted. The last thing I expected was "yep, you got it - I think he's scummy because he wants mafia to concede and for something I'm pretending he said". I think I found the bandwagon case I'm ready to settle on.

vote jonty125

fastposted:
jonty125 wrote:Yes I agree finding mafia is good but we should also be looking for 3rd party such as SK.

Are you kidding me? You agree finding mafia is good, but...? BUT??? I'm not the least bit concerned about SK until the night flavor suggests one. Mafia is priority #1 right now. If I could make the above vote bolder, I would.
Image
User avatar
Major drunkmonkey
 
Posts: 1704
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 4:00 pm

Re: Two Sides Mafia: Side A, Day One!

Postby edocsil on Tue Mar 20, 2012 1:08 pm

drunkmonkey wrote:Are you kidding me? You agree finding mafia is good, but...? BUT??? I'm not the least bit concerned about SK until the night flavor suggests one. Mafia is priority #1 right now. If I could make the above vote bolder, I would.


I see nothing to indicate anything besides straight m vs t at this point. (D1 for gods sake) I agree, jonty is attempting to misdirect with his posts.
Edoc'sil

Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.

zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class edocsil
 
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 8:09 am
Location: The Great State Of Minnesota

Re: Two Sides Mafia: Side A, Day One!

Postby pancakemix on Tue Mar 20, 2012 4:36 pm

Rodion wrote:
drunkmonkey wrote:So, your position seems to be that Rodion is scummy because:
1) His plan didn't allow for 3rd party players
2) He's asking some people (mafia) to give up one of the two games
3) You think somehow claiming T/T means you'll be cleared if you flip town in one game, which Rodion never said.

This is a very weak case, IMO. Did I miss anything?


jonty125 wrote:4) Other than I can't see the gain of the plan, you got it all.



3 shouldn't even be considered as I never said that.
2 is only a point if you feel sorry for mafia players, which would make you highly scummy.
1 is what I tried to make Jonty understand about 6 pages ago that "devising a plan to find mafia is good regardless of whether the game has or does not have 3rd-parties", but I gave up in the middle of the argument because I lost faith in his intelligence.
4 only reassures myself that I made a good decision giving up in 1.

Like Safari said, I'm currently getting lynched because kids (VS and Jonty, perhaps you can add CMS5 here) at the family gathering picked a side and stuck with it.


One COULD almost argue point 2, but there's no reason to feel sorry for someone who would take an offer so statistically bad for them it hurts.

jonty125 wrote:Yes I agree finding mafia is good but we should also be looking for 3rd party such as SK.


Why should we be looking for them? Do you know something we don't?

unvote
Epic Win

"Always tell the truth. It's the easiest thing to remember." - Richard Roma, Glengarry Glen Ross

aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class pancakemix
 
Posts: 7973
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 3:39 pm
Location: The Grim Guzzler

Re: Two Sides Mafia: Side A, Day One!

Postby / on Tue Mar 20, 2012 8:50 pm

The Official Vote Count

Rodion
; 3 votes: Victor, jonty, CMS

Crazymilkshake
; 2 votes: Rodion, soundman

jonty
; 1 vote: drunkmonkey

Shieldgenerator; 1 vote: Safariguy

Two Days Left! remember lynches are forced unless you prevent them.
Sergeant 1st Class /
 
Posts: 484
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 2:41 am

Re: Two Sides Mafia: Side A, Day One!

Postby jonty125 on Wed Mar 21, 2012 10:45 am

pancakemix wrote:
Why should we be looking for them? Do you know something we don't?


No, but with no information from scenes yet we can't estimate how many killers we have so I'm trying to make sure we keep all paths open.
War doesn't determine who's right; it determines who's left.
User avatar
Cook jonty125
 
Posts: 279
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 12:48 pm

Re: Two Sides Mafia: Side A, Day One!

Postby Rodion on Wed Mar 21, 2012 2:32 pm

edocsil wrote:I see nothing to indicate anything besides straight m vs t at this point. (D1 for gods sake) I agree, jonty is attempting to misdirect with his posts.


If you think he's attempting to misdirect, what does that tell you about Jonty's alignment?

@Jonty - drunkmonkey and Edocsil don't seem willing to plan for 3rd-parties until evidence suggests there is one. Are they suspicious in your eyes? Why (not)?

Soundman, Shield, New Guy, Milkshake, Clever, VS - anything you'd like to say?
User avatar
General Rodion
 
Posts: 1380
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 5:33 pm
Location: São Paulo, Brazil

Re: Two Sides Mafia: Side A, Day One!

Postby crazymilkshake5 on Wed Mar 21, 2012 4:08 pm

Well, if he is trying to misdirect, i would say that he is most likely mafia trying to draw attention away from the mafia,

About DM and Edocsil not willing to plan for third parties, I believe that in every mafia game you enter you should go in thinking that there are third parties and town and mafia.

That is what i have to say.
highscore
Image
User avatar
Major crazymilkshake5
 
Posts: 745
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2011 3:30 pm
Location: Georgia.

Re: Two Sides Mafia: Side A, Day One!

Postby Rodion on Wed Mar 21, 2012 4:16 pm

crazymilkshake5 wrote:Well, if he is trying to misdirect, i would say that he is most likely mafia trying to draw attention away from the mafia,


The question was not really adressed to you, but thanks for the input. You did use "if", though. Can you tell us whether you think he is trying to misdirect or not?
User avatar
General Rodion
 
Posts: 1380
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 5:33 pm
Location: São Paulo, Brazil

Re: Two Sides Mafia: Side A, Day One!

Postby crazymilkshake5 on Wed Mar 21, 2012 4:37 pm

I think that he was just making a statement, so no, i do not believe that he was trying to.
highscore
Image
User avatar
Major crazymilkshake5
 
Posts: 745
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2011 3:30 pm
Location: Georgia.

Re: Two Sides Mafia: Side A, Day One!

Postby Rodion on Wed Mar 21, 2012 4:56 pm

crazymilkshake5 wrote:I think that he was just making a statement, so no, i do not believe that he was trying to.


So after spending 3+ days without a single post, someone asks you if you have anything to say and you just:

a) answer an obvious question (obviously, trying to misdirect makes you more likely to be anti-town) that wasn't even adressed at you

b) "answer" a question (again not adressed at you) with a totally safe and unnecessary response ("we should always be prepared for everything"), not to mention the "answer" failed to adress the actual question, the question being "Jonty, are Monkey and Edocsil suspicious for not being willing to consider the existence of a 3rd-party before evidence is presented"?

So, summary:
1 - 3+ days without posting
2 - posts right after his name is mentioned
3 - decides to comment solely on obvious/unnecessary things

Way to prove you're not lurking, pal.

My vote is currently in CMS5, but it can just as easily go to Jonty (or, really, anyone else that I can vote to avoid my own lynch).

Lurkers, start posting (and, unlike CMS5, please try to make it relevant)!
User avatar
General Rodion
 
Posts: 1380
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 5:33 pm
Location: São Paulo, Brazil

Re: Two Sides Mafia: Side A, Day One!

Postby shieldgenerator7 on Wed Mar 21, 2012 5:04 pm

About this misdirection and jonty: I really don't see any evidence so far that there would be third-party players, but I wouldn't doubt / to include some. My first suspicions that stemmed from jonty's continually insisting there's third-party is that he is in one side, specifically SK. I have no other evidence of this so this is just a hunch I have. But then again I hunched that Ragian was DV in Power Role and got myself lynched, so I don't have much faith in my hunch right now.

I do feel that the majority of the people who opposed Rodion's gameplan are more than likely T/M. It is probable (assuming straigt up T vs. M) that half of us are T/M players, which would explain why the plan was so openly rejected. In fact, I'm wondering right now whether Rodion proposed the plan because it's a good plan or whether because suggesting such plan would expose the T/M players.
FOS at all players who opposed this plan.

That's all I got for now.

FASTPOSTED

-SG7 ( :) )
Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to defeat all evil. -Ephesians 6 KJV

My Smiley: ( :) ) --- it's got SHIELDS!

everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
User avatar
Sergeant shieldgenerator7
 
Posts: 619
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2010 10:59 am
Location: somewhere along my spiritual journey

Re: Two Sides Mafia: Side A, Day One!

Postby crazymilkshake5 on Wed Mar 21, 2012 8:38 pm

Rodion wrote:Soundman, Shield, New Guy, Milkshake, Clever, VS - anything you'd like to say?


You Asked if i had anything id like to say, and just before you had said the quoted phrase, you had questions, so I felt like they were directed at me.
highscore
Image
User avatar
Major crazymilkshake5
 
Posts: 745
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2011 3:30 pm
Location: Georgia.

Re: Two Sides Mafia: Side A, Day One!

Postby new guy1 on Wed Mar 21, 2012 8:44 pm

I just got back home from working on a project with some friends, so far I am just confused. I lost many-a-brain cell trying to figure out how the Worlds connect, and I believe some roles can cross over to the opposite world. Im not sure, its just a hunch. As far as guilt goes, I am confused on it and currently dont think that Rodion has presented himself as scummier then I previously thought. I do not have anywhere to put my vote currently, as I dont see scummy behavior right now (just my opinion). I will reread and post if this changes, but if it does not change then I wont post about it again.

fastposted- That is a good point, Im sure it was just a misunderstanding.
User avatar
Sergeant new guy1
 
Posts: 51
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 7:20 pm

Re: Two Sides Mafia: Side A, Day One!

Postby safariguy5 on Wed Mar 21, 2012 9:03 pm

crazymilkshake5 wrote:Well, if he is trying to misdirect, i would say that he is most likely mafia trying to draw attention away from the mafia,

About DM and Edocsil not willing to plan for third parties, I believe that in every mafia game you enter you should go in thinking that there are third parties and town and mafia.

That is what i have to say.

Wow really? Every single game has third parties? I've modded games where there were no third party players and I've played in plenty where there weren't either. That seems to be an incredibly large leap considering its Day 1, which leads me to believe you know something the rest of us don't.

unvote vote crazymilkshake
Image
User avatar
Captain safariguy5
 
Posts: 1449
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 9:42 pm
Location: California

Re: Two Sides Mafia: Side A, Day One!

Postby crazymilkshake5 on Wed Mar 21, 2012 9:54 pm

Wow safari, Really? I said that you should go in thinking that there are third parties, not that every game had third parties.
READ!
highscore
Image
User avatar
Major crazymilkshake5
 
Posts: 745
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2011 3:30 pm
Location: Georgia.

Re: Two Sides Mafia: Side A, Day One!

Postby safariguy5 on Wed Mar 21, 2012 11:12 pm

crazymilkshake5 wrote:Wow safari, Really? I said that you should go in thinking that there are third parties, not that every game had third parties.
READ!

Why would I do that? Let's tick off the possible third party characters.

SKer-will be shown by multiple nightkills
Survivor-pretty low on the town threat list
Cult-Difficult to detect, but may have night flavor.
Jester/Lyncher-Not too important and should become clear at some point.

Give me a break, why would I assume third party in every game? Just because there are a few games where we do have third parties, it doesn't mean that I go into every game paranoid that there is an SKer/Cult. If there are third party players, that should become apparent after a few days. To go in already convinced that there are third party players is just over paranoid.

Let's look at some recently finished games shall we?

NBC- no third party
Office Mafia- no third party
Italian Style Mafia- no third party (2 mafia factions)

Not to mention all C9 and open setup games.

Your belief that there are third party players in this game has no backing, and frankly, I would be more interested in lynching mafia than I would third party because I'm pretty sure there are mafia in this game while third party players are less certain.
Image
User avatar
Captain safariguy5
 
Posts: 1449
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 9:42 pm
Location: California

Re: Two Sides Mafia: Side A, Day One!

Postby Rodion on Thu Mar 22, 2012 12:11 am

crazymilkshake5 wrote:
Rodion wrote:Soundman, Shield, New Guy, Milkshake, Clever, VS - anything you'd like to say?


You Asked if i had anything id like to say, and just before you had said the quoted phrase, you had questions, so I felt like they were directed at me.


new guy1 wrote:fastposted- That is a good point, Im sure it was just a misunderstanding.


@New Guy - This is growing into a game of severe misunderstandings, all of them coincidentally being made by players that vote me. Crazy, isn't it? ;)

@Milkshake

The question right after Edocsil's quote was aimed at Edocsil.

The question preceeded by @Jonty was aimed at Jonty (just like I'm aiming this part of my post at you by writing @Milkshake).

The "anything you'd like to say?" question was an open one to several players, including you. It was your chance to, for instance:
a) comment on DM's case on Jonty
b) comment on Saf's case on Shield
c) realize that if nothing changed I'd be lynched tomorrow and voice your will to hear my claim

Basically, your chance to take a stance on the game after being absent for so many days. Instead you decided to answer a rhetorical question aimed at Edocsil and fail to answer a question aimed at Jonty.

Oh, the misunderstandings...
User avatar
General Rodion
 
Posts: 1380
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 5:33 pm
Location: São Paulo, Brazil

Re: Two Sides Mafia: Side A, Day One!

Postby soundman on Thu Mar 22, 2012 12:56 am

I just keep getting the sense that CMS is trying to look townish by answering easy questions that really don't add substance to the game. I also don't see how he could have misunderstood who the question was addressed to. It clearly showed that Edocsil was the intended recipient. The one thing I'm sure of is Rodion should not be lynched. Through all this I'm getting the sense that he is town and not mafia.
User avatar
Lieutenant soundman
 
Posts: 450
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 12:36 pm
Location: Washington

PreviousNext

Return to Mafia Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users