Moderator: Community Team
Endgame422 wrote:Dakky you just like dying D1.
You wanna hardline on lynching the dayvig?
He will kill someone voting against him for sure in the attempt to survive.
Basically lynching epi means he will kill someone random and claimless and we learn 0.
Iron Butterfly wrote:JamesKer1 wrote:I'm Unvoting Epi for obvious reasons.
16 Players and equal party size means there's at least one more 3rd party member.
I find it higly unlikely this is a game of 7/7/2
The bandwagon on Epi is a prime example of blood in the water. There are shy Sharks and agressive Sharks. Every shark has its goal. Epis crime was trying to stimulate discussion. I find it ludicous that people are crying foul over role fishing when we all know damn well that our main goal is to find out who is who. Unlike mafia, where the goal is to scum hunt, the goal here is to have ones party be lasrt party standing.
So lets cut the crap about Epi role fishing...you friggin hypocrites. Ohh wait we are politicians it's second nature.
The first person who really jumped out for Epis blood has been Tonk. He stood back and pounded Epi for role fishing.
I ask Tonka this question. "How does one find out players roles for the betterment of their party KNOWING this is not a standard mafia game?" Do we all sit around with our thumbs up our arse waiting for night time in hopes that peoples night action may offer clues?
As far as some thinking the Streaker vote may hold clues...again....I think the majority wanted someone other then themselves to see what it was all about. My hats off to Streaker for carrying the Mantle not knowing where it will take him.
But if you want blood for role fishing why not James Ker for trying to start a band wagon to get Streaker to claim.
Vote Jamesker
NoSurvivors wrote:I will probably try to be more active day 2, this is just boring as heck honestly as I cant see us getting anywhere until we lynch someone. Epi's the best option here because of his jump of the gun trying to role fish and then backing off in like his next post.
StorrZerg wrote:i find no joy in this
Endgame422 wrote:Cant agree AoG,although i do agree with how you think this is set-up.
Id rather have epi as an ally then as a corpse.
If hes lying and has some ulterior motives he can be lynched pretty much whenever,hes out in the open and without a party to back him up short of making a deal.
Endgame422 wrote:Low risk/low reward.
We lynch epi,he shoots either you or dakky probably and tomorrow we know what?
Only that whichever party you/dakky belongs to is down a vote.
Endgame422 wrote:Plan B: Epi agrees to back me,i claim my party and that my party has the advantage and everyone claims the same party as i did to avoid being lynched and we play it traditional mafia style with some people trying to lie about alignment.
Stephan Wayne wrote:Every day is Fool's Day on CC.
Ragian wrote:I don't agree with the "case" on epi so I'm not going to vote for him at this point. Some seem to push him for rolefishing which I kind of see how he was going towards, but I think it was more a case of "what would be the smartest thing to do in this situation" rather than "I need to know where the good PRs are". I think it's somewhat weird that some of those voting for epi are saying that alignment, not roles is of importance. By that logic, rolefishing becomes irrelevant.
Epitaph1 wrote:Iron Butterfly wrote:JamesKer1 wrote:I'm Unvoting Epi for obvious reasons.
16 Players and equal party size means there's at least one more 3rd party member.
So lets cut the crap about Epi role fishing...you friggin hypocrites. Ohh wait we are politicians it's second nature.
![]()
Thank you, IB. I wish you were around during that wagon.
Epitaph1 wrote:Yeah, if you guys vote for me, I have nothing to lose and will just kill one of the people voting for me--probably one of the first since it will demonstrate my power early. You gain no information, like others have said. So, let's make a deal instead.
<cut>
dakky - Votes and asks for an alignment claim right after I claimed. Either didn't want to re-write his post when I fastposted him or skimmed my post. http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 5#p4701565
<cut>
AoG, NoS, JamesKer, and dakky are the weakest votes on my wagon. I'd go with AoG or NoS first.
Endgame422 wrote:Plan A: 1 claim from both major parties,3rd party basically decides who gets lynched,with epi hopefully backing my party.
Plan B: Epi agrees to back me,i claim my party and that my party has the advantage and everyone claims the same party as i did to avoid being lynched and we play it traditional mafia style with some people trying to lie about alignment.
Endgame422 wrote:Im ok with plan B.
This one still relies on epi(or other 3rd party) agreeing to play for my party in exchange for not being killed.
If we want to go this route you 3rd party types ought to come out and say who you are sooner then later.
Best chance of survival is if 3rd party plays trying to get a win for my party(which essentially becomes town)
Is this the route we want to go?
persianempire wrote:its when ur food goes bad... you get spoils
Army of GOD wrote:Normal scumtells won't give us anything in this game if my guess about the setup is correct. Because there isn't any scum. There are two ewual parties and some third parties
So our options are lynch epi and he kills someone at random or lynch someone else at random...I'd rather take my options with the first option, at least we get rid of a claimed third party. I don't really believe the survivor claim...
Endgame422 wrote:Dakky if i claim,you will know for sure if we are the same party ot not.
Anyone who votes to lynch me will be fairly obviously the other party/3rd party.
Iron Butterfly wrote:LOL wouldn"t it be funny if we had some Anarchists?? They would make a lovely faction akin to mafia. So please spare us the theory craft. None of us have any idea until we find out.
No offense AoG but your statement makes lovely cover for those who may be against the status quo "as we think it may be"
Endgame422 wrote:Dakky if i claim,you will know for sure if we are the same party ot not.
Anyone who votes to lynch me will be fairly obviously the other party/3rd party.
Endgame422 wrote:Ok IB.
What do you think we should do instead?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users