Moderator: Community Team
codierose wrote:Nebuchadnezer wrote:Fastposted by Iron Butterfly.
sorry what does this mean
how this all got turned on me baffles me but i will respond when i bet home on my computer
@pershy you like to fos one way and vote another anyways will respond in a couple of hours
Iron Butterfly wrote:codierose wrote:Nebuchadnezer wrote:Fastposted by Iron Butterfly.
sorry what does this mean
how this all got turned on me baffles me but i will respond when i bet home on my computer
@pershy you like to fos one way and vote another anyways will respond in a couple of hours
Nothing has been turned. I just pointed out that if you beleive someone is guilty or not guilty say so. Your post implies skummy behavior or outright guilt on several people BUT you hedge it and ask for other people to make the call.
If your going to make a case..make a case. Dont make one and then hide behind, "Im really not sure..what does everyone else thinkl"
What gets me is that you imply that I look suspicious defending Cat, while at the same time you give Cod an alibi to explain his behavior if he does turn out to be Mafia.
codierose wrote:cool cheers
does anyone else think the quick votes on me seem scummy or is it just me thought i was just asking normal question to someone that was acting possibly defensive didn't think it was that much of a deal otherwise i would have voted for her. Pershy you also posted same time as me saying she was being defensive but your not scummy i am your vote is some what week and just following IBs lead now thats scummy if i ever seen it
for that case i vote pershy
@ IB not avoiding your case will come to that when i get home
soundman wrote:This is probably the best Day 2 I've ever been a part of. Three cases!
Codie - The case on him is all based on his first post where he asked if Edocsil died because of the hot seat comment. I find it slightly scummy that he only posted one line with the intent (at least is looks that way) of throwing suspicion on Cat. Without a vote of FOS it looks to me like he is trying to get a wagon started without being the first voter and hence hopefully avoiding pressure later if Cat turns out to be town. Also above he comments asking if anyone else thinks all the quick votes on him are scummy when in fact there are only two votes on him and both came after quite a bit of discussion.
Vote Codierose
tenbar wrote:Allright, we are making progress.
Stop fogging you silly Dane or i am gonna FOS ya (HUUUUUGE HUGS!)
Cod was mighty fast on cat, which usually points to one of two things: scum looking to start a frenzy, or knowledge based on a nightime investigation.
Could go either way in my books. Cat claims some kind of town, But we dont know about cod yet. We are heading towards forcing a claim from him...is this we want?
Worth noting too that inna-gadda-da-vida jumped quickly to cat's defense...could be a scummate protecting his own. Not saying for sure, just pointing ot that we need to keep this in mind for when we find out what cat is.
I think we got cat or cod at this point, as they are likely on opposite sides...but which one?
codierose wrote:you started off with good argument now you changed you mind following the scum lead like you said on opposite sides but which one so you went with follow the leader
was hoping not to claim but hell loads are submarining as per norm like every game
i am town cop
n1 investigation was cat due to hammer and edocs post and yes the reason for my first post hoping somebody else would pick up on it. Guess not.
you hit nail on head tenbar but yet forced me to claim well done anyway cat result is guilty what have you got to say for yourself cat?
also i will need protecting tonight at least we should have a few scum tells from all this shit
Nebuchadnezer wrote:Catnip...I was hoping for more of a post from you. Of course, if you're guilty, what can you say? Right?
codierose wrote:cat you putting me on l1 confirms it i was willing to give you benefit of dought last time i was cop i had a wrong investigations
Iron Butterfly wrote:Unvote Cod
Cod I kindly ask that you be aware of how you write your ideas and arguments. They are very hard to understand at times.
Cat needs a better defense then You lie.
Let the fun begin
MoB Deadly wrote:Okay - The result, they BOTH look scummy, but are on opposite sides.
Cat - If she is new to being part of the mafia, she wouldn't know the repercussions of hammering. I could see this happening. Also got defensive.
Codie - Jumped out of the gate on her. Could be the gameplan mafia talked about overnight. Also a scumslip mistake. OR. he was really excited about his investigation and couldnt hold it in. who knows. ALSO - if you got a guilty result why on earth would u switch your vote to Pershy. that makes zero sense. You deflected because you were getting pressured.
Pershy - Noted for future reference.
No matter how scummy the cop looks, I gotta go with him until there is a counter claim.
vote cat - we will need a claim from you.
codierose wrote:cat you putting me on l1 confirms it i was willing to give you benefit of dought last time i was cop i had a wrong investigations
codierose wrote:mob the other reason was that i thought cat could have been framed i saw that in another game thats why i only put the one liner there for my first post just to see reactions the more i think about it my second post was a really noob post
sorry for the double post
Iron Butterfly wrote:.
NO! Why would we need a claim from her? We already have a 50 50 shot. If we vote Cod and he is guilty youve exposed a possible power role. we have eleven people left, which means there are at least 3 mafia left. if She claims and claims VT they work around her. if she claims a power role she puts a target on her.
If she is mafia she will lie...if she is town and claims that would only help mafia to decide who to nightkill.
I have read her argument and I find her beleivable. In fact if she flips scum you can lynch me next round..THATS how sure I am.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users