Moderator: Community Team
Some7hingCLEVER wrote:ok so if you guys come up with a good foolproof way to test him ill unvote but until then im staying with this cause he is just way to scummy
new guy1 wrote:Some7hingCLEVER wrote:ok so if you guys come up with a good foolproof way to test him ill unvote but until then im staying with this cause he is just way to scummy
the way to test him is simple, you just get him to investigate (i believe thats what they call his action) someone and he will see if they go anywhere (i think??). he can say where they went and if the person shows up dead, obviously it was either a cop who was late, or it was the mafia member (more likely). i believe i have the role correct, but if i dont please correct me.
new guy1 wrote:he has to say they didnt go anywhere, and if they confirm VT then hes fine and if they say no they visited someone last night then hes obviously lieing.
Some7hingCLEVER wrote:ok so if you guys come up with a good foolproof way to test him ill unvote but until then im staying with this cause he is just way to scummy
jak111 wrote:I love how many people are PROTECTING Isaiah's claim, either isaiah is scum or someone who is helping him is. Or both.
Here let me break it down for you.
-You tell him to investigate someone and they turn up dead he will just say that the mafia killed him for either we pointed him/her out or because it was a random mafia kill
-His role without having any investagators (If you are one shut up for at least 2 days so you can get us some damn info) cannot be proved right. <.< Sure he could investigate someone and he says something, the other person says something different, either of them could be mafia, who are you gonna believe and risk killing your own? And a tracker is worthless in my eyes 50% of the time <.< What if someone with an investagator role visits someone the same night as the mafia, are you gonna risk killing a good legit power role?
So if you believe him now and he turns out to be mafia, and you don't know about it because you chose to believe him, are you gonna kill someone else by what he says? Or he's good and he checks someone who might've been bussed (happened in our last game because I bussed two people, a and the tracker targeted one person who targeted who I switched the targeted person with that he saw him target himself due to the bussing BUT he targeted the other person that I bussed as well, not seeing who THAT personn targeted in the first place) so he gets an innocent person targeting someone who was killed but in reality he was really checking the other bussed player... See where I'm going? Tracker can be useless at times and good at others.
Until someone can confirm his role legit, I'm going to keep my lynch vote on him. His role to me in my one full game experience isn't as powerful as you all try to make it out to be, it can be turned around and kill innocent people, or what I'm thinking and a few others are, is that he's making it up... Who's to say there IS a tracker in the game?
jonty125 wrote:
Who's to say there isn't?
soundman wrote:Vote count:
SPARTACUS1974
crazymilkshake5
isaiah40 - jak111, thehippo, CMS, some7, spartacus - (L4)
thehippo8
Victor Sullivan
Some7hingCLEVER - isaiah - (L8)
TeeGee
new guy1
ghostly447 - newguy - (L8)
NoSurvivors
Gilligan
kiwi3 - Leehar - (L8)
Leehar
jak111
jonty125
Nebuchadnezer
With 16 alive it takes 9 to make someone walk the plank.
Deadline: None yet. We'll see how this day goes.
kiwi3 wrote:i guess the question now is "Are or will any claims be believable?" If someone claims then someone else just says they are lying. Is there a way to prove anyone's claim with out lynching them? I have read and reread the past few pages several times. I think we have a boat of politicians!
Nebuchadnezer wrote:Yes!!! First time I get to use this! Jak, your entire argument is...wait for it...WIFOM. All we have to go on is his claim. Everything else is guessing. By your argument there are no good power roles as they can all be blocked, bused, etc. and I explained why I initially voted him...and I was right on. I'm not sure what your added "pressure" will do. He's claimed. Do you want him to claim again? Maybe put it in fancy letters...
He could well be mafia, but we've got info on his claim as well as votes on record. Push for the lynch if you will, but I won't be in on it. Does that make me mafia? Or a townie who wants info from another source?
Some7hingCLEVER wrote:Nebuchadnezer wrote:Yes!!! First time I get to use this! Jak, your entire argument is...wait for it...WIFOM. All we have to go on is his claim. Everything else is guessing. By your argument there are no good power roles as they can all be blocked, bused, etc. and I explained why I initially voted him...and I was right on. I'm not sure what your added "pressure" will do. He's claimed. Do you want him to claim again? Maybe put it in fancy letters...
He could well be mafia, but we've got info on his claim as well as votes on record. Push for the lynch if you will, but I won't be in on it. Does that make me mafia? Or a townie who wants info from another source?
Uhhh thats exactly what he did...thats exactly why i think he is scummy
isaiah40 wrote:Some7hingCLEVER wrote:Nebuchadnezer wrote:Yes!!! First time I get to use this! Jak, your entire argument is...wait for it...WIFOM. All we have to go on is his claim. Everything else is guessing. By your argument there are no good power roles as they can all be blocked, bused, etc. and I explained why I initially voted him...and I was right on. I'm not sure what your added "pressure" will do. He's claimed. Do you want him to claim again? Maybe put it in fancy letters...
He could well be mafia, but we've got info on his claim as well as votes on record. Push for the lynch if you will, but I won't be in on it. Does that make me mafia? Or a townie who wants info from another source?
Uhhh thats exactly what he did...thats exactly why i think he is scummy
Uh!? What!? You think I'm scummy because I claimed??? Now that doesn't make sense at all. Well I'm really thinking that you're mafia now!
thehippo8 wrote:isaiah40 wrote:Some7hingCLEVER wrote:Nebuchadnezer wrote:Yes!!! First time I get to use this! Jak, your entire argument is...wait for it...WIFOM. All we have to go on is his claim. Everything else is guessing. By your argument there are no good power roles as they can all be blocked, bused, etc. and I explained why I initially voted him...and I was right on. I'm not sure what your added "pressure" will do. He's claimed. Do you want him to claim again? Maybe put it in fancy letters...
He could well be mafia, but we've got info on his claim as well as votes on record. Push for the lynch if you will, but I won't be in on it. Does that make me mafia? Or a townie who wants info from another source?
Uhhh thats exactly what he did...thats exactly why i think he is scummy
Uh!? What!? You think I'm scummy because I claimed??? Now that doesn't make sense at all. Well I'm really thinking that you're mafia now!
No that's just being weird Isaiah! From my perspective my vote is on you because you claimed as a cabin boy then claimed as a tracker and generally acted scummy. Whilst I can appreciate that you are not happy about the vote, put yourself in my shoes. Would you believe you from this point on? How would you prove to you that you are not scum? What plan have you got that could possibly help the rest of us? What would you say you should do in your shoes?? That is, enough with the flailing and give me something so I can trust you for the future!!
thehippo8 wrote:No that's just being weird Isaiah! From my perspective my vote is on you because you claimed as a cabin boy then claimed as a tracker and generally acted scummy. Whilst I can appreciate that you are not happy about the vote, put yourself in my shoes. Would you believe you from this point on? How would you prove to you that you are not scum? What plan have you got that could possibly help the rest of us? What would you say you should do in your shoes?? That is, enough with the flailing and give me something so I can trust you for the future!!
Nebuchadnezer wrote:Yes!!! First time I get to use this! Jak, your entire argument is...wait for it...WIFOM. All we have to go on is his claim. Everything else is guessing. By your argument there are no good power roles as they can all be blocked, bused, etc. and I explained why I initially voted him...and I was right on. I'm not sure what your added "pressure" will do. He's claimed. Do you want him to claim again? Maybe put it in fancy letters...
He could well be mafia, but we've got info on his claim as well as votes on record. Push for the lynch if you will, but I won't be in on it. Does that make me mafia? Or a townie who wants info from another source?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users