I just tried to review this entire thread in a methodical way... I did not succeed. However, I did find a few interesting quotes...
HotShot53 wrote:Thorthoth wrote:So not posting is bad because... why?
Scum often tries to not get noticed by not posting... you can't get caught making a slip in your post if you don't post, right? Often the more someone posts, the more you can make a case about them, right or wrong. While if someone doesn't post there isn't much to base a case on. So to discourage scum being inactive (and because it does often catch scum), it's common to vote barely active players for "scummarining"
If not posting is poor sportsmanship as well as possibly being scummy, maybe we should lynch a non-poster.
Note, I'm feeling more vehement about this because every time I do post about
anything at allI seem to get myself in trouble.
If we want to encourage participation, then let's not reward these non-participators. If they never get lynched I'm going to walk away from this with a firm conviction that lurking is the way to go.
Roght now, voting for a non-poster means voting for Fircoal. Is that right?
Continuing on, I'm now looking more closely at the Day 2 posts to see who knows what. The first thing that catches my eye is this.
Pikanchion wrote:So I'd say it's fairly safe to assume the Thorian is a Third Party with cult mechanics at this point, presumably the only one that's active right now (save for presumably a convertee). The lack of night kill is certainly interesting also, Saren's team surely has a night kill, so it seems this was prevented somehow. On the off-chance that this kill was prevented via roleblock rather than a doctor or bulletproof (or similar) role I would say the probable cult is currently the greater threat of the two, although there's not much for me to go on to try and discover who either are at this point.
Any leads?
How the heck does Pika come to this conclusion about the Thorian? I'd like him to explain his evidence and reasoning better.
BTW, This is slightly embarassing, but I will admit that many posts ago when I asked what a Thorian was, it was because I thought it was just another misspelled nickname for me (not 'ME', me)

.
More questions:
Another thing from Day 2 is that Benga claims that IAC was jailed. Is that definitely known or could that be a bluff?
If a player is jailed he can't do anything but neither can he be killed, Is that right?
Does a scum have to kill every night, or would/could he choose not to for some reason?
Samlen also brings up some interesting points. Is there more than one scum that kills? If so, then blocking or jailing one player wouldn't prove anything...
Samlen wrote:@thor You have to weigh the weight of your role versus the weight of your information when revealing your action. For example: If the cop found a town-sided player night one, they would likely not want to reveal(yet) since the risk of them dying to scum is not worth clearing one player. On that note, I didn't learn anything useful last night. I think it's more likely that the scum kill was prevented by a roleblocker or the jailing of caff since doc save requires two actions to hit same target instead of just one. We can debate about the merits about jailing caff again, but mafia can usually choose who carries out the nightkill, making it unlikely that jailing him (if he's mafia) will do anything. It'll be a bit harder to figure out who to lynch considering no death but caff being jailed or a different person being roleblocked are our best bets (barring any wonky roles).
I would like to have an overwhelming reason for voting for somebody, but I actually do not ... but I will try to learn more.
1. Pikanchion - interesting claims made.
2. Ragian
3. Strike Wolf
4. Madmitch
5. Dakky
6. Skittles
7. Fircoal - no posts.
8. Samlen - interesting claims made.
9. Minister Masket
10. Benga - interesting claims made.
11. Hotshot
12. Thortoth
13. DoomYoshi
14. Lord Moldybutt
15. iAmCaffeine - interesting claims made.
16. Tailgunner
17. Skoffin