
Anyway, I'll roleclaim, if just because It's incredibly ironic. Wait for it... I'm a survivor.

Moderator: Community Team
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
ace1217 wrote:Innervision wrote:So a military technician goes to work on a firing range. He's given a rifle and some rounds, and he starts to fire at the target. When he's done, the report comes back that he's missed every single time.
The technician looks at his rifle, looks at the target. Rifle. Target. Rifle. Target. Finally, he puts a finger in front of the rifle and fires a shot, blowing his finger off.
He looks towards the target and yells 'Well, it's leaving here fine, the problem must be on your end!'
WTF is this? Someone needs to figure out who said this and how its important
Ditocoaf wrote:right. I'm Thucydides, a historian. That's why I have to take the vote counts.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
icedagger wrote: Vote DIto Sorry dito but if we're gonna let people off after a survivor claim we'll never get to night one
icedagger wrote: Vote DIto Sorry dito but if we're gonna let people off after a survivor claim we'll never get to night one
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
icedagger wrote:He's claimed survivor, if we were certain he was a survivor of course I wouldn't vote him. And we'd be better off if the mafia targeted him, survivor with no power is pretty much the role we can afford to lose most..
My point is, if someone's got to the point where they need to roleclaim, their role needs to be better than survior to avert a lynch. Or we'll end up with everyone claimed and no one lynched.. it's not hard to fake a role in a game like this
Skoffin wrote:F1fth wrote:If you wanna know why people are voting you right now, it's this kind of behavior. When some people voted for a new guy (I don't even think they were serious votes), you got pissy with them. Some people voted you, you got pissy with them. And now you're going to quit the game because of it?
How immature. You're taking this freaking game personally, and if you don't see that THAT is the problem here, I guess you have a lot of growing up to do.
Quoted because F1fth has also 'gotten pissy and quitted mafia over it'![]()
Actually, I think I've done the same thing..several times. So Frankly I'm not sure whether Dito is absolutely serious or if he'll cool off by tomorrow and continue on.
Anyway, I'll start prodding players in the morning.
F1fth wrote:icedagger wrote:He's claimed survivor, if we were certain he was a survivor of course I wouldn't vote him. And we'd be better off if the mafia targeted him, survivor with no power is pretty much the role we can afford to lose most..
My point is, if someone's got to the point where they need to roleclaim, their role needs to be better than survior to avert a lynch. Or we'll end up with everyone claimed and no one lynched.. it's not hard to fake a role in a game like this
Indeed it is easy to fake a claim, but still I would rather lynch scum than town/third party. And I not sure if this is what you're saying, but are suggesting he lie about his role? If anything, that hurts the town more than anything. I would much rather wait one night on an investigative role than to lynch someone who can do no harm to the town. And that's besides the fact that if he is a survivor, that doesn't help town at all to kill him at this point.
Unvote Dito
FOS icedagger for pushing a non-scum lynch.
Fircoal wrote:Dito, don't leave. You're cool
sheepofdumb wrote:I'm not scum, just a threat to the town. There's a difference, thank you very much.
ga7 wrote: I'll keep my vote where it should be but just in case Vote Strike Wolf AND f*ck FLAMINGOS f*ck THEM HARD
william18 wrote:The1exile wrote:you guys do know that the kirby eat isn't actually like eating them and them dying, right?
What do yuo mean?
sheepofdumb wrote:I'm not scum, just a threat to the town. There's a difference, thank you very much.
ga7 wrote: I'll keep my vote where it should be but just in case Vote Strike Wolf AND f*ck FLAMINGOS f*ck THEM HARD
Ditocoaf wrote: Also, I was only doing the vote counts to set myself up for this fake claim.
sheepofdumb wrote:I'm not scum, just a threat to the town. There's a difference, thank you very much.
ga7 wrote: I'll keep my vote where it should be but just in case Vote Strike Wolf AND f*ck FLAMINGOS f*ck THEM HARD
ace1217 wrote:How many votes need to be in dito before he gets lynched?
william18 wrote:What do yuo mean?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users