Moderator: Community Team
safariguy5 wrote:edocsil wrote:Iron Butterfly wrote:Even if we had a third sk night one your ability would be useless with this format. I find it hard to believe that the mod would make such a detailed night scene by describing how the killers killed their victims and then include your role thinking it would be useful. The night scenes already tell us what the killers used...DUH.
QFT Scenes are too explicit to have this role in the game. I want verification of Saf's actions and Jak's claim before proceeding, but this is the proper direction IMO.
I will say that it's possible chap doesn't have a night action so he can't necessarily confirm me, but with 2 claimed blocking roles, I'm perfectly willing to no lynch today and roleblock Epitaph and suggest that IB jailkeeps jak.
I mean, I'm 90% sure jak is Dexter at this point, and if he indeed is overeager/anti town, then we would like to keep the town numbers up if possible.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
edocsil wrote:At 6 alive a NL is the standard. The only reason this isn't already being done is because it isn't mylo, not with the twin killers. Also, I think you are reading too much into some of the scenes. The arsonist just wants to kill everyone by my guess, and dex is the arsonists greatest threat.
Epitaph1 wrote:If you mislynch me and there are 2 NKs, that will potentially leave 1 townie and 2 SKs. That's game over. If we're lucky and IB jails one of the SKs, we're still looking at 2 v 2, although we'll know who to lynch tomorrow. That would still leave IB to guess on the final SK and give us a 50-50 shot at winning on N5.
So, what are you going to do when chap comes in an says he wasn't roleblocked? Saf has already started thinking of his excuse for when that happens. Are you still go along with saf's story even though no one can confirm it? That's bad play. We are going to be forced into a situation where the town must decided between two unverifiable roles and will have to ask 'who has been the scummiest this game?' I think we all know the answer to that question.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
safariguy5 wrote:One does not stick to flawed logic. Once logic is flawed, one revises the theory.
Iron Butterfly wrote:Claim. We have been waiting almost a week. If you have been reading you know where we are in game. We are also fully aware of what Chap has said so there is no more need to rehash old crap. You have done no us no favors with your last post.
Iron Butterfly wrote:Iron Butterfly wrote:Claim. We have been waiting almost a week. If you have been reading you know where we are in game. We are also fully aware of what Chap has said so there is no more need to rehash old crap. You have done no us no favors with your last post.
"We are also fully aware of what Chap has said so there is no more need to rehash old crap."
It should read Safari instead of Chap.
Claim already Chap.
chapcrap wrote:Iron Butterfly wrote:Iron Butterfly wrote:Claim. We have been waiting almost a week. If you have been reading you know where we are in game. We are also fully aware of what Chap has said so there is no more need to rehash old crap. You have done no us no favors with your last post.
"We are also fully aware of what Chap has said so there is no more need to rehash old crap."
It should read Safari instead of Chap.
Claim already Chap.
I'm not claiming because you want to whine about it. I already know that YOU feel I should claim. You said it already. I'm not rehashing old crap either. The VTs were not dead when I last posted and I was stating where I stood.
chapcrap wrote:Iron Butterfly wrote:Iron Butterfly wrote:Claim. We have been waiting almost a week. If you have been reading you know where we are in game. We are also fully aware of what Chap has said so there is no more need to rehash old crap. You have done no us no favors with your last post.
"We are also fully aware of what Chap has said so there is no more need to rehash old crap."
It should read Safari instead of Chap.
Claim already Chap.
I'm not claiming because you want to whine about it. I already know that YOU feel I should claim. You said it already. I'm not rehashing old crap either. The VTs were not dead when I last posted and I was stating where I stood.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
chapcrap wrote:I'm just a VT... Let me go look at my PM real quick, because I don't remember the name. My name is Gabriel Bosque. So, I can't confirm anything that safari said.
I'm not being obstinate about anything. I wanted more people to respond to me than crappy response that you gave. You didn't care anything about what I said, you only wanted a claim and ignored my post completely. So, yeah, I didn't care about what you had to say, just like you didn't care about what I had to say.
Epitaph1 wrote:Hilarious. Safari 'roleblocked' a VT. Suffice it to say, this just another example of his crumbling facade of a claim.
I won't belabor the point, as I've already said plenty about safari's guilt, but I guess we need to see where the rest of the non-voters stand. We're going to be in dire straights if we don't get this right and there are 2 SKs running around. If we're lucky, edoc and IB will be successful in their blocks, but that is being very optimistic.
Where is jak?
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Epitaph1 wrote:Hilarious. Safari 'roleblocked' a VT. Suffice it to say, this just another example of his crumbling facade of a claim.
I won't belabor the point, as I've already said plenty about safari's guilt, but I guess we need to see where the rest of the non-voters stand. We're going to be in dire straights if we don't get this right and there are 2 SKs running around. If we're lucky, edoc and IB will be successful in their blocks, but that is being very optimistic.
Where is jak?
Iron Butterfly wrote:Epitaph1 wrote:Hilarious. Safari 'roleblocked' a VT. Suffice it to say, this just another example of his crumbling facade of a claim.
I won't belabor the point, as I've already said plenty about safari's guilt, but I guess we need to see where the rest of the non-voters stand. We're going to be in dire straights if we don't get this right and there are 2 SKs running around. If we're lucky, edoc and IB will be successful in their blocks, but that is being very optimistic.
Where is jak?
Being a role blocker does not give any insight into the role one is blocking. Granted it does not help him prove he is who he says he is.
You on the other hand have claimed a role that has absolute zero use given the way the mod has conducted the game. You expect us to believe he would include a forensics investigator/cop role when he has been telling us in the night scenes how the killers kill their victims? I think you are the one who has the biggest chance of being a liar and SK.
Epitaph1 wrote:Iron Butterfly wrote:Epitaph1 wrote:Hilarious. Safari 'roleblocked' a VT. Suffice it to say, this just another example of his crumbling facade of a claim.
I won't belabor the point, as I've already said plenty about safari's guilt, but I guess we need to see where the rest of the non-voters stand. We're going to be in dire straights if we don't get this right and there are 2 SKs running around. If we're lucky, edoc and IB will be successful in their blocks, but that is being very optimistic.
Where is jak?
Being a role blocker does not give any insight into the role one is blocking. Granted it does not help him prove he is who he says he is.
You on the other hand have claimed a role that has absolute zero use given the way the mod has conducted the game. You expect us to believe he would include a forensics investigator/cop role when he has been telling us in the night scenes how the killers kill their victims? I think you are the one who has the biggest chance of being a liar and SK.
I'm familiar with the mechanics of a roleblocker. I think that safari has been lying all along.
Like I've said before, I'm working with the cards that I was dealt. Strike had the same role in the last game, so I'm not surprised we have it in this game as well. Yeah, it seems like the scenes make my role irrelevant, but perhaps this would be an entirely different ballgame with the third SK in play. We don't know if any of the SKs have any abilities beyond just killing, so I'm still holding out hope that my role will have some utility after all.
Epitaph1 wrote:Iron Butterfly wrote:Epitaph1 wrote:Hilarious. Safari 'roleblocked' a VT. Suffice it to say, this just another example of his crumbling facade of a claim.
I won't belabor the point, as I've already said plenty about safari's guilt, but I guess we need to see where the rest of the non-voters stand. We're going to be in dire straights if we don't get this right and there are 2 SKs running around. If we're lucky, edoc and IB will be successful in their blocks, but that is being very optimistic.
Where is jak?
Being a role blocker does not give any insight into the role one is blocking. Granted it does not help him prove he is who he says he is.
You on the other hand have claimed a role that has absolute zero use given the way the mod has conducted the game. You expect us to believe he would include a forensics investigator/cop role when he has been telling us in the night scenes how the killers kill their victims? I think you are the one who has the biggest chance of being a liar and SK.
I'm familiar with the mechanics of a roleblocker. I think that safari has been lying all along.
Like I've said before, I'm working with the cards that I was dealt. Strike had the same role in the last game, so I'm not surprised we have it in this game as well. Yeah, it seems like the scenes make my role irrelevant, but perhaps this would be an entirely different ballgame with the third SK in play. We don't know if any of the SKs have any abilities beyond just killing, so I'm still holding out hope that my role will have some utility after all.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users