Moderator: Community Team
BGtheBrain wrote:Im trying to think of how the game might be setup.
So, I think we may have ISIS (cult) and NATO (town) and villagers (town-sided survivors)
With this setup, I think its plausible that we may havea vigilante that HAS to kill each night. This to me indicates that the person who did the shooting wouldve been on the Epi wagon, believing they are doing something in towns best interest. It also explains the scene (I think).
This is a stretch, but Im trying to figure out just what we're up against here.
DoomYoshi wrote:
vote talapus
You lying sack of cunt!
Tobikera wrote:Ragian wrote:I agree that mitch is the obvious answer. However, let's not jump the gun before everyone has had a chance to pitch in. From the looks of it, ISIS can't kill, but only recruit, yes? Like a cult.
Epi was killed last night, so someone is killing. Who called in the airstrike that killed Epi? Not one of the villagers.
Also, someone appears to have gotten recruited on N1. That's a net loss of three NATO-sided villagers on D1/N1.
If this keeps up, the game will be over quickly.
Something doesn't make sense to me.
Even if we kill one ISIS every day, we potentially stand to lose 2 villagers every night,
one to a straight kill and one to conversion (unless the recruiter can only act on odd nights).
In this scenario, the NATO-sided villagers can't win, because we lose a net 1 villager every night.
Even if we started the game with 13 villagers and one ISIS warrior and one ISIS recruiter,
it will end the same, unless we get lucky and kill the recruiter.
Any other thoughts? I'm not as experienced in mafia games as some of y'all.
Iron Butterfly wrote:[
Interesting.
We have 2 dead survivors. One lynched and one night killed. Why would you say that the one recruited last night was a survivor as well? It is obvious there is NATO.We know there is ISIS. We also know there are Villager Survivors. Survivors can win with anyone so their deaths are not a loss.
madmitch wrote:@ Tobikera ,I do believe PT said he was NATO WITH TWO ALLIES and something about Jordan not be one of them.
madmitch wrote:@ Tobikera ,I do believe PT said he was NATO WITH TWO ALLIES and something about Jordan not be one of them.
WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Tobi, you are missing some obvious information.
The vig is very unlikely to be a villager. And for that reason I shall say no more.
So BG? Is D2 too much of a crapshoot for you to manage to post?
BuJaber wrote:FP'd By Tobikera... The point is that pt claimed to be a full NATO country, not a nato sided villager. We're not saying we don't believe you (I have you down as probable town), just that you're missing things other people have hinted at.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users