Moderator: Community Team
jak111 wrote:jonty125 wrote:jak111 wrote:
For the doctor night kill I'm gonna read over, see who all was against him, which nebuch.. I believe you were.
Hmm, not a very reliable way to decide who mafia is as lets us say one of me and you was to drop down dead. Would it confirm the other was mafia?
No, I'm not saying they ARE mafia, but it definitely makes me watch them more for being one of the ones who wanted him gone for whatever reason.
Also just saying CMS put a FoS on Teegee earlier in the game, so there's another REASON to go after CMS? I'm not saying it's proof, but it is there to keep an eye on what they do next. Still working on a case, and just in case DoomYoshi comes back wondering where I first brought up the NoS case...
Page 17, read it all, go back and check other postings and stuff, I am the FIRST to even mention NoS to vote for.jak111 wrote:My vote stays with him for a lot of reasons.Nebuchadnezer wrote:Yes!!! First time I get to use this! Jak, your entire argument is...wait for it...WIFOM. All we have to go on is his claim. Everything else is guessing. By your argument there are no good power roles as they can all be blocked, bused, etc. and I explained why I initially voted him...and I was right on. I'm not sure what your added "pressure" will do. He's claimed. Do you want him to claim again? Maybe put it in fancy letters...
He could well be mafia, but we've got info on his claim as well as votes on record. Push for the lynch if you will, but I won't be in on it. Does that make me mafia? Or a townie who wants info from another source?
^ THIS is not applicable to the argument, you're trying to put words into peoples' mouths. At this point if others are willing to help I want him lynched. Sure we might be wrong, but if we knew when we were wrong and when we were right we'd win every time would we not? The fact stays not from what his claim is, but how scummy he was about his claim and the scummy-ness leading up to it. 4nd n0 1 d0 n0t w4nt f4ncy l3tt3r5. (<.< Ok, that just sickened me to type like that...) I want someone I can trust/believe/no scum slips/and no beating around the bush... To come up into this roulette going 'round and 'round to come up with a solution, or another legit case. I'm all for the inactive people but WHO are all the inactives? Which shall we pressure? Which do YOU think are most scummiest? Here's the list of inactives I'd have...
5. Victor Sullivan (Same as TeeGee)
7. TeeGee (was active 4-5 pages ago for a post or two.. <.< Not very active)
10. NoSurvivors (Last post was 8 pages ago...)
Bordering inactivity but made a few posts in the later pages...
new guy1 (Paintball)
ghostly447 (same thing as new guy)
Spartacus1973 (I suspect he's reading, but last time he posted was 3-4 pages ago)
Unvote, Vote NoSurvivors
If you're all up tight about isaiah I'll give him a single night chance to find out something for us, which obviously since everyone knows now what he is, he better not lie or it's walking the plank tomorrow.
As for No Survivors... Checking the pages back he's barely said a word, less then ANYONE else in here.. Let me count... he's made 6 posts (That includes the 3-4 completely off topic or sign up posts) in total.. If you want someone to pressure for laying below the radar there's our man.
<.< If any of you bitch about this vote I'll have my eye on you, if all you want is to vote for inactivity because you don't wanna work on the players atm, this is our biggest inactive..
kiwi3 wrote:so you kept him from investigating which was his proof of who he said he was? I'm not quite understanding the logic there? He was forced to claim and given a task as proof. That seems a waste.
jak111 wrote:kiwi3 wrote:so you kept him from investigating which was his proof of who he said he was? I'm not quite understanding the logic there? He was forced to claim and given a task as proof. That seems a waste.
AGREED...
FoS on CLEVER. I was FoS'ing him but not publicly before... now with this he causes it to make no sense... he could be a roleblocker, but a mafia one at that...
kiwi3 wrote:so you kept him from investigating which was his proof of who he said he was? I'm not quite understanding the logic there? He was forced to claim and given a task as proof. That seems a waste.
Nebuchadnezer wrote:jak111 wrote:kiwi3 wrote:so you kept him from investigating which was his proof of who he said he was? I'm not quite understanding the logic there? He was forced to claim and given a task as proof. That seems a waste.
AGREED...
FoS on CLEVER. I was FoS'ing him but not publicly before... now with this he causes it to make no sense... he could be a roleblocker, but a mafia one at that...
Would you two think about this for a moment? Why would clever block isaiah, then admit to it publicly if he was mafia. If he was mafia, he would have stayed hidden and laughed his butt off while you two continue the charge against him. It was a no lose situation for him, if he was mafia.
While I don't agree with clevers thinking, I do think he's being honest.
So go put your FOS back in it's holster...we all know you like to throw accusations out non stop
Some7hingCLEVER wrote:Sounds good jak111 but that would be assuming your town
jak111 wrote:Some7hingCLEVER wrote:Sounds good jak111 but that would be assuming your town
Well again, why would I kill the godfather if I wasn't? Why would I make the case on him?
Some7hingCLEVER wrote:jak111 wrote:Some7hingCLEVER wrote:Sounds good jak111 but that would be assuming your town
Well again, why would I kill the godfather if I wasn't? Why would I make the case on him?
lol ok point taken and just saying...im the one who hammered him ;P
jak111 wrote:Some7hingCLEVER wrote:jak111 wrote:Some7hingCLEVER wrote:Sounds good jak111 but that would be assuming your town
Well again, why would I kill the godfather if I wasn't? Why would I make the case on him?
lol ok point taken and just saying...im the one who hammered him ;P
Yes, but I could WIFOM that sooo bad XD I mean not saying this IS the case, but I could say you saw no other choice but to hammer him since everyone was voting for him (which you resisted and FoS'd hippo for voting for him to put him at L-1 XD)
So yes it's good and bad, but I am thankful for the hammer, it finally let us proceed with the game a step.
Some7hingCLEVER wrote:jak111 wrote:Some7hingCLEVER wrote:Sounds good jak111 but that would be assuming your town
Well again, why would I kill the godfather if I wasn't? Why would I make the case on him?
lol ok point taken and just saying...im the one who hammered him ;P
TeeGee wrote:unfortunately as I mentioned before my absence is due to flooding in my area, more water is expected and I am barely having enough time to play my actual CC games let alone forum games.. replace me if you think its best.
Some7hingCLEVER on Sun Mar 04, 2012 1:15 am
Wow hippo?? Wanna look any more scummier ?
Now my list goes to isiah and hippo for being scummiest
Can someone please take your vote off so he doesn't get hammered
Since hippo was dumb enough to put him in that situation
And while doing so said "time to increase the pressure"
In my opinion the most amount of safe pressure is at l-2 and thats what he was at and u just put him at l-1 so congrats now mafia will probably hammer him
Re: Yo Ho, A Pirate's Life! [13/16] Day Two: Bad or good new
ok. think i understand your thinking now.
by kiwi3
Tue Mar 06, 2012 6:16 pm
Jump to post
Re: Yo Ho, A Pirate's Life! [13/16] Day Two: Bad or good new
i didnt know i fast posted. just regular.
by kiwi3
Tue Mar 06, 2012 6:08 pm
Jump to post
Re: Yo Ho, A Pirate's Life! [13/16] Day Two: Bad or good new
so you kept him from investigating which was his proof of who he said he was? I'm not quite understanding the logic there? He was forced to claim and given a task as proof. That seems a waste.
by kiwi3
Tue Mar 06, 2012 5:16 pm
Jump to post
Re: Yo Ho, A Pirate's Life! [16/16] Day One: Mutiny!
could someone explain what speedhammering is please?
by kiwi3
Sat Mar 03, 2012 2:19 pm
Re: Yo Ho, A Pirate's Life! [16/16] Day One: Mutiny!
ghostly, I understand the time limit. I am in a lot of games. I believe Leehar is too because I think we are in some together but would have to double check. I am trying to read and post something halfway intelligent (which should be of question this since I waste a lot of time on this site). I gues...
by kiwi3
Fri Mar 02, 2012 7:25 pm
Jump to post
Re: Yo Ho, A Pirate's Life! [16/16] Day One: Mutiny!
just curious, but are there equal numbers of mafia: town? I'm still trying to figure out who is who and if one can assume they are equal that may help me. glad to hear that you are around Tee Gee.
by kiwi3
Wed Feb 29, 2012 10:15 pm
Jump to post
Re: Yo Ho, A Pirate's Life! [16/16] Day One: Mutiny!
what about Tee Gee has anyone heard a peep from that one?
by kiwi3
Tue Feb 28, 2012 7:39 pm
Jump to post
Re: Yo Ho, A Pirate's Life! [16/16] Day One: Mutiny!
i guess the question now is "Are or will any claims be believable?" If someone claims then someone else just says they are lying. Is there a way to prove anyone's claim with out lynching them? I have read and reread the past few pages several times. I think we have a boat of politicians!
by kiwi3
Mon Feb 27, 2012 7:03 pm
Jump to post
Re: Yo Ho, A Pirate's Life! [16/16] Day One: Mutiny!
If we are pointing fingers at people who are inactive what about TeeGee? Is that person even on the same ship?
by kiwi3
Mon Feb 27, 2012 6:54 am
Re: Yo Ho, A Pirate's Life! [16/16] Day One: Mutiny!
and what reason for voting for me? I am sitting back watching and taking all this in.
Re: Yo Ho, A Pirate's Life! [16/16] Day One: Mutiny!
yes, i think it is best to sit back and observe a bit before i throw in a vote to have someone walk the plank. It is a serious consequence and I will not vote to have someone walk and then find out later that it was all a "witchhunt". no vote for me as of this point.
by kiwi3
Thu Feb 23, 2012 6:27 am
Re: Yo Ho, A Pirate's Life! [16/16] Confirm Here!
confirm
by kiwi3
Sat Feb 18, 2012 3:19 pm
Re: Yo Ho, A Pirate's Life! [11/16] Taking Signups
i'll be in.
by kiwi3
Fri Feb 10, 2012 11:48 pm
Some7hingCLEVER wrote:look I guess I have to explain further
I blocked him cause it would have been to easy for him to talk to his mafia buddies at night and make a plan to clear himself...this is why I blocked him
If he would have come out said he tracked someone and they didn't go somewhere then i would have caught him in a lie ...by blocking him i made it impossible for him to lie
Users browsing this forum: No registered users