Harry Potter Mafia GAME OVER. Scums win!

[dustn64]

what are you going to say I'm voldemort now

[mandalorian2298]

what are you going to say I'm voldemort now

No, I am plain old voting you for voting left and right like you don't care whom you lynch.

[dustn64]

If I didn't care, why wouldn't I just leave my vote and not post?

[mandalorian2298]

If I didn't care, why wouldn't I just leave my vote and not post?

[gimpyThewonder]

i believe mandy. he is an experienced player and i don't think he would stick his head out this far without solid proof (investigation perhaps?). of course if he is wrong. then we can just lynch him. also even though nagerous claimed a power role i want a real claim before i even think of letting him off the hook. to this point in time his defense has been: " waah waah don't vote for me, he has no evidence" wel i think he must have evidence and so far you have givven me no evidnce that you aren't scum. to that effect:

Vote: nagerous

this is the second time that for dummies has asked for specific role claim/name. the first earned you an fos the second time gets you a
vote for dummies
your asking every player accused to give themselves a target on their heads. its like you want a checklist for all your mafia buds. cop dead - check. doc dead - check. i don't trust you. your only posts have been to ask peeps for their roles, its so scummy i need to go wash my hands

[Fircoal]

WOAH! Long day.

now I'm not sure. Mandy seems to drop the Nagerous case out of random. It seems odd. Maybe he caught onto something. I was thinking that Mandy might be a certain role, but now I'm not as sure. Fos: MAndy Nagerous I think Nagerous's defense was fine for the amount of evidence Mandy put on the table. But I still think that he could be scum. Fos: Dustn64 Either, he's that n00by, or he wants a vote to stick and lynch. I think For Dummies wanting a claim, again is a bit suspicious but not that suspicious. FOs: FD

[size=0]Btw- I think I know what he means by look at my last posts. I just couldn't find it.[/size]

[dustn64]

Vote: nagerous

[mandalorian2298]

WOAH! Long day.

now I'm not sure. Mandy seems to drop the Nagerous case out of random. It seems odd. Maybe he caught onto something. I was thinking that Mandy might be a certain role, but now I'm not as sure. Fos: MAndy Nagerous I think Nagerous's defense was fine for the amount of evidence Mandy put on the table. But I still think that he could be scum. Fos: Dustn64 Either, he's that n00by, or he wants a vote to stick and lynch. I think For Dummies wanting a claim, again is a bit suspicious but not that suspicious. FOs: FD

[size=0]Btw- I think I know what he means by look at my last posts. I just couldn't find it.[/size]

I am not suspecting nagerus any more, due to his hint-claim, wich cou ld explain my results.

Dustn, care to explain why you have re-voted nagerus (excepting the lame attempt to save your ass, after 1 vote )

[Fircoal]

WOAH! Long day.

now I'm not sure. Mandy seems to drop the Nagerous case out of random. It seems odd. Maybe he caught onto something. I was thinking that Mandy might be a certain role, but now I'm not as sure. Fos: MAndy Nagerous I think Nagerous's defense was fine for the amount of evidence Mandy put on the table. But I still think that he could be scum. Fos: Dustn64 Either, he's that n00by, or he wants a vote to stick and lynch. I think For Dummies wanting a claim, again is a bit suspicious but not that suspicious. FOs: FD

[size=0]Btw- I think I know what he means by look at my last posts. I just couldn't find it.[/size]

I am not suspecting nagerus any more, due to his hint-claim, wich cou ld explain my results.

Dustn, care to explain why you have re-voted nagerus (excepting the lame attempt to save your ass, after 1 vote )

Hmm, well until I can find the hint, I'm don't think you're cleared.

[mandalorian2298]

WOAH! Long day.

now I'm not sure. Mandy seems to drop the Nagerous case out of random. It seems odd. Maybe he caught onto something. I was thinking that Mandy might be a certain role, but now I'm not as sure. Fos: MAndy Nagerous I think Nagerous's defense was fine for the amount of evidence Mandy put on the table. But I still think that he could be scum. Fos: Dustn64 Either, he's that n00by, or he wants a vote to stick and lynch. I think For Dummies wanting a claim, again is a bit suspicious but not that suspicious. FOs: FD

[size=0]Btw- I think I know what he means by look at my last posts. I just couldn't find it.[/size]

I am not suspecting nagerus any more, due to his hint-claim, wich cou ld explain my results.

Dustn, care to explain why you have re-voted nagerus (excepting the lame attempt to save your ass, after 1 vote )

Hmm, well until I can find the hint, I'm don't think you're cleared.

Of course. The only way to be cleared by the "lynch me if he turns out pro-town" manouver is to lynch a scum (and even then, Town must be consider the posibility that mafia is sacrificing one of their own to gain credibility. I don't belive that anyone should be compleatly cleared untill the game ends. )

[Fircoal]

WOAH! Long day.

now I'm not sure. Mandy seems to drop the Nagerous case out of random. It seems odd. Maybe he caught onto something. I was thinking that Mandy might be a certain role, but now I'm not as sure. Fos: MAndy Nagerous I think Nagerous's defense was fine for the amount of evidence Mandy put on the table. But I still think that he could be scum. Fos: Dustn64 Either, he's that n00by, or he wants a vote to stick and lynch. I think For Dummies wanting a claim, again is a bit suspicious but not that suspicious. FOs: FD

[size=0]Btw- I think I know what he means by look at my last posts. I just couldn't find it.[/size]

I am not suspecting nagerus any more, due to his hint-claim, wich cou ld explain my results.

Dustn, care to explain why you have re-voted nagerus (excepting the lame attempt to save your ass, after 1 vote )

Hmm, well until I can find the hint, I'm don't think you're cleared.

Of course. The only way to be cleared by the "lynch me if he turns out pro-town" manouver is to lynch a scum (and even then, Town must be consider the posibility that mafia is sacrificing one of their own to gain credibility. I don't belive that anyone should be compleatly cleared untill the game ends. )

ok, cleated from teh top of my suspision list more like.

[XenCobra]

The reason, I didn't belive his claim is that I would of thought Albus would have more a power role, rather than a simple Cop.

I was trying to belive him by asking questions but Talapus dropped the hammer before he could answer my last question.

PLS, pls give me one day
ill show you what i am on day 2

How can you show yourself on day 2? If you don't get lynch, you more or likely will get night killed by claiming Albus Dumbledore.

Depending on his answer I would of unvote him, but he never got the chance to answer. Was to busy waiting for an answer, to unvote.

And he looked very scummy with all the CAPS and what not.

Vote: nagerous

Care to start putting reasons on to your votes/foses?

Vote: Dustn64 all of your unvotes and votes look scummy or noobish.

[wiggybowler]

I do think that dustin is acting the scummiest, throwing votes around. I say we should lynch him then see who he hasn't thrown votes at they might be scum if he is.

[Skoffin]

Does anyone else get this horrible feeling that all the townies have some kind of funky role? I have the suspiscion that none of us are just regular townies. And I think there was more then one cop.
We should lynch Freezie for all this confusion.

Buut since we can't, I think Nag and Many are both town but getting confusing results(unless that was one hell of a way to throw suspision off each other), but Dustn throwing in voted left and right at whatever is popular at the time is either very scummy or very noobish, and in no way helping the town. Potentially even harmful to the town.

vote Dustn

[dustn64]

ok guys, I am going to be honest. It is completly noobish.

[danodukebb]

Vote for dummies

doesnt seem right with me...

[pancakemix]

Last edited by dustn64 on Jun 06 2007 22:29; edited 1 time in total

You bet it is.

Dustn, I'm only going to tell you this once. It is against the rules to edit a post. No matter what your reason is. Be it spelling, a mistake, wrong name, putting that error back to try and fix the problem, don't do it.

[freezie]

Geez Thanks guys, look at all the work I have to do...*sigh*

And yes Skoffin, you could lynch me if you want. It'll force a no lynch and I will stop making vote counts, just death scenes..but you can

[Skoffin]

It'd be worth it...

[freezie]

VOTE COUNT

Nagerous (5) - Alexwales93,firth4eva,Pancakemix, for dummies, Dustn.
Dustn (3)-Xencobra, skoffin, Wiggybowler.
Xencobra (2) -Kernal Kronic, Talapus.
For dummies (2) - Gimpythewonder, Danodukebb

Mandy (1) - Nagerous

18 Alive, 10 to lynch. Deadline in 2 days exactly.

[wiggybowler]

I do think that dustin is acting the scummiest, throwing votes around. I say we should lynch him then see who he hasn't thrown votes at they might be scum if he is.

sorry I meant to add vote--dustn

[freezie]

I do think that dustin is acting the scummiest, throwing votes around. I say we should lynch him then see who he hasn't thrown votes at they might be scum if he is.

sorry I meant to add vote--dustn

Right after my vote count..

[Skoffin]

OI Freezie, what have you been told about editing?

*ducks and covers*

[freezie]

I was told I am the mod. Actually, I am a self-proclaimed mod.

[Fircoal]

Geez Thanks guys, look at all the work I have to do...*sigh*

And yes Skoffin, you could lynch me if you want. It'll force a no lynch and I will stop making vote counts, just death scenes..but you can

We rule for lynching the mod is better. SAy hello to modkills.