Random thought:
Where the hell is Tim? He seems to be posting in the other game but hasn't posted since night 1 here.
FOS Tim, not only for the inactivity mind you.
I kinda prefer the Aage vote because of where the votes come from and at this point I highly doubt neither of these two are scum, but I'm starting to wonder if they couldn't both be scum actually
On Aage:
Skoffin wrote:* If the argument on Aage hinges on him not having thought Benga scummy enough to vote him then, again, I am scummy for the exact same reasons as I also did not vote for Benga. As I am not scum I certainly cannot punish someone for doing the same thing I did.
If we are going to mention a particular point as to why someone is scum then I think it's prudent to highlight why other people are not scummy for having done the same thing.
and yeah, I don't see any reasons for why a scum aage would go to kill Wing - it seems an unnecessary way to draw attention to himself today. Sure, Aage *could* be scum but I don't think the reasons presented thus far make a good case for it. I think the case on Hotshot is better than the one on Aage.
The most scummy thing is that Aage tells us his reasoning now, way after the fact, in day 2. You expressed your reasoning in the middle of it all, several times. That means his reasoning for not voting Benga has wayyyy less value to me. If he was of that opinion all along, why not state it instead of making a frivolous post joking at Wing? That's not a "I don't think the case is good" approach, that's a "wait and maybe my scumbuddy won't get lynched and if he does I won't be called out" approach.
The fact you think he made the same conscious decision as you and you're town so he must be town is very WIFOMy and nonsensical, especially when you were wrong. So there
The other main thing that bugs me is this:
aage wrote:nagerous wrote:I am mostly in agreement in regards to the arguments laid on against hotshot too, my gut it just telling me that if he (or rodion) had been partners with benga, they would have just gone ahead and thrown him under the bus - and not played the way they did, it would have been a very high risk strategy as they would know they would be under pressure the next game day - unless it is a double bluff..
This I agree with. Considering the lynch countdown mechanic MM introduced, it would've been the act of a naive optimist to believe Benga would survive the wagon. Hotshot is not that. I'd be more interested to hear from DJFireside, honestly. Subbed in with the vaguest of posts, then proceeded to hammer Benga at the last possible moment with what was basically a bandwagon vote. What's more, Benga would've been lynched regardless of DJ's vote. I'd rather look for scum among the latecomers to the Benga wagon than the abstainers.
Followed by this:
aage wrote:Hotshot isn't being lynched, dummy. I am.
Vote Hotshot out of self-preservation.
Now I know there's not so much time left but voting for Hotshot when you don't think he's scum doesn't look good. Especially when you seem to have other suspicions. You say self-preservation, I say desperation.
On Hotshot:
HotShot53 wrote:I know my defending him looks bad after his flip... but anyone who has played scum when I am scum also knows I'm more likely to throw a fellow scum under the bus than defend them, especially on day 1 when it's pretty obvious that's where the lynch is going.
Skittles! wrote:I don't think he is scummy for defending benga, I think hotshot is scummy because he is playing a similar style of game to Indigo League - noncommittal, sparse posting, not overly bothered by what is happening in the discussion. While Skoffin and Fircoal don't think his meta could be applied to this game, I'm keeping my votes on him until I see an overall improvement in his posts and if another lead takes us somewhere.
nagerous wrote:I am mostly in agreement in regards to the arguments laid on against hotshot too, my gut it just telling me that if he (or rodion) had been partners with benga, they would have just gone ahead and thrown him under the bus - and not played the way they did, it would have been a very high risk strategy as they would know they would be under pressure the next game day - unless it is a double bluff.
The problem I have with all these arguments for or against is that they're just pure metagame. Having (I think) never played with Hotshot, and not read to that extent Indigo (nor willing to), it doesn't hold much water IMO.
Here's the full discussion that Strike pulled from:
HotShot53 wrote:nagerous wrote:HotShot53 wrote:Fircoal wrote:HotShot53 wrote:madmitch wrote:VOTE BENGA His statement to to Nag about being a docter shows he has not the same goals as we (town) do.
I'm not sure what his comment asking why Nag (he thought) claimed doc has anything to do with his goals? Skimming yeah, since Nag corrected it in the next post.
Because claiming as a doc seems like a weird claim to make, doesn't it?
Well, yeah, I assumed benga thought it weird too, because he asked if nag was actually making a doc claim,
and if so, why. Seems a reasonable question if you think someone might have claimed doc on day 1. Why benga didn't see the corrected next post though, I have no idea.
Yes but within this set up a doctor claim at day 1 would make even less sense
I know what you're saying, I guess I just thought Benga also thought it didn't make any sense, thus resulting in the question. Obviously most think Benga instead just has no idea about the game setup, meaning he is likely scum, which combined with his other statements is possible. It's as good as any other day 1 case so far anyway
I gotta admit at first this didn't really feel compelling but the more I read it the more I see how this could be a real slip up quickly fixed. The part in red bugs me the most.
In summary, I ran out of time and I think we should lynch both of them.