Skoffin wrote:
Thez - When the Nark lynch was taking place one of his posts seemed to imply he believed Nark's roleblocker claim... if you believe someone to likely be telling the truth, why would you support their lynch anyway?
If me saying "I have no trouble with lynching AD even though he claimed a townie roleblocker role as he has been acting weird." came off as me trusting him then I'm sorry, I never believed ADs claim (changing claims as he did never makes for credibility).
Skoffin wrote:
It's a common new player tactic not to have a opinion heavily swaying one way, and he seems to have done that on all the lynches.
Can't see where I have been in any way against neither the AD not the sam lynch tbh, I did however slow it down a bit to give people some time to reflect. Can't see why you should hold that against me though seeing as you where the one complaining about speed lynches.

Skoffin wrote:
MM, for obvious reasons. Trouble is he always comes off this scummy
Like Nark, he also implied he had some sort of investigating power role and got Selin lynched. Except he never claimed, and now ace claims cop. So wtf is he?
I kind of agree here. His part in Selin's lynch and overall behavior doesn't sit that well with me. The only thing that makes me doubt his scumminess is the fact that he is one of the 3 original insomniacs and as the other 2 was a scum godfather and a SK I would have expected the last one to be town to not put us at to big a disadvantage, could he be cult??? Was there time for a cult recruiting on the first day/night?
Also from MMs posts after his investigative "claim" I'd say that if he's scum it is very likely that Fircoal is too as he claimed him as a confirmed townie. And yes Fircoal is a big ass lurker.
