Moderator: Community Team
pancakemix wrote:@Storr's response to my post: This is why I hate in-post responses to some extent, because they're really hard to respond to themselves. In broad points, I think our lines on what defines "mechanical" are in different places, as are our interpretations of the extent to which mechanical discussion can be indicative. That itself could become considered mechanical discussion, so I'm not gonna delve too deep there lest I risk of being accused of starting another.
its probably true. I think the reads by themselves that you develped off what i call mechanics, can be ok, when died with something else. but that alone i can't relate to.ok, so then it's filler in your post. Not to mention I'm sure no one thought it was a joke.
Sorry, I'll include these guys more in the future.![]()
![]()
you probably should. it looked like an incredibly late comment, to a subject that had resolved itself, + add in following posts that seemed to repeat the same behavior made it look worse.
You responses to my reads are basically that there are two sides to each coin. And that's true. But saying that interpretation could go one way or the other doesn't really generate anything.
ok? you recall when people pushed against my reads? i kept fighting, kept trying to make people see the way i saw things. Or maybe my read was misguided, so now i've cleared up a wrong impulse who knows. Seems more like an reason to not continue your pressure.
Moving on from there:Zivel wrote:You bring up the joke vote a lot, that happened a long time ago in the day. Basing you reads of that far ago goes against what you state as reading the game as you go along as you seem to be still using information from early in the day to relate to what is happening now.
The joke was directly addressed by Storr, so it warranted response. Outside of that, it is much involved in the reads on certain players, such as Anam, whose first post had a great deal to do with that. My point really is that it's moot and we shouldn't keep talking about it or reading into it. As for using early day info (and in Anam's case that's basically all there is), you wanted reads on particular people and that requires research/citations to double check that I'm refering to the correct person. Plus, the idea is we get the whole field of info about everyone and have that for reference. Isn't that why the "no-edit" rule is in place?
On Ultra's claim: I'll agree with aage that there is a tendency for opposite alignment lovers to be a thing, but that also proves to be untrue as often as it is actually true. Which kinda blows. 1:1 town to mafia is typically a good trade for town, but the question is is that worth the gamble? For ultra's part, I doubt he'd be the scum side of such an arrangement. That said, it's also the type of claim that would spook anyone who might dare challenge it. Oh, but that's a whole other dance...
Is it a thing? who else has done it besides my got game? and why are you talking about opposite alignments. Fairly certain all lover pairs claimed to know for certain they are all the same alignment.Zivel wrote:Hmmm I am a lover, and my partner and I are confirmed town. And no, you are not my partner....
Scum slip? Tell me why the hell would you pick lovers to fake claim in a group this large of non vanilla? Did you really think there would not be a pair of lovers to counter claim you?
Oh, now THAT is interesting...
This is the big thing, that makes me feel you are really behind in this game. tons of discussion has been had about lovers, and it seems you are just looking into it, with out reading the developmentsStreaker wrote:@PCM, I can understand you feeling i'm too agressive on Ultra, but don't accuse me of going for an 'easy' case. It's anything but easy as nobody is giving a crap to lynch him, while i'm trying to persuade everyone to lynch him.
With the situation as it is, I don't feel we can let go of Ultra's claim (and the counterclaim that followed). Would there be 2 pairs of lovers in this game? Unlikely, not impossible. Mafia would never counterclaim here (I think).
"Easy" is relative, to be sure. My concern is less about the difficulty and more about pounding the hammer.
As for your second question, no. Two sets of lovers is bastard modding unless BOTH of the lovers have a scum pairing, which is bastard modding the other way.
again its even more clear this post is being written as you read the game, you haven't caught up to the discussion, and i really don't think you are adding anything productive with this, it just looks like a big fluffy postDD wrote:Also, if you believe it's unlikely that there are two pairs of lovers, it's more unlikely that there are 3... And no neither Ultra or Ziv is my lover. Ultra seems very scummy for claiming that he is a lover first. Ziv gets townie points for coming forward to counterclaim.
...
'Kay, I need to Unvote and take a step back here for a minute...
yeah
So, some analysis for a moment. There are 6 lovers now in the mix:
1. Ultra/Virus
2. Zivel/???
3. DD/???
Of those six, the likelihood that at least one of them is mafia is very high just based on numbers alone (think: if we had 6 people whose deaths were tied together and they were all town, we'd be boned from the get-go). I think it behooves us then to roll the dice lynch at least one set of lovers today because we probably have like a 1/3 chance of finding a scum in the process, which is decent odds. The downside here is guessing wrong, in which case it's at worst a 6:1 trade. That's reeeally bad. Also, we're basically going to have 4 deaths by tomorrow if we do that, but at this point we're probably going to have 3 deaths minimum anyway.
yet we are not even certain lovers die as pairs, since none of them are sure if they both die if one dies...strike wolf wrote:So virus doesnt believe he dies with his lover. DD seems confident he does. Virus says hes been talking to his lover today, DD says they can only communicate at night. DD says he has another ability. Virus dodged the question. Did I miss anything?
Don't think so. It's awful fishy.UltrasPlot wrote:Unvote dd
Lynch Ultra
Best course of action.
Of course, this is assuming we have a bg to keep me alive til tomorrow.
nopenopenope
I think you're the scum and you're totes bussing your townie lover. Which becomes a strange conundrum. Actually, his entire power makes no sense. Are you lovers or not? Because him saving you would make you die anyway, the way you tell it.
can you explain pcm how they could be different alignments, when they are certain they are the same alignment?
God, this is totally baffling. Some consistency at the very least would be nice...Zivel wrote:Want to hear more from others. PCM what is your read on all this?
Oh, how I love being picked on.![]()
![]()
This isn't picking on, and this shouldn't be a surprise. YOu had been under pressure from him, you made a good post, relieving pressure, and so further involvment of you shouldn't be a surprise.mtamburini wrote:Ultra wants to self sacrifice himself to prove himself, thats retarded if hes mafia or 3rd party.
The first CC might be the most scummy of the 3 if there is any,
DD counter counter claiming is the most towny.
Either that or he's crazy like a fox. It's very possible he's taking a huge gamble here/doesn't care about virus.UltrasPlot wrote:Virus can only take the bullet himself the first time I die. Essentially he can only revive me.
So if you have no value, what use is it to keep you around? Or rather, why should we sacrifice another townie if you are our only reward for it? Also, how do you feel about the fact that the more you throw your partner under the bus, the more you paint a target on his back should he live through the night? I'm pretty certain there's more to this than you're actually telling us.
2. @dd- Did you get this same mod confirmation for you and your partner being both town aligned?
No. I also did not ask, however I'm town and I read my partner as town as well
I've received confirmation that lovers are the same alignment
aage wrote:virus90 wrote:since i dont want to givve any reason for a modkill im gonna summarize only the important stuff
so my full claim:
name: Yuuki Asuna,
ability: shield lover
explanation ability: if ultra dies i get a pm and i can choose to revive him at cost of my own live. (this is for both day and night kills)
Okay, but why would you do that? Ultra has no further use since he has no power role and you are just as much confirmed townie as he would be. Stuff like empathy aside, why would you get yourself killed if it doesnt help you or your game goals? You know you are a townie! Do you have a death wish?
I fear what pcm said... either Ultra is throwing you under the bus, or you're just both lying.
The fact that he other two lovers have inconsistent stories does not help. Rish mak
ing a point of being vague also points to foul play, though I'd rather not use that argument.
StorrZerg wrote:@zivel, now i'd love to know who your partner is. since i do think you are town, how ever i understand why its probably for the best to not announce that yet.
dd515087 wrote:Whatsausage wrote:So this is back a couple pages, but here I am with comments/concerns DD.
Previously you read anark, myself, and aage as scum with no reasons provided. And now in this post, anark has become primarily neutral, aage has become town, and I have stayed the same while you have added AOG, ultra, and virus to the scum list.
So what are reasons for the original scum reads, the changes, and the current scum reads. (You can also give reasons for your town reads)
The original reads were my thoughts on like half the game at the moment. I felt like I needed to post something after I was prodded, after reading through the rest of the posts I changed my mind.
As for Ultra and virus... Did you skim through everything? They have been read as scum for numerous reasons: poor reads, weird votes, calling each other scum and then coming out as lovers... Do I need to say more? I will go back and quote everything if necessary, but if you read through the last 4ish pages you will find everything on them.
UltrasPlot wrote:
Also remember that I get lynched (and js we lose another if I get lynched... one with an important role...) if I have the most votes by deadline, since plurality seems to apply.
virus90 wrote:since i dont want to givve any reason for a modkill im gonna summarize only the important stuff
so my full claim:
name: Yuuki Asuna,
ability: shield lover
explanation ability: if ultra dies i get a pm and i can choose to revive him at cost of my own live. (this is for both day and night kills)
StorrZerg wrote:DD seems to have the most inconsistency out of the lovers. as for what they have claimed and what he has. Out side of his lover claim.2. @dd- Did you get this same mod confirmation for you and your partner being both town aligned?
No. I also did not ask, however I'm town and I read my partner as town as well
well now..I've received confirmation that lovers are the same alignment
I didn't have the confirmation that Ziv and Ultra claimed to have so I asked the mod myself and was told lovers are the same alignment
Ok, with that all lovers have claimed same alignment, thus any speculation about 1 mafia 1 lover, seems grossly misguided and a waste of time to discuss.
AoG could be scum. havn't really looked at him all game that much. Also i don't understand his logic that we have a 50% of lynching scum, by lynching either zivel or dd.. Part of his logic is assuming a scum could be in the lover pair , when (zivel has claimed both are confirmed town to each other) and im pretty sure dd did as well.
this is correct
...
Lover talk. If i had to peg a group to being mafia right now. It would be dd + who ever. (no day talk is strange since the other 2 have it) I'd def put zivel as town with who ever he has.
In my role pm it explains that I have to visit my lover in secret (at night) because of some bad history between our families. So it makes sense that we don't have day talk
And i'd put ultra/virus as 3rd party. (maybe zivel group is switched with ultra) But I'd be fairly certain that ultra is hiding something about his power if virus is lynched.
Whatsausage wrote:The only thing that is adding up with what we know in my mind is that ultra is scum, virus would flip town, but his WC is for ultra to live to the end or for ultra to win. Having the "same" win condition would make them the same "alignment" even if one shows scum and one shows town right? I think that is why ultra and virus are so willing to have virus take the lynch in ultra's place, so willing to the point of ultra voting himself. This would be a way for ultra to be "confirmed" town, when he may very well not be.
StorrZerg wrote:i like the point you bring up about virus/ultra situation. similar to my view, i can't see why we would lynch ultra and let virus die if we have any doubt about them it should indicate we have to lynch virus first.
virus90 wrote:well as i pointed out in my previous post i got the feeling that me dying might somehow be a part of it, dont know if it unlocks something or it is the only way out of 2 lovers dying together. So maybe indeed when i die ultra dies 2, i dont know. fact is if ultra is lynched i can decide to save him.
its also what i offered cause i was very frustrated yesterday (that should be quite obvious from the posts yesterday), so for me. as a towny believing my partner is also town, its towny to do that (for the reasons just stated).
if we all agree and most importantly ultra agrees that we decide to let him die and not for me to catch a bullet im fine 2. it indeed doesnt matter if you have the one useless town or the other... but since i said i would, and i think it might be beneficial somehow for me to die instead of him, since i kind of see it as my purpose, i prefer to jump the bullet if ultra gets lynched or NK'ed
dd515087 wrote:Ultra and Virus seem the least possible for scum? Really?![]()
I've had confirmation from the mod that lovers are the same alignment (He could have been referring to my lover pair specifically, but they way it was worded makes me believe that it refers to all). Why would I falsely claim something that the mod has told me? Anyone could easily ask the mod the same question and receive the answer themselves...
You are now a very scummy read on my list
virus90 wrote:yes i could just let him die, but i said i would take the fall for him. Maybe in some twisted universe like this it unlocks something we dont know or anything, my only ability in this game is to die for him, so im ok with that being "my purpose" in this game. and maybe after all lovers generally die together, we dont know that, maybe thats a way to get out of that.
i dont know what other purpose i have besides dying for him.
virus wrote:WOWWWWWW when i think about it 3 pairs of lovers CAN be explained. I am gonna call it: RECRUITER/CULT
it would explain why we are all the same allignement and why the mod confirmed that, that even makes it possible for all 3 lovers pairs are town.
its a genius cruel twist, at the start all lovers are town and a recruiter can change that.
to me this would make sense, its just speculation but it would be so perfectly cruel <3 i would see rishead doing something like that.
Storr wrote:why does it always feel that you are so behind in the game....
Storr wrote:you probably should. it looked like an incredibly late comment, to a subject that had resolved itself, + add in following posts that seemed to repeat the same behavior made it look worse.
Overall this post is very weird from pcm. Sure it shows him posting while reading the game, and updating his thoughts. but nothing is new from this post. its almost like giant filler. He has missed key points about the lvoers claiming to be same aligned, and many of the questions he has has all ready been asked. I see no conclusion from the situation as well, or what direction he wants to go about this. (considering he unvoted )
I also asked pcm to make a case/push someone else. i didn't care if he kept his vote on ultra or not. He didn't follow through. Sure he didn't say he would, but if we look at how he stands in the game, we don't know where he stands. If we don't lynch a lover, who would we lynch? For all the ground he gained in the post that satisfied myself, he just back peddled a great deal with this post...
Storr wrote:@zivel, now i'd love to know who your partner is. since i do think you are town, how ever i understand why its probably for the best to not announce that yet.
virus90 wrote:just imagine for a moment, before i posted my first things, ultra was already the center of attention.
knowing what my ability was, before my game even began i was already kind of doomed to die.
for the 2nd game in a row not making it to day 2, might just not be the best experience you can have.
there for my cynical approach and my indifference who dies.
i still hope somewhere we come to senses and decide otherwise but i feel dead before the game even began for me. maybe if you view it from my point of view you get where my actions and decisions come from.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
Whatsausage wrote:dd515087 wrote:Whatsausage wrote:So this is back a couple pages, but here I am with comments/concerns DD.
Previously you read anark, myself, and aage as scum with no reasons provided. And now in this post, anark has become primarily neutral, aage has become town, and I have stayed the same while you have added AOG, ultra, and virus to the scum list.
So what are reasons for the original scum reads, the changes, and the current scum reads. (You can also give reasons for your town reads)
The original reads were my thoughts on like half the game at the moment. I felt like I needed to post something after I was prodded, after reading through the rest of the posts I changed my mind.
As for Ultra and virus... Did you skim through everything? They have been read as scum for numerous reasons: poor reads, weird votes, calling each other scum and then coming out as lovers... Do I need to say more? I will go back and quote everything if necessary, but if you read through the last 4ish pages you will find everything on them.
Alright I was really looking for what changed your mind, and actually I thought about putting "these may be a bit more obvious" behind ultra and virus, but now you have at least clarified that they are your thoughts. So no, you don't need to say any more on them, but perhaps you could share why you lessened on anark and made aage town?
Army of GOD wrote:also I think we're leaning right now that lovers, going against the classic lover model, DO NOT die together. I just trust ultra/virus more because they were both willing to claim lovers together (Which means that if one of them are scum, they're both scum) instead of us just lynching ultra and not knowing who his other half was. Here are our possibilities in terms of lynching the lovers right now:
I'm pretty sure I mentioned this earlier, but based on my Role PM and the commonly known story that my character is based off, I think that if I die then my lover will die too
...
the point I'm poorly making is that if ultra and virus were both scum, it would be a horrifically bad play to come out as lovers. I just feel as if zivel and dd are protecting their lovers' identities because they know that lovers are same alignment and they don't want to screw their other half over.
If I revealed who my lover was mafia would be able to target either one of us in the night, whereas now they can only target me
also the fact that ultra/virus got counter claimed means nothing to me. zivel and dd could've just done it thinking "oh, I am scum but I am a lover pair also, maybe I can convince the town I am non-scum by counter claiming".
I don't think that there would be any logic in a scum counter claim. That is too bold a move IMO. Maybe a third party, but I think Zivel is town and my guess for who is partner is is also very townie (granted I could be wrong about his lover, but it's something)
[/quote]dd515087 wrote:also the fact that ultra/virus got counter claimed means nothing to me. zivel and dd could've just done it thinking "oh, I am scum but I am a lover pair also, maybe I can convince the town I am non-scum by counter claiming".
I don't think that there would be any logic in a scum counter claim. That is too bold a move IMO. Maybe a third party, but I think Zivel is town and my guess for who is partner is is also very townie (granted I could be wrong about his lover, but it's something)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users