
Moderator: Community Team
Mr. Squirrel wrote:cena-rules wrote:Mr. Squirrel wrote:cena-rules wrote:not much use doing anything until there is more active people
Thats bull cena. This comment alone has made me suspicious of you. It doesnt matter how many players there are in a game, discussion is always necessary. Explain yourself
By doing anything, I mean voting or serious large decisions.
Why not have serious discussions? Even if we dont have everyone participating, there is still a high chance that at least one of us is scum. This game should continue just like a smaller game would. If all scum were deadbeating, i would assume the mod would be a lot more adamant in making sure there are replacements. After all, having a bunch of townies lynching each other ruins the point of the game. unvote vote cena. Trying to stem discussion is always scummy, no exception.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
MeDeFe wrote:Mr. Squirrel wrote:cena-rules wrote:Mr. Squirrel wrote:cena-rules wrote:not much use doing anything until there is more active people
Thats bull cena. This comment alone has made me suspicious of you. It doesnt matter how many players there are in a game, discussion is always necessary. Explain yourself
By doing anything, I mean voting or serious large decisions.
Why not have serious discussions? Even if we dont have everyone participating, there is still a high chance that at least one of us is scum. This game should continue just like a smaller game would. If all scum were deadbeating, i would assume the mod would be a lot more adamant in making sure there are replacements. After all, having a bunch of townies lynching each other ruins the point of the game. unvote vote cena. Trying to stem discussion is always scummy, no exception.
On the other hand, wercool hasn't made an impression of being the world's best organized GM, so though your deductions are logical, the empirical data is a bit shaky.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
wercool wrote::-$ im soppused to do that. and i think ive figured out the voaden double role problem.
wercool wrote:cena-rules 2 spiesr naxus
vodean 1 edocsil
gregwolf 1 safariguy
edocsil 2 gregwolf mr squirrel
naxus 1 cena-rules
17 alive 9 to lynch
pmchugh wrote:If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
lalaland wrote:This is what I love about Spamalot... you click on a title to a thread, and you have no idea what you'll find inside...
That sounds a lot like inactivity...duday53 wrote:Just thought I would post and let you guys know I'm not inactive. I only come on Conquer Club for the mafia.. I don't play any games. So I often forget I'm in this game. Especially because the last time I checked this people were still confirming.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
edocsil wrote:this is impossible to do anything day1 with so few people. Do we just want to do a quick no lynch? Progress the game?
pmchugh wrote:If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
Mr. Squirrel wrote:edocsil wrote:this is impossible to do anything day1 with so few people. Do we just want to do a quick no lynch? Progress the game?
no
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
I believe the no wasMeDeFe wrote:neither?Mr. Squirrel wrote:noedocsil wrote:this is impossible to do anything day1 with so few people. Do we just want to do a quick no lynch? Progress the game?
spiesr wrote:I believe the no wasMeDeFe wrote:neither?Mr. Squirrel wrote:noedocsil wrote:this is impossible to do anything day1 with so few people. Do we just want to do a quick no lynch? Progress the game?
to using a no lynch to progress the game...
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
spiesr wrote:So mystery man has voted for me, what could this be? I mean it looks like a politician, but don't need to steal someone's vote at night first? Maybe just a freaking secret voter.That sounds a lot like inactivity...duday53 wrote:Just thought I would post and let you guys know I'm not inactive. I only come on Conquer Club for the mafia.. I don't play any games. So I often forget I'm in this game. Especially because the last time I checked this people were still confirming.
lalaland wrote:This is what I love about Spamalot... you click on a title to a thread, and you have no idea what you'll find inside...
gregwolf121 wrote:so any ideas or leads or are we all just supposed to be giving each other the silent treatment
Mr. Squirrel wrote:cena-rules wrote:By doing anything, I mean voting or serious large decisions.
Why not have serious discussions? ... Trying to stem discussion is always scummy, no exception.
wercool wrote:okay vodean problem has been taken care of and vodean's second role (3rd party surviver) has been killed.
MeDeFe wrote:spiesr wrote:I believe the no wasMeDeFe wrote:neither?Mr. Squirrel wrote:noedocsil wrote:this is impossible to do anything day1 with so few people. Do we just want to do a quick no lynch? Progress the game?
to using a no lynch to progress the game...
How would a quick no lynch progress the game?
Thezzaruz wrote:He said decisions not discussions, quite a big difference I'd say.
Skimming is better than random so UnVote and Vote Mr. Squirrel.
pmchugh wrote:If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
It would cause the game to move to night and then day 2. The game would progress from day 1 to day 2. I am not advocating this, however as it does little good.MeDeFe wrote:How would a quick no lynch progress the game?
Mr. Squirrel wrote:Thezzaruz wrote:He said decisions not discussions, quite a big difference I'd say.
Skimming is better than random so UnVote and Vote Mr. Squirrel.
Sorry, but my opinion still stands. Just because not everyone is here doesnt mean we cant lynch someone or decide anything. If later on someone becomes active and changes our decision, thats fine. Mafia is a dynamic game with politics constantly changing. I just dont want this game to go dead on day 1. I hate it when that happens
Users browsing this forum: No registered users