/ wrote:crazymilkshake5 wrote:new guy1 wrote:crazymilkshake5 wrote:mk, I agree mostly with jak, but he does seem like our best choice for a lynch atm. but im not voting him.
fastposted
You see, I have a problem with this. You say hes the best choice for a lynch but you dont vote him? Why are you refraining if you believe him to be the best candidate? And I am NOT egging you on, Im just wondering why you are so undecisive if you believe him to be the scummiest person. I do not have a candidate and that is why I refrain from casting an uneducated vote. You however believe him the best candidate and list no reason why you are not going to vote him? Explain please.
fastposted- also just thought, I do not want to derail the case on Jak if it is that far along, but I just find a problem in this.
I'm just willing to let things pan out, thats all, if it will appease you i will vote for him.
He doesn't care at all where his vote goes, instead passing the responsibility onto whomever.
First off. Learn sarcasm.
secondly, I was going to drop the hammer on jak, but he had already died. And dont tell me he wasnt fucking dead.