Day 1 votecount wrote:13 Ditocoaf ====== (Flores, Futurerichguy, danodukebb, Ga7, Droz, , Icedagger, Kwan, exile, Innervision, TWO, Militant, animorph, Sam)
3 The1exile ====== (Nark, Kalish, Dito)
I would like to hear from
TWO,
animorph and
danodukebb why they switched from Ditocoaf to The1exile. Animorph and dano only gave a "What he said" comment instead of bringing their only argumentation. That strikes me as odd, as one day earlier you were still believing exile's claim over Dito's. What changed your minds? Do you still think Dito is scummy too, or does one being scum clear the other? More input on this please.
TWO did bring up an argument, but I disagree with it.
The Weird One wrote:/ wrote:Can our claimed "historians" use their roles every once in awhile so we can actually pretend to believe at least one is telling the truth *cough*votes*cough*?
Also, do safe claims usually come with complete roles, I thought it's usually just names?
He could have put one and one together after dito claimed. if exile was told that he could claim historian, or was given the name of a historian for it, he could've easily jumped in to say "me too!" when dito was giving out his role because it seemed to be a solid and safe role.
Why would exile claim dito's role? It's a rare, made-up role, so the chances of there being two of those roles in the game are practically none-existent. The only way I could see that happening is if those roles are of different alignment. This is not exile's first game; he must have realized this too. You can't possibly argue it "seemed to be a solid and safe role" for him to claim.
I think exile would only counter-claim a role like that if he had nothing to hide and is speaking the truth. Hence, Dito is likely lying.