Commander9 wrote:Well, he DID have a crime syndicate and he definitely wasn't a good guy. I can see him being neutral, but don't see problems with him being evil either.
What is a crime syndicate? I feel like I have missed something here.
Commander9 wrote:The thing is that we know this kill wasn't his, but that does not mean he doesn't have one. Also, if you would take a notice, my vote is not on him, so that should suggest a thing or two, but that doesn't mean I can't make inquiries on what's happening.
This kill thing is pure speculation. I think our time would better be spent trying to figure out who was the one who actually made the kill last night, rather than the one who supposedly maybe, could've/would've/should've had a kill, but maybe/possibly didn't want to use it.
Why are you more concerned with someone who didn't make a kill last night, then the one who actually did?
Commander, I feel as though you are trying to beat a dead wagon/horse by pressuring edoc.
Of course your vote isn't on him, as you know he isn't scum, but you sure are working hard to apply a lot of pressure to him.
I think it would be more useful for you to address some of the issues that sax raised against you, as I feel sax made a very good case. Maybe one of the best posts I've every seen from saxi
Saxi does seem to know the movie quite well, and provided an insightful analysis on Day 1. If there is anyone who is organized this game, its definitely him.