Moderator: Community Team
nagerous wrote:Calling people abusive bastards isn't really going to help you with your defence sir.
nagerous wrote:Calling people abusive bastards isn't really going to help you with your defence sir.
wicked wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:
FOS:
10.pmchugh*
23.icedagger*
25.ditocoaf
29.suika
Who the hell are you people and how many games have you played?
they're my multis1 so back off! i need advcantage to mafa! haha
and it's purrple dinosaurs and pink eleppants suggsu!
MountainLion wrote:I tend to agree with mr. incrediball. I think our best bet is to lynch someone with a post restriction, preferrably one that doesn't seem friendly or in Suika's case, paranoid.
Vote Suika
Anarkistsdream wrote:Hmm, damn, ML, that actually is a really good point.
So far, I guess voting Neoteny was good, but he does seem harmless... for now.
we'll see what happens when the scum quit getting their meds.
Unvote
Vote: Suika
Clive wrote:10 new pages already..
Well, I also wasn't in the last game, but what Mr. I said seems to make sense.
unvote vote Suika
nagerous wrote:I disagree with this bandwagon.... Seems to me Suika is just feeling threatened from messrs incrediball, iliad and pmchugh.
They are the oppressors, I think they should be lynched over Suika... perhaps he knows something about them we don't but is too jittered and knocked out to explain it to us in proper english thanks to the pills the son of a bitches have been putting in his drinks.
icedagger wrote:Wait aren't all the patinets here insane? Isn't that kinda why they're here? I doubt they're all mafia so FOS that bandwagon
Sierra_Leon wrote:Conveniently enough, my vote was already on wicked. I'm very happy with this lynch.Ditocoaf wrote:Personally, I don't see Wicked as having anything suspicious in the least about her at this point in the game. I'd jump on this bandwagon because of the deadline, but there are still others that haven't been resolved that still have more votes on them.
Kiwiwater still seems suspicious to me--he essentially claimed cop, but decided to take / with him at the same time... having claimed cop, if the mafia doesn't kill him tonight, then we'll know he's one of them. Who claims cop when there isn't even half enough people to lynch yet?
My vote stays.
But most importantly-- we need a lynch. How much time is left?
Your defence of wicked has been noted.Talapus wrote:wicked wrote:I didn't mean in general, I meant between the twobig games that have a largenumbder of the same peoples.
34 people in this game and maybe 5 really active, 5 more semi-active, some occassional and some not even showing up or paying attention. There's a lot of absentees here.
Ya, I'm doubting we'll get a lynch today unless everyone checks in tomorrow before the deadline. Realistically, I don't see that happening.Suika wrote:Wow, there's been a lot of going round in circles, but not a helluva lot else...
Unvote
That said, wicked is voting for Lion, on the grounds he's happy to vote anyone, but at the same time not wanting to vote someone is jumped on as just as scummy, so what the hell?
Your refusal to vote for wicked has been noted.hulmey wrote:wow
You're not in this game, are you?
Ditocoaf wrote:At this point, I'd be willing to jump on any bandwagon there is, just to ensure that someone gets lynched. We need the info. Unfortunately, in the final stretch, it doesn't seem likely that enough of this large group will be able to come to a consensus.
mandalorian2298 wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:Ditocoaf wrote:At this point, I'd be willing to jump on any bandwagon there is, just to ensure that someone gets lynched. We need the info. Unfortunately, in the final stretch, it doesn't seem likely that enough of this large group will be able to come to a consensus.
You just admitted you'd jump on ANY bandwagon?!?
Sounds to me like you are not being too cautious as to who gets lynched.
I agree with you there Nark. unvote vote Ditocoaf because I believe him to be the SK.
/ wrote:Vote Ditocoaf
Since he said he'd jump any bandwagon, this will be easier if he votes for himself with all of us.
Iliad wrote:Anyway ditocloaf either is an sk or a noob scum so vote ditocloaf
KiwiTaker wrote:Looks like the inmates are going to be running the asylum if you lynch me. I fail to see why when I submarine I always get voted but when znyone else does they seem to get away with it. I posted that I didn't have anything to say at 8 am in the morning. Can't someone be tired. Anyway that tirade is over. What Ditocoaf said was either scummy or noobish. Vote Ditocoaf
sheepofdumb wrote:Yeah, Ditocoaf's made too many newbish mistakes. Enough that if we weren't going after Kiwi he'd be lynched right now.
Just so you know Dito, it's not very smart to out and out deny that your scum. That looks scummy to people and is a sure fire way to get lynched.
Also jumping on bandwagons isn't a very smart this if you can tell. Scum love to try and kill the town as fast as they can and a bandwagon just makes it easier. A good scum player keeps a low profile and only bandwagons on players that look like easy lynches.
Anarkistsdream wrote:Talapus wrote:It's obvious from the opening of the story that meds are in short supply. I think there are good staff members and bad staff members and then a bunch of crazy people. Obviously the bad staff members probably have the choice to give the wrong drugs to patients here or no drugs at all. So, they will basically use the crazy people here to make them do whatever they want. So, insane people aren't a threat yet, but probably will become one.
How is that obvious, unless you are one of those staff members?
Suika wrote:icedagger wrote: Unvote although I don't really understand what a deputy does in this game
I think I know, so I'll PM you.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Suika wrote:Actually, I've already Haiku'd today, whch counts.
Reply to one or two points in your post: The PM thing was me not realising it wasn't allowed. As for AD, I have no idea why he'd make that claim, and will expand on that in the event I need to roleclaim because I've been pushed to a choke point.
I would like to know why so many people don't believe me when I say I made a genuine mistake by not voting yesterday. I'm new, and have seen no lynch days before, with no-one getting jumped on for not voting before, so your vehemance at going after me is puzzling. Yes, I screwed up, put it down to inexperience.
I'm half-wondering if you've all forgotten I'm new to this (this is only my 3rd game, and of the other two, one died after two days, and the second I only joined as a sub), which is at the same time flattering, and a pain in the ass.
Final point: I know the name of one of the Physicians on staff. I'm hesitant to reveal the name, given the death of a Doc, but at the same time I have no clue to their alignment. I'll leave it up to my accusers to decide if I should reveal the name or not.
I'll add that in the (seemingly unlikely) event I survive to tomorrow, I will probably have a second name.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
MountainLion wrote:Well done SL. Some of it is reaching, but IMO sometimes that's the best way to find scum.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Anarkistsdream wrote:MountainLion wrote:Well done SL. Some of it is reaching, but IMO sometimes that's the best way to find scum.
But you are not sure enough to vote?
The problem at this point is that two town staff have died, which means that, more than likely, scum staff now outnumber.
Clive wrote:The problem at this point is that two town staff have died, which means that, more than likely, scum staff now outnumber.
I'd have thought the town staff outnumber scum staff in the normal kinda ratio.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
DoomYoshi wrote:Test it on me. Tree stump is my favorite role anyway lol. Next time I am picking Wispy Woods as my character.
rebelman wrote:obviously you are looking for a woman thats a good cook and likes you to dominate in one on oneJOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:thats why my next wife will be a player from this site. I wont mention who
CrabNebula wrote:Pooooooooooosting I am, hic, curses!
Nice summary Sierra, hic, thanks for making me nooooooooot reread, and with that vote Suika
Even if yoooooooou are new, hic, others have done given enough defense for you to make me vote you. Oh btw, I think it would be a gooooood idea to give the name of the person you said, hic, you knew before you are lynched. Assuming hicthat bad staff are moooooore, then it may be beneficial.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
icedagger wrote:CrabNebula wrote:Pooooooooooosting I am, hic, curses!
Nice summary Sierra, hic, thanks for making me nooooooooot reread, and with that vote Suika
Even if yoooooooou are new, hic, others have done given enough defense for you to make me vote you. Oh btw, I think it would be a gooooood idea to give the name of the person you said, hic, you knew before you are lynched. Assuming hicthat bad staff are moooooore, then it may be beneficial.
There's no reason scum staff would outnumber town staff at this stage.. giving the name would only give scum a target if suika turns out to be town
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
icedagger wrote:Only 1 more town staff than mafia staff has died.. and there can be scum patients as well as town. I don't think its very likely at all that mafia staff are close in numbers to town staff atm
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users