Moderator: Community Team
jonty125 wrote:As requested vote TFO
betiko wrote:jonty125 wrote:As requested vote TFO
thanks mate; you sure you didn't forget to say meth there though???![]()
tfo can you please vote jonty and strike can we get a VC after that?
Rugbirn wrote:IAM you weren't a watcher, you were a killer visiting Xstor and your lack of creative defense proves it. I believe CD and since his claim I will
unvote
vote iAmCaffeine
aage wrote: Maybe you're right, but since we receive no handlebars from the mod I think we should get some ourselves.
Rugbirn wrote:IAM you weren't a watcher, you were a killer visiting Xstor and your lack of creative defense proves it. I believe CD and since his claim I will
unvote
vote iAmCaffeine
Rugbirn wrote:IAM you weren't a watcher, you were a killer visiting Xstor and your lack of creative defense proves it. I believe CD and since his claim I will
unvote
vote iAmCaffeine
Rugbirn wrote:IAM,
Two points that refute your logic.
1. If I was a killer, why is XStor alive?
2. How do you explain CD's (Hank) investigation of you?
Oh, I forgot about your wild framer theory. Please tell us you don't believe CD - much more believable!
Rodion wrote:*Sighs* This keeps getting worse.
Guys, Rugbirn softclaimed a protective role. He did no such thing. Even a dim bulb like me can figure out that with two watchers and no death Rugbirn was not trying to kill. That does not however make him a protective role. He could be any number of mafia/third party roles as well. He will protect CD tonight.Doing what?
However, we can't be sure to trust CD's protection solely on Rugbirn because:
a) Rugbirn could be roleblocked (or CD could)
b) Rugbirn could be mafia
c) Rugbirn could be so clueless he isn't a protective role and didn't realize what he has done
These three statements negate your initial "Guys, Rugbirn softclaimed a protective role." So there is no confusion you make this as a statement to say " He will protect CD tonight" What is the point of saying he is a protective role as if it a certainty and then completely contradict yourself the next paragraph?
Consequently, I still recommend other protective roles to target him (CD) just to be safe. Ideally, a town busdriver, so he is both likely to live and to not be roleblocked.
[color=#FF0000]You think? Protect the claimed cop? Good ideaseriously...you have been making posts like this all game. They appear to have substance but really don't.
PCM hates it when I direct town roles, but he's dead anyway!
Rugbirn wrote:1. If I was a killer, why is XStor alive?
Rodion wrote:What?
Rugbirn said that Caffeine visited Stor to kill Stor.
he can claim that sure, the only way this makes sense is if he is working with TFO
Stor is alive.
Most likely explanation is that Stor got protected.
Most likely explanation is that 2 watchers watched me, TFO (meth ability or w/e) and IAC claim (which was said first) and 1 other person
If Caffeine tried to kill Stor, the watch report must have come from TFO (as in TFO and Caffeine are mafia AND they can daytalk, thus TFO leaked the results for Caffeine to claim watcher).
If 3 people visited Stor and the only unknown action to this point is Rugbirn's, assuming Caffeine tried to kill Stor with Stor actually alive implies Rugbirn did in fact protect him.
Tbh that is a pretty far reach. Thing is, why does IAC kill me, and his buddy TFO watch me? Why stack things?
Really, it can't get any simpler.
It's not a certainty only because I don't control his thought process and he could be saying something that makes no sense at all, thus option "c". But that doesn't seem to be the case.
Look:Rugbirn wrote:1. If I was a killer, why is XStor alive?
Caffeine can easily reply with the very same question. Rugbin could not have possibly been oblivious to that. The difference is that Caffeine can't say he protected Stor after having claimed watcher, something Rugbirn can to explain why Stor lives should Caffeine revert the question. It's all crystal clear, really.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Rodion wrote:What?
Rugbirn said that Caffeine visited Stor to kill Stor.
Stor is alive.
Most likely explanation is that Stor got protected.
strike wolf wrote:Official Vote Count
iAmCaffeine (6)-Mob Deadly, Gregwolf, Cooldeals, Iron buttefly, superkeener, Rugbirn
Rishaed (1)-Virus90
Gregwolf121 (1)-X-Stor-x,
Cooldeals
Superkeener
Theforgivenone (1)-Jonty125
mob deadly
betiko (1)-Rodion
x-stor-x
metsfanmax
rodion
virus90
iron butterfly
Rugbirn (1)-iAmCaffeine
Jonty125
Death by Dr. Seuss (1)-Betiko
With 15 alive it takes 8 to lynch. Deadline is in four days, Monday, March 17th. As of right now under the current rules iAmCaffeine would be lynched at deadline because he is higher than 50% of the required lynch amount.
Also sorry. I hadn't realized it had been so long since my last vote count.
Rodion wrote:Unvote.
Wow, people really seem to have missed what I said.
Again, in bullet points.
1 - I don't think Stor was targeted for a NK.
2 - Rugbirn thinks Stor was targeted for a NK.
3 - I was using that thought from Rugbirn to explain to everyone why Rugbirn softclaimed a protective role (because if he didn't protect Stor, it would be absurd to say Caffeine tried to kill him, since Stor is alive).
X-Stor-X wrote:why was betiko on that vote?
explain?
it would be nice to start day 3 on monday or tues
Users browsing this forum: No registered users