So everyone agrees that the case on me is bigger than this case by jeraado, on safari?
That's the only logical conclusion if I'm being put at L-2, with that last vote from naxus.
jeraado wrote:That claim was a bit out of the blue. I think it's pretty much forced a response from squirrel, so I think we should wait to hear from him.
I read back through saf's posts and a couple of things stood out for me:
1) The number of role-speculation posts. It definitely stood out, and seemed on a couple of occasions to be outright fishing
2)
safariguy5 wrote:So you're now saying Vio is your buddy? Are you claiming masons now?
At the time I thought the mention of masons was a bit odd, but now that he's claiming to be masoned, it makes sense (given that we would assume there would be only one set of masons in the game)
3)
safariguy5 wrote:vote Saxland for not really participating in the game and not contributing to the discussions.
He'd already been revealed as a double-voter and was clearly hampered by the PR, but the vote on him is light and doesn't address the unlikelihood of mafia double-voters
+
safariguy5 wrote:iliad hasn't posted in a while.
unvote vote iliad
Iliad had claimed cop, so unless you are going to make a case that it is a fake-claim, you don't vote for a pro-town asset.
One of these votes I would write off as an oversight, but I'm not so sure about 2.
It'd be good to get the mason claim confirmed by mr squirrel. That being said it wont actually tell us for sure whether saf is being truthful (mafia mason/scumbuddies covering for each other) but it would switch the probability back to being pro-town
If there wasn't another case, you could jump on my actions from the first 2-3 days, but with above case there is a better option.
For the record, if all you want is my claim, I will provide it at L-1.
But with another option out there, I'm confident it won't come to that.