
Moderator: Community Team
Talapus wrote:I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
Koesen wrote:I think AK essentially gave us dozens of pages of nothing yesterday, with a couple of pro town roleclaims that may end up hurting us. Can we take his word for anything now?
Then there's Moz with his weird and not very necessary roleclaim. How big are the odds he discovers the true identity of the one guy he gets a hunch on?
Then there's Exile, who may have slipped up with his jedi remark, although given that his original accusation comes from AK, I'm not sure how meaningful that is.
Wicked and Anark, I now tend to trust (though I'm not sure), and the same goes for Fircoal (as much as it pains me to say that, hehe).
Nagerous hints at being pro town too, and I tend to believe him, inspite of his continuing suspicions of me. I guess you suspect me for not being sure if either of the duelists is on my side. That remark was based on the fact that there are several jedi knights in the Star Wars Saga who go over to the dark side. Force does not equal Good in the Star Wars stories (Darth Vader, Palpatine, Darth Maul, Count Dooku) and I would not be surprised if a similar twist awaits us here.
Anybody else I had thoughts on, I forgot them, hehe.
Minister Masket wrote:For those who didn't know, Leia IS a Skywalker, and was very strong in the force. She did train to be a Jedi in the NJO.
Interesting point there if she commited suicide after learning of her husband's death. (lightsabre hara-kiri?).
I doupt it though.
EDIT: I've forgotten how to spell "doupt".
The1exile wrote:EDIT: I've forgotten how to spell "doupt".
No editing dummy
wicked wrote:Gimpy good catch. It's typical for scum to give a group of 3 they trust, with two being good guys and one being scum. So for example, Kozy gave no real reason for trusting me, Ank and Fircola. I would bet we'll find out one of those three is scum.
And if anyone's wondering where I got that "1 scum in group of 3" logic, it's from dagreatbroomhead, who was the first person to start mafia on this site and had a book of "tells" he shared with us one game. That was one of them. I've found all his other tells and tricks to work well, and he showed that this one usually works too. Not saying it's set in stone, but it's just another tick mark for Ank and Fircola on my possible scum list. And definitely reason to keep an eye on the three listed by Kozy.
wicked wrote:Gimpy good catch. It's typical for scum to give a group of 3 they trust, with two being good guys and one being scum. So for example, Kozy gave no real reason for trusting me, Ank and Fircola. I would bet we'll find out one of those three is scum.
And if anyone's wondering where I got that "1 scum in group of 3" logic, it's from dagreatbroomhead, who was the first person to start mafia on this site and had a book of "tells" he shared with us one game. That was one of them. I've found all his other tells and tricks to work well, and he showed that this one usually works too. Not saying it's set in stone, but it's just another tick mark for Ank and Fircola on my possible scum list. And definitely reason to keep an eye on the three listed by Kozy.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
I got a dog lead!Huckleberryhound wrote:Ok, i gotta say....i'm totally lost in this game. I was sure that AK was scum considering his dumbass lying.
Anyone got any real leads ?
trestain wrote:Aanark, your first post of day 2 and already on the defensive, now i'm not getting into another arguement with you for most of the day but i am still suspicious of you because of reasons stated day 1 and also your reaction to wickeds post, as that is a good scum strategy and i would expect(as you have done) scum to be the ones to shoot it down if there were any on that list, so
FOS Anarchistdream
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Anarkistsdream wrote:trestain wrote:Aanark, your first post of day 2 and already on the defensive, now i'm not getting into another arguement with you for most of the day but i am still suspicious of you because of reasons stated day 1 and also your reaction to wickeds post, as that is a good scum strategy and i would expect(as you have done) scum to be the ones to shoot it down if there were any on that list, so
FOS Anarchistdream
You are saying that the people that a known dead scum thought were suspicious are good people to look for the next day???
You have totally lost your marbles. So far, you have not contributed one thing to this entire game... Over 60 pages of it and you have come up with no ideas, no thoughts... You are singularly fixated on one target, and that is me.
Well, if it makes you feel any better I am Wedge... So, please, piss off.
And spell my name right, Tree stain.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users