I think I said mostly all I wanted to say. Here are my posts on the subject, like 20 pages back lmfao. They are in order chronologically:
MoB Deadly wrote:My head is spinning on Rodion.
fos rodion for the directions of power roles. Yes I know Strike did it, but his was one sentence in a paragraph to get the point across. Your post was a list of instructions for multiple power roles. Strikes purpose of posting wasn't to direct power roles, yours was.
fos rodion for you escalating your jokevote case to this ridiculous level. I feel like your vote towards chap is mostly OMGUS based upon his disagreements with you in that case. You say we have all the evidence in this thread. Could you please quote or highlight chap's scummiest posts?
fos rodion/betiko for possible linkage. I want to get to the bottom of this, I feel this is a constant thorn in our side that we need to understand, so we know where we need to focus in this game.
I don't necessarily know if we need to address this now or a different day. Strike said, we should cut out losses. Does anyone else have an opinion if we should move on from this before we shoot ourselves in the foot more, or are we safe to keep investigating?
MoB Deadly wrote:Rodion wrote:Mob,
"Strike wrote a line, Rodion wrote a paragraph."
So what? If you compare both texts, the only difference is I added the watcher instructions, something I had already done the previous day and a possible reason our doctor is still alive (perhaps mafia felt intimidated and didn't kill the doctor when it's possible we don't even have a watcher).
And know you're reading minds to say Strike's purpose was different? Alright, think what you want...
"Rodion is escalating his jokevote / Also, where is the evidence"?
I'm not sure how much evidence you want. Chap made a mess out of the Epitaph case, FOS him and me an taking days to clear the whole mess. Now we have evidence of Chap calling me out on instructions while ignoring Strike. That's probably not enough in your book since you're also applying 2 standards for Strike and me, right? So, how about the fact he flat out lied while trying to incriminate me in his last post?
[quote="chapcrap"Multiple posts containing information about how he wants town to act. Including telling the cop, doctor, and watcher what actions to take.
Lie in red. Is that evidence enough or would you like me to scavenge old posts for more?
Town Instructions: Day 1 with only 1 claim, I feel yes, be as specific as possible to that the mafia are too intimidated to even think about killing the claimed role. Any other day with multiple claims, I don't feel it should be as spelled out as you made it. I prefer Strikes method of just saying what should be said and then moving on with the rest of his post. I just dont like how your whole post was directed at night actions. I feel like you want to make it so obvious to those roles to what to do so that they are predictable. If all of our actions are 100% predictable, it makes it that much easier for scum to pick us apart.
That is just my opinion. I don't consider this evidence in a case, if I did, it is tiny and not very meaningful.
I actually agree with what you said about chap. I don't like how he messed up the epitaph case, and I don't like that red line either. Its hard for me to determine if its a difficult town vs scum case of who can debate better, or if both of you are just OMGUSing each other because you want to be the leaders of this game.
My suspicion against you is just a bunch of little things that are snowballing for me. I think your suspicions on chap are definitely valid, but I feel like I have more things against you than chap.
Fastposted by Rodion - Definitely waiting for Chap's response to this.
I bolded those lines in my original post, I just hilighted them red now.