Moderator: Community Team
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
strike wolf wrote:I assume you're referring to the man who felt his voice carried less weight, Safari? I was curious about that too wasn't sure what it meant.
jonty125 wrote:strike wolf wrote:I assume you're referring to the man who felt his voice carried less weight, Safari? I was curious about that too wasn't sure what it meant.
Yes, I think that's what he meant. (Well, upon re-reading it, it looks like it)
edocsil wrote:Knifes flashed (obviously there's a NK action), swords were drawn (yeah...), ropes were tied around struggling opponents (roleblocker?), flames burst (arsonist? I might be looking into this too literally) and lightning even struck the same place thrice (looks like someone was popular last night).
However, nothing happened, at least not that could be seen (so maybe things happened that we don't see, maybe a cult?). 25 beings assembled in the morning, more then slightly confused at their current number. Some felt a little confused (cult?), others felt their words carried less weight (I agree, someone got their vot stolen), but at least they all were present.
/ wrote:"Lightning" may indicate the very uncommon "Lightning Rod" role, or some variation of it, if so, the actions might have been screwed up last night (or at least three of them)
Iliad wrote:Well, my vote was stolen, so that's what the night scene is referring to.
Good thing, I have two of them I suppose. Good work docs I suppose, it's a bit of an odd position that we're in day 2 and still no deaths though.
jak111 wrote:If we don't got any new information, I'd suggest a no lynch to FORCE some sort of action so we have results, better than accidentally lynching a town power role today.
ShaggyDan wrote:I have nothing to report from the night.jak111 wrote:If we don't got any new information, I'd suggest a no lynch to FORCE some sort of action so we have results, better than accidentally lynching a town power role today.
Town's power is our lynch, it would be silly to not at least attempt to use it. We can easily not lynch after a claim, but to rush straight into a no lynch and go to night is just ridiculous. So far the only info we have is a double voter being outed, applying pressure and getting some info is more likely to help us rather than hurt us.
Vote Jak for suggesting a no-lynch so early.
jak111 wrote:ShaggyDan wrote:I have nothing to report from the night.jak111 wrote:If we don't got any new information, I'd suggest a no lynch to FORCE some sort of action so we have results, better than accidentally lynching a town power role today.
Town's power is our lynch, it would be silly to not at least attempt to use it. We can easily not lynch after a claim, but to rush straight into a no lynch and go to night is just ridiculous. So far the only info we have is a double voter being outed, applying pressure and getting some info is more likely to help us rather than hurt us.
Vote Jak for suggesting a no-lynch so early.
But not in the case where we may out a doc, cop, etc to the mafia. If we always just look for claims without testing them we might as well not loook for them at all, this way they can at least have more information before being publicly exposed.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
jak111 wrote:ShaggyDan wrote:I have nothing to report from the night.jak111 wrote:If we don't got any new information, I'd suggest a no lynch to FORCE some sort of action so we have results, better than accidentally lynching a town power role today.
Town's power is our lynch, it would be silly to not at least attempt to use it. We can easily not lynch after a claim, but to rush straight into a no lynch and go to night is just ridiculous. So far the only info we have is a double voter being outed, applying pressure and getting some info is more likely to help us rather than hurt us.
Vote Jak for suggesting a no-lynch so early.
But not in the case where we may out a doc, cop, etc to the mafia. If we always just look for claims without testing them we might as well not loook for them at all, this way they can at least have more information before being publicly exposed.
edocsil wrote:However, nothing happened, at least not that could be seen.
jak111 wrote:Sha bam.. did you all really think I lost my mind that quickly? Look at this nice band wagon we got here How many little piggies can we count on it? Out of the 6 or so voting I'd say 3. Easy bandwagons look attractive to mafia and like bugs to bug zappers they all fry down.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users