Moderator: Community Team
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
In that past Day 1 we aren't going to lynch someone for being inactive unless the deadline forces us too?DoomYoshi wrote:The rest is directed at aage:
In what way does my vote slow down the game?
spiesr wrote:In that past Day 1 we aren't going to lynch someone for being inactive unless the deadline forces us too?DoomYoshi wrote:The rest is directed at aage:
In what way does my vote slow down the game?
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
DoomYoshi wrote:spiesr wrote:In that past Day 1 we aren't going to lynch someone for being inactive unless the deadline forces us to?DoomYoshi wrote:The rest is directed at aage:
In what way does my vote slow down the game?
The longer the game goes on, the more liability they are to not only town, but the entire game.
Because you choose to ignore that information. Also, my post was longer than "vote doom".If there is so much information, why is the best vote you can manage the one on me?
DoomYoshi wrote:Neb is super scummy. However, when someone thrusts themself into the radar that much, I don't see much benefit in adding votes to the case.
Lynching scummy people actually does yield benefit. You should explain why you don't just put your money where your mouth is, because this argument is ridiculous.
The Stubbs slip-up was interesting, but not enough to hang over - it is in exactly the same boat as my case on /, so I can't go there. TFO is also borderline inactive, but blake moreso.
I agree on all parts, irrelevant mostly... except that we shouldn't care about Blake.
Don't have much of a read on saf/dj.
/ is still scummiest in my books, although I don't have much of a case on him. Since I can't fabricate a case out of nothing, I have to wait. I would like to wait by killing off inactives.
Inactives likely are town. Scummy people are more likely to be scum (hence the adjective). Your reasoning is easy and faulty, and I don't see how this benefits town.
aage wrote:Sorry about the doublepost.DoomYoshi wrote:Neb is super scummy. However, when someone thrusts themself into the radar that much, I don't see much benefit in adding votes to the case.
Lynching scummy people actually does yield benefit. You should explain why you don't just put your money where your mouth is, because this argument is ridiculous.
The Stubbs slip-up was interesting, but not enough to hang over - it is in exactly the same boat as my case on /, so I can't go there. TFO is also borderline inactive, but blake moreso.
I agree on all parts, irrelevant mostly... except that we shouldn't care about Blake.
Don't have much of a read on saf/dj.
/ is still scummiest in my books, although I don't have much of a case on him. Since I can't fabricate a case out of nothing, I have to wait. I would like to wait by killing off inactives.
Inactives likely are town. Scummy people are more likely to be scum (hence the adjective). Your reasoning is easy and faulty, and I don't see how this benefits town.
Do I want to lynch Doom over this? I think I do. But several others are fine too.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
edocsil wrote:Bah. Doom is right on all regards. Inactives kill the game, make it not fun due to the inability to deal with them weighing down votes, and are a general pain in the ass. The only reason this has been an issue to point it out was because it delayed our short day. We really need to resolve this fast, else this coming lynch is going to be decided by just a few votes because we in fact do not need a majority to lynch.
I would HIGHLY recommend forcing one of them (neb/doom/other scummies) to claim quickly, analyze the information and make a plan from there regarding a lynch, but we don't want to hang people who haven't claimed for several reasons.
We can't waste time here, so if you haven't weighed in on these issues or voted, please do so shortly or your voices will be ignored.
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
new guy1 wrote:Ill take a night to think about the case on doomyoshi, and Ill Unvote, vote blake so that we dont mislynch a townie in haste.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
safariguy5 wrote:Yeah, I don't see how you can buy into Doom's vote on the inactive neb. All things being equal, it's statistically much more likely that an inactive is town rather than mafia. I agree that he needs to be replaced rather than lynched. If we lynch the inactive, it doesn't give us any good bandwagon information because both town and mafia can vote for the inactive with little to distinguish themselves with regards to vote position.
vote neb
DoomYoshi wrote:Test it on me. Tree stump is my favorite role anyway lol. Next time I am picking Wispy Woods as my character.
Nebuchadnezer wrote:safariguy5 wrote:Yeah, I don't see how you can buy into Doom's vote on the inactive neb. All things being equal, it's statistically much more likely that an inactive is town rather than mafia. I agree that he needs to be replaced rather than lynched. If we lynch the inactive, it doesn't give us any good bandwagon information because both town and mafia can vote for the inactive with little to distinguish themselves with regards to vote position.
vote neb
Ya, with Doom and myself being the only other players getting votes at this point, my options are limited. I could start a new case, but then edoc will probably jump on me saying that I'm "splitting the vote" again. Is an inactive the best target? No. Is it a better target than me or Doom? Yes.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Nebuchadnezer wrote:safariguy5 wrote:Yeah, I don't see how you can buy into Doom's vote on the inactive neb. All things being equal, it's statistically much more likely that an inactive is town rather than mafia. I agree that he needs to be replaced rather than lynched. If we lynch the inactive, it doesn't give us any good bandwagon information because both town and mafia can vote for the inactive with little to distinguish themselves with regards to vote position.
vote neb
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
If more people acted with this logic then there won't be significant pressure on him and he won't be especially likely to fall apart. So, why do you seem to think you are privileged to get to go off and do your own thing while relying on others take care of pressing matters?DoomYoshi wrote:Why would I worry about Neb? Guarantee he is the default target for the majority of investigative roles already. At this point, if he is scum, he is going to start worrying and backpedaling so I don't need to add any more pressure... if he is truly scum, I will find out before too long.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users