Ditocoaf wrote:riggable, do you think you could replace the "points total" collumn (useless, imho), with a ranking? If it's not too much trouble.
sure i'll see what I can do.
3 more PMs!
Moderator: Community Team
Ditocoaf wrote:riggable, do you think you could replace the "points total" collumn (useless, imho), with a ranking? If it's not too much trouble.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
Ditocoaf wrote:dustn64 wrote:ok, 95 - 70 now.
you were wrong last time.
I think you're trying to predetermine the range, in order to benefit yourself. If people trust your judgment here, it will be the ideal situation for you, no?
dustn64 wrote:Ditocoaf wrote:dustn64 wrote:ok, 95 - 70 now.
you were wrong last time.
I think you're trying to predetermine the range, in order to benefit yourself. If people trust your judgment here, it will be the ideal situation for you, no?
Hmm.... I said something about 70 being the bottom number.... Was I wrong this time?
dustn64 wrote:Ditocoaf wrote:dustn64 wrote:ok, 95 - 70 now.
you were wrong last time.
I think you're trying to predetermine the range, in order to benefit yourself. If people trust your judgment here, it will be the ideal situation for you, no?
Hmm.... I said something about 70 being the bottom number.... Was I wrong this time?
riggable wrote:
send in those PMs!
its becoming faster now that there are less people.
Check out the new Ranks!
-riggable
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
pmchugh wrote:Dam im so far behind, only amino's doing worse.Oh well at least im still in the race.
Ditocoaf wrote:pmchugh wrote:Dam im so far behind, only amino's doing worse.Oh well at least im still in the race.
no, illiad and dittoeevee are also doing worse than you.
riggable wrote:
Please send in your PMs As soon as possible. Thanks!
Congratz to the survivors!
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users