caymanmew wrote:max is gr8 wrote:Is Lack South of Fos-Sur-Mer?
second
Moderator: Community Team
caymanmew wrote:max is gr8 wrote:Is Lack South of Fos-Sur-Mer?
second
Mr. Squirrel wrote:pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
One fool reporting for duty!
max is gr8 wrote:It restricts lacks location to being approximately west of Saint Raphael. Draw a line at 90 degrees from Fos-Sur-Mer and you'll see whereabouts.
caymanmew wrote:max is gr8 wrote:Is Lack South of Fos-Sur-Mer?
second
nippersean wrote:Don't we currently have him east of 45°56'22" E (The west edge of the docks at Fos-Sur-Mer) anywhere along coast to Italian border?
the.killing.44 wrote:He has to be on the coast. There's a wide expanse of water in the picture.
This is what we've narrowed it down to:
Is lack east of Nice, France?
Mr. Squirrel wrote:pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
One fool reporting for duty!
the.killing.44 wrote:Ehh, I take that question back. Pretty stupid.
How about: is lack east of Sainte-Maxime?
MudPuppy wrote:the.killing.44 wrote:Ehh, I take that question back. Pretty stupid.
How about: is lack east of Sainte-Maxime?
Seconded.
the.killing.44 wrote:Okay, NOW is lack east of Nice?
Mr. Squirrel wrote:pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
One fool reporting for duty!
colton24 wrote:the.killing.44 wrote:Okay, NOW is lack east of Nice?
2nd
nippersean wrote:there are some large lakes "up t' north" that could still screw us. So just to be safe I suggest a mid point on the south coast, where we believe the turtle is resting / chilling and put a distance restriction. Still think it would have to be a bloody big lake on the photo. A man that's $200,000 richer, if he takes Ronc up on his offer - wouldn't he go somewhere more flashy?
Still think we're nailing him on South of France coast - but his gaff don't look to clever.
Too much like Cleethorpes on a lucky day if you ask me - but then you didn't
the.killing.44 wrote:
Hmm…maybe is lack east of Cannes (43° 33′ 4.85″ N, 7° 0′ 45.91″ E)?
wcaclimbing wrote:the.killing.44 wrote:
Hmm…maybe is lack east of Cannes (43° 33′ 4.85″ N, 7° 0′ 45.91″ E)?
seconded.
the.killing.44 wrote:nippersean wrote:there are some large lakes "up t' north" that could still screw us. So just to be safe I suggest a mid point on the south coast, where we believe the turtle is resting / chilling and put a distance restriction. Still think it would have to be a bloody big lake on the photo. A man that's $200,000 richer, if he takes Ronc up on his offer - wouldn't he go somewhere more flashy?
Still think we're nailing him on South of France coast - but his gaff don't look to clever.
Too much like Cleethorpes on a lucky day if you ask me - but then you didn't
We've established he's South of Lyon. Any lakes under there?
Hmm…maybe is lack east of Cannes (43° 33′ 4.85″ N, 7° 0′ 45.91″ E)?
nippersean wrote:yes but i think we should kick on with the south coast plan
the.killing.44 wrote:nippersean wrote:yes but i think we should kick on with the south coast plan
I'm not sure. We're already on Question #13, and we can see from the picture that the body of water stretches out to the horizon. So I post the question:
is lack east of Fréjus, France (43°25′59″N 6°44′13″E)
wcaclimbing wrote:the.killing.44 wrote:nippersean wrote:yes but i think we should kick on with the south coast plan
I'm not sure. We're already on Question #13, and we can see from the picture that the body of water stretches out to the horizon. So I post the question:
is lack east of Fréjus, France (43°25′59″N 6°44′13″E)
seconded
gregwolf121 wrote:looking at a close up it seems to me that there is a good chance that lack is in frejus, so next question is lack in Fréjus, France (43°25′59″N 6°44′13″E)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users