Moderator: Cartographers
AndyDufresne wrote:Thanks for your enthusiasim. Right now, we aren't looking for any more classic-copy maps. Of course maps can be inspired by the general layout and structure, as a number of maps are. If you are interested in making a map, read over some of the guidelines and check out the map ideas and suggestions.
--Andy
sailorseal wrote:Classic Fast Food?
the.killing.44 wrote:sailorseal wrote:Classic Fast Food?
wth ⦠?
.44
[img][URL=http://img3.imageshack.us/my.php?image=14439591.png][IMG]http://img3.imageshack.us/img3/7196/14439591.th.png[/IMG][/URL][/img]
[img][URL=http://img15.imageshack.us/my.php?image=35978619.png][IMG]http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/2020/35978619.th.png[/IMG][/URL][/img]
Like this ?maxatstuy wrote:As we all know, the old "Classic" is gone and we were told that we cannot create a map that is similar to the Hasbro map. However, I was thinking of a new idea that takes the old Classic map and modifies it to make it different enough that it can still be used.
What if we took the original map and added an Arctic and Antarctic to the top and bottom of the maps respectively. Each would be three territories, and if the entire Arctic or Antarctic is held, would give an added deployment of 1 man per turn, or 3 men per turn if both are held simultaneously. The three Arctic territories would be able to attack Greenland, Scandinavia, and Siberia, while the three Antarctic territories would be able to attack Argentina, South Africa, and Western Australia.
Finally, the South America Bonus would be worth 3 armies instead of 2, and Africa would be worth 4 armies instead of 3
What do you guys think?
Yeah, It was an attempted revamp with Zim, the original author of 2.1.herschal wrote:Isn't that just a remake of world 2.1? The current world 2.1 is fine IMHO.
porkenbeans wrote:Yeah, It was an attempted revamp with gimil, the original author of 2.1.herschal wrote:Isn't that just a remake of world 2.1? The current world 2.1 is fine IMHO.
Brain fart.the.killing.44 wrote:porkenbeans wrote:Yeah, It was an attempted revamp with gimil, the original author of 2.1.herschal wrote:Isn't that just a remake of world 2.1? The current world 2.1 is fine IMHO.
zim ... zim ...
.44
Who are you trying to kid ?xelabale wrote:Maybe you guys should stop saying the "c" word and you might get a bit further. Or the "H" word or anything else connect with "R". This thread seems to be the receptacle for "Doh" moments.
Return to Melting Pot: Map Ideas
Users browsing this forum: No registered users