Moderator: Cartographers
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
yeti_c wrote:Can I shoot steve the bunny in the face?
If not - I hate this map!!
C.
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
bryguy wrote:yay! stevey is alive!
the only thing is, he seems hypnotized.... maybe him wiggling his ears every 10-20 seconds?
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
gimil wrote:bryguy wrote:yay! stevey is alive!
the only thing is, he seems hypnotized.... maybe him wiggling his ears every 10-20 seconds?
The bigger the animation the bigger the file size . . .
Kaplowitz wrote:Great gimil, that looks awesome.
I think the animation is fine, but if bryguy really wants to, making we could have a cloud move a little or something. Idk, we dont want the file to get too big.
yeti_c wrote:Kaplowitz wrote:Great gimil, that looks awesome.
I think the animation is fine, but if bryguy really wants to, making we could have a cloud move a little or something. Idk, we dont want the file to get too big.
Or a wink by Mr sun.
C.
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
gimil wrote:yeti_c wrote:Kaplowitz wrote:Great gimil, that looks awesome.
I think the animation is fine, but if bryguy really wants to, making we could have a cloud move a little or something. Idk, we dont want the file to get too big.
Or a wink by Mr sun.
C.
But hte suns wearing sun glasses to keep the sun out his eyes.
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
White: Black: Blue: Gold: Bullseye:
10 yards 1 2 3 4 5
20 yards 2* 3 5* 6 8*
30 yards 2 4 6 8 10
40 yards 3 6 9 12 15
*rounded up
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
gimil wrote:zimmah im going to agree with kap. The maps is currently simple and understandable, lets keep it that way.
mibi wrote:who would attack 25 neutrals to get a +5 when a +4 is only 8.
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
gimil wrote:mibi wrote:who would attack 25 neutrals to get a +5 when a +4 is only 8.
Because attack the 25 neutrals actually gets you +20 . . .
mibi wrote:gimil wrote:mibi wrote:who would attack 25 neutrals to get a +5 when a +4 is only 8.
Because attack the 25 neutrals actually gets you +20 . . .
I don't understand the bonus system then. Care yo explain it for me.
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
gimil wrote:mibi wrote:gimil wrote:mibi wrote:who would attack 25 neutrals to get a +5 when a +4 is only 8.
Because attack the 25 neutrals actually gets you +20 . . .
I don't understand the bonus system then. Care yo explain it for me.
All colours earn the same bonus no matter what distance the target is. However the bullseyes get a larger bonus for the further away targets.
The 40 yard bullseye gets a +15 (the 25 neutral 1) plus an extra +5 for being a red target.
mibi wrote:gimil wrote:mibi wrote:gimil wrote:mibi wrote:who would attack 25 neutrals to get a +5 when a +4 is only 8.
Because attack the 25 neutrals actually gets you +20 . . .
I don't understand the bonus system then. Care yo explain it for me.
All colours earn the same bonus no matter what distance the target is. However the bullseyes get a larger bonus for the further away targets.
The 40 yard bullseye gets a +15 (the 25 neutral 1) plus an extra +5 for being a red target.
so if i am on the 40yrd bulls eye, 15 is autodeployed on my archer and then i get +5?
you might want to change the color of the arch bonus, white on light blue is a bit hard to read. try darker blue on light blue.
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
Kaplowitz wrote:I thought it was the bullseye was +5 no matter what, and then the whole target is worth bigger bonuses. So if you hold 40 white, blue, black, gold, and bullseye you get +30?
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
gimil wrote:Kaplowitz wrote:I thought it was the bullseye was +5 no matter what, and then the whole target is worth bigger bonuses. So if you hold 40 white, blue, black, gold, and bullseye you get +30?
Is it the whole target? I didnt know that . . .
Kaplowitz wrote:gimil wrote:Kaplowitz wrote:I thought it was the bullseye was +5 no matter what, and then the whole target is worth bigger bonuses. So if you hold 40 white, blue, black, gold, and bullseye you get +30?
Is it the whole target? I didnt know that . . .
Thats what i originally had it as, we can change it though.
Which do you think is better?
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
Return to Melting Pot: Map Ideas
Users browsing this forum: No registered users