everywhere116 wrote:One thing. If this is in the future, the map would not look like this. North America is moving away from Europe.
Does it matter? Let's focus on perfecting the map and stop quibbleing about trivial facts
Moderator: Cartographers
everywhere116 wrote:One thing. If this is in the future, the map would not look like this. North America is moving away from Europe.
 sfhbballnut
				sfhbballnut
			



 
		sfhbballnut wrote:everywhere116 wrote:One thing. If this is in the future, the map would not look like this. North America is moving away from Europe.
Does it matter? Let's focus on perfecting the map and stop quibbleing about trivial facts

 kclborat
				kclborat
			qwert wrote:Can i ask you something?What is porpose for you to open these Political topic in ConquerClub? Why you mix politic with Risk? Why you not open topic like HOT AND SEXY,or something like that.

 Guiscard
				Guiscard
			 
		

 RjBeals
				RjBeals
			






 
			 I really like it when they pop up outa nowhere looking really nicely done.
  I really like it when they pop up outa nowhere looking really nicely done.qwert wrote:Can i ask you something?What is porpose for you to open these Political topic in ConquerClub? Why you mix politic with Risk? Why you not open topic like HOT AND SEXY,or something like that.

 Guiscard
				Guiscard
			 
		

 oaktown
				oaktown
			









 
		oaktown wrote:i'm still a bit troubled with antarctica and oceania - whoever scores a good start down there can go after both continents, and only have to defend them from two points. That's a big land mass to be able to hide out in. Is an antartica-south america attack route out of the question?
qwert wrote:Can i ask you something?What is porpose for you to open these Political topic in ConquerClub? Why you mix politic with Risk? Why you not open topic like HOT AND SEXY,or something like that.

 Guiscard
				Guiscard
			 
		
 AndyDufresne
				AndyDufresne
			











 
			Guiscard wrote:Either that or to africa off the bottom and onto the top edge... would be fine on a real globe, just might look a bit off...


 oaktown
				oaktown
			









 
		qwert wrote:Can i ask you something?What is porpose for you to open these Political topic in ConquerClub? Why you mix politic with Risk? Why you not open topic like HOT AND SEXY,or something like that.

 Guiscard
				Guiscard
			 
		
 johloh
				johloh
			






 
			-i feel like the lakes in the middle should have a different look than the outside ocean...
-I think the title block (metal?) is pretty ugly.

qwert wrote:Can i ask you something?What is porpose for you to open these Political topic in ConquerClub? Why you mix politic with Risk? Why you not open topic like HOT AND SEXY,or something like that.

 Guiscard
				Guiscard
			 
		
 unriggable
				unriggable
			


 
		qwert wrote:Can i ask you something?What is porpose for you to open these Political topic in ConquerClub? Why you mix politic with Risk? Why you not open topic like HOT AND SEXY,or something like that.

 Guiscard
				Guiscard
			 
		oaktown wrote:Guiscard wrote:Either that or to africa off the bottom and onto the top edge... would be fine on a real globe, just might look a bit off...
Usually maps don't work like that - no connection between south pole and north pole.
Think about rotating the southern land mass clockwise about 15 degrees, so you can have both Aus attack routes into different territories in Asia, and a route from Ant. to S. Am.

 unriggable
				unriggable
			


 
		
 Gabrioche
				Gabrioche
			

 
		KEYOGI wrote:Lovely map. I'm just wondering whether those mountains between Oceania and Antarctica need to be there. Unless they're a result of the continental shifts, they seem out of place.
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "

 Skittles!
				Skittles!
			





 
		Return to Melting Pot: Map Ideas
Users browsing this forum: No registered users