Conquer Club

Red vs. Blue [Abandoned]

Have an idea for a map? Discuss ideas and concepts here.

Moderator: Cartographers

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Would you play this?

 
Total votes : 0

Red vs. Blue [Abandoned]

Postby Kaplowitz on Tue Apr 29, 2008 8:19 pm

well i had little hw tonight, and i got kinda bored so i fooled around with a map.

Click image to enlarge.
image

Basically you start at the Recruitment Center, and the rest are neutrals. Bunks have 1 neutral and others vary.

I was just wondering if you would actually play a map like this, conquest style, but more modern and symmetrical. Im not necessarily going to make this map, i was just bored and wondering.
Image
User avatar
Private 1st Class Kaplowitz
 
Posts: 3088
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 5:11 pm

Re: Red vs. Blue

Postby InkL0sed on Tue Apr 29, 2008 8:21 pm

If you're basing this off the show, DO IT

But also make it funny.

PS. Also, it would be cool to have a 1v1 map. And I mean ONLY 1v1. If this was conquest, it would fit that description, and would have my undying support.
User avatar
Lieutenant InkL0sed
 
Posts: 2370
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 4:06 pm
Location: underwater

Re: Red vs. Blue

Postby Kaplowitz on Tue Apr 29, 2008 8:23 pm

InkL0sed wrote:If you're basing this off the show, DO IT

But also make it funny.

I wasnt really planning on it. YOu mean the Halo one right?
Click image to enlarge.
image


OH YEA! I forgot to mention: Could this be a 2 player only map? Theres no room for others...
Image
User avatar
Private 1st Class Kaplowitz
 
Posts: 3088
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 5:11 pm

Re: Red vs. Blue

Postby InkL0sed on Tue Apr 29, 2008 8:24 pm

See my edit ;)

And yes, the Halo-machinima one. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_vs._Blue
User avatar
Lieutenant InkL0sed
 
Posts: 2370
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 4:06 pm
Location: underwater

Re: Red vs. Blue

Postby Kaplowitz on Tue Apr 29, 2008 8:26 pm

Yea, but im not sure if im allowed to do that....ik that Feudal and AoR cant be more than 6, but that might be an exception because it was made before 7 + 8 player games....
Image
User avatar
Private 1st Class Kaplowitz
 
Posts: 3088
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 5:11 pm

Re: Red vs. Blue

Postby InkL0sed on Tue Apr 29, 2008 8:28 pm

Kaplowitz wrote:Yea, but im not sure if im allowed to do that....ik that Feudal and AoR cant be more than 6, but that might be an exception because it was made before 7 + 8 player games....


But it would be so cool... certainly we could get mod support if we had popular support? I'll go check the guidelines to see what it says on the matter.

EDIT: The only thing I can see is the requirement for the gameplay stamp that says maps cannot be designed with specific settings in mind. But I'm sure the rules can be bent a little here.
User avatar
Lieutenant InkL0sed
 
Posts: 2370
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 4:06 pm
Location: underwater

Re: Red vs. Blue

Postby ZeakCytho on Tue Apr 29, 2008 8:31 pm

:(

This just doesn't interest me. I don't really have anything constructive to say, but good luck with this.
User avatar
Captain ZeakCytho
 
Posts: 1251
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 4:36 pm

Re: Red vs. Blue

Postby Herakilla on Tue Apr 29, 2008 8:34 pm

do it! i would love to see a map geared solely for 1v1 play. i think some of the cartos said something sometime about wanting a larger variety of maps which would include those for 1v1. plus this would really be a step forward for duels
Come join us in Live Chat!
User avatar
Lieutenant Herakilla
 
Posts: 4283
Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 8:33 pm
Location: Wandering the world, spreading Conquerism

Re: Red vs. Blue

Postby tubaman on Tue Apr 29, 2008 8:39 pm

I like the idea, try to make it work with just 2 players. I think if you add more bases to fit 6 to 8 players it will just look like a remake of feudal war or AoR.
Image
User avatar
Colonel tubaman
 
Posts: 145
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 12:13 am
Location: Philly

Re: Red vs. Blue

Postby TaCktiX on Tue Apr 29, 2008 9:22 pm

A great idea for a duel map, though I'd say cap out how many bonus armies for pressing into enemy territory. You could own just 5 of the enemy's bunkers and have a sizable advantage over him that would only be amplified per bunker. Perhaps some Conquerman territory adjustment idea?

Definitely continue this map, I think we need duel maps on CC, regardless if it limits its playability.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class TaCktiX
 
Posts: 2392
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 8:24 pm
Location: Rapid City, SD

Re: Red vs. Blue

Postby edbeard on Tue Apr 29, 2008 10:56 pm

I think this map would be better if not made into a 1v1 map where you start on recruitment centers


I'd rather see players start on bases (except the grey ones which would start neutral)

Then maybe add and/or change around a few of the 'special territories' which would also start neutral.


These changes would make the map kinda like arms race where you start on non-special territories, you're fighting over special territories and maybe trying to win half of the map before moving to the other half. It'd probably be best to get rid of the airforce if you follow my idea.
User avatar
Lieutenant edbeard
 
Posts: 2501
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 12:41 am

Re: Red vs. Blue

Postby oaktown on Tue Apr 29, 2008 11:54 pm

I have just one word to say about this map: plasagna.

:roll:
User avatar
Captain oaktown
 
Posts: 4451
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 9:24 pm
Location: majorcommand

Re: Red vs. Blue

Postby yeti_c on Wed Apr 30, 2008 10:29 am

This map wouldn't work.

No territories would be assigned as the engine looks for groups of 3 territories to randomly assign 1 Red, 1 Green, 1 White.

Also - bearing in mind that you'd be looking at Red vs Green... it'd be probably be better to make it 2 different colours away from Red Vs Blue.

C.
Image
Highest score : 2297
User avatar
Lieutenant yeti_c
 
Posts: 9624
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:02 am

Re: Red vs. Blue

Postby RjBeals on Wed Apr 30, 2008 2:00 pm

oaktown wrote:I have just one word to say about this map: plasagna.

:roll:



=D> =D> #-o #-o :lol: :lol:

viewtopic.php?f=10&t=15055&st=0&sk=t&sd=a&start=30
Image
User avatar
Private RjBeals
 
Posts: 2506
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 5:17 pm
Location: South Carolina, USA

Re: Red vs. Blue

Postby bryguy on Wed Apr 30, 2008 2:04 pm

I like it, the wording makes it funny :D
Corporal bryguy
 
Posts: 4381
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 8:50 am
Location: Lost in a Jigsaw

Re: Red vs. Blue

Postby Kaplowitz on Wed Apr 30, 2008 6:51 pm

edbeard wrote:I think this map would be better if not made into a 1v1 map where you start on recruitment centers


I'd rather see players start on bases (except the grey ones which would start neutral)

Then maybe add and/or change around a few of the 'special territories' which would also start neutral.


These changes would make the map kinda like arms race where you start on non-special territories, you're fighting over special territories and maybe trying to win half of the map before moving to the other half. It'd probably be best to get rid of the airforce if you follow my idea.

Im not really sure what you mean. ARe you saying make it with 8 bases? Or have Red and Blue, but have seperate bases within each color and have people fight for the color? The only problem with that is like in 5 player games, where 4 people start in Red and 1 starts in Blue.
Image
User avatar
Private 1st Class Kaplowitz
 
Posts: 3088
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 5:11 pm

Re: Red vs. Blue

Postby Kaplowitz on Wed Apr 30, 2008 6:53 pm

yeti_c wrote:This map wouldn't work.

No territories would be assigned as the engine looks for groups of 3 territories to randomly assign 1 Red, 1 Green, 1 White.

Also - bearing in mind that you'd be looking at Red vs Green... it'd be probably be better to make it 2 different colours away from Red Vs Blue.

C.


1-I realize that, but if Lack is willing to make this a 1v1 map only, couldnt he also just eliminate the third neutral person too? or is that part of the game engine?

I can change the colors with a click of a button. Any suggestions?
Image
User avatar
Private 1st Class Kaplowitz
 
Posts: 3088
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 5:11 pm

Re: Red vs. Blue

Postby Kaplowitz on Wed Apr 30, 2008 6:54 pm

TaCktiX wrote:A great idea for a duel map, though I'd say cap out how many bonus armies for pressing into enemy territory. You could own just 5 of the enemy's bunkers and have a sizable advantage over him that would only be amplified per bunker. Perhaps some Conquerman territory adjustment idea?

Definitely continue this map, I think we need duel maps on CC, regardless if it limits its playability.


Well then protect yourself!! Or i can just change it....
Image
User avatar
Private 1st Class Kaplowitz
 
Posts: 3088
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 5:11 pm

Re: Red vs. Blue

Postby bryguy on Wed Apr 30, 2008 10:19 pm

Kaplowitz wrote:
TaCktiX wrote:A great idea for a duel map, though I'd say cap out how many bonus armies for pressing into enemy territory. You could own just 5 of the enemy's bunkers and have a sizable advantage over him that would only be amplified per bunker. Perhaps some Conquerman territory adjustment idea?

Definitely continue this map, I think we need duel maps on CC, regardless if it limits its playability.


Well then protect yourself!! Or i can just change it....


how about having a neutral area and an inner neutral area/sanctum? and the neutral area between the blue and the red is all killer neutrals? with the sanctum being -2 for each territory you hold in it? that way you could get to the sanctum so that your closer to attacking the other person, but have a bad effect for u
Corporal bryguy
 
Posts: 4381
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 8:50 am
Location: Lost in a Jigsaw


Return to Melting Pot: Map Ideas

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users