How to Participate in 4th Anniversary Battle Royales

by **qwertylpc** on Sat Jan 02, 2010 7:23 pm

qwertylpc wrote:doodle
View Game 6210651 (Auto-Join Game)

read the posts above dude i just posted this

or check the twitter feed

by **darth emperor** on Sat Jan 02, 2010 7:24 pm

Battle Royale! game:Game 6210651 password:Scribble

by **qwertylpc** on Sat Jan 02, 2010 7:25 pm

darth emperor wrote:Battle Royale! game:Game 6210651 password:Scribble

i just gave that game with an autojoin option

by **karelpietertje** on Sat Jan 02, 2010 7:30 pm

Incandenza wrote:
Optimus Prime wrote:Sorry to disappoint in such spectacular fashion then.

I think you sorta missed the point: you guys disappointed in a predictable, quotidian fashion, which pretty much makes it par for the course when it comes to management. Any one of the small changes I proposed above would've enhanced the experience quite a bit. But since there's a systemic disregard for easy fixes here, I guess you guys are pumped that the same ole' doodle and classic games keep filling quickly, other considerations be damned. After all, an Arms Race BR, with starting neutrals in place, that would've been lame, no one would've liked that. Or dubs BR, no one could possibly be interested in that.

Incandenza, there is some improvement. lackattack fixed the foe list.
since there is no other occasion for this, this must have been some work!
and at least they foresee the issues that Arms Race gave this time. so there is some improvements

by **Incandenza** on Sat Jan 02, 2010 7:32 pm

Thanks KP, best laugh I've had since 44 flipped out after getting eliminated in midgard last night.

by **ben79** on Sat Jan 02, 2010 7:34 pm

karelpietertje wrote:
Incandenza wrote:
Optimus Prime wrote:Sorry to disappoint in such spectacular fashion then.

I think you sorta missed the point: you guys disappointed in a predictable, quotidian fashion, which pretty much makes it par for the course when it comes to management. Any one of the small changes I proposed above would've enhanced the experience quite a bit. But since there's a systemic disregard for easy fixes here, I guess you guys are pumped that the same ole' doodle and classic games keep filling quickly, other considerations be damned. After all, an Arms Race BR, with starting neutrals in place, that would've been lame, no one would've liked that. Or dubs BR, no one could possibly be interested in that.

Incandenza, there is some improvement. lackattack fixed the foe list.
since there is no other occasion for this, this must have been some work!
and at least they foresee the issues that Arms Race gave this time. so there is some improvements

actually karel, i think he's right

by **KingPrime** on Sat Jan 02, 2010 7:39 pm

Any games still open to join?

by **happy2seeyou** on Sat Jan 02, 2010 7:46 pm

IF a BR was made on the map "Netherlands" AND it was made DOUBLES, that would take 22 people/11 teams. I have no doubt that it could be filled in a timely manner. Let today go in the history of CC as the day someone made a TEAM effort Battle Royal.

-Milk Juggs

by **padsta** on Sat Jan 02, 2010 7:47 pm

happy2seeyou wrote:IF a BR was made on the map "Netherlands" AND it was made DOUBLES, that would take 22 people/11 teams. I have no doubt that it could be filled in a timely manner. Let today go in the history of CC as the day someone made a TEAM effort Battle Royal.

-Milk Juggs

i would join it for sure

by **Incandenza** on Sat Jan 02, 2010 7:52 pm

Indeed, that would be quite a bit of fun.

by **Gilligan** on Sat Jan 02, 2010 7:53 pm

Game 6210762

egypt

by **Gilligan** on Sat Jan 02, 2010 7:56 pm

A requested doodle

Game 6210783

doodle

by **padsta** on Sat Jan 02, 2010 7:58 pm

Gilligan wrote:A requested doodle

Game 6210783

doodle

how about a 'requested' netherlands doubles

by **slowreactor** on Sat Jan 02, 2010 8:01 pm

Game 6210799

pw=lions

by **MarVal** on Sat Jan 02, 2010 8:06 pm

padsta wrote:how about a 'requested' netherlands doubles

Double isn't allowed, but here is the Netherlands Battle Royal:

Game 6210842
pw: DutchBR

Grtz
MarVal

by **Incandenza** on Sat Jan 02, 2010 8:07 pm

MarVal wrote:
padsta wrote:how about a 'requested' netherlands doubles

Double isn't allowed

Isn't allowed, or isn't possible with the software?

by **Gilligan** on Sat Jan 02, 2010 8:08 pm

Incandenza wrote:
MarVal wrote:
padsta wrote:how about a 'requested' netherlands doubles

Double isn't allowed

Isn't allowed, or isn't possible with the software?

Isn't possible with the software.