Moderator: Community Team
kizkiz wrote:sassbot has played 9 and won 1.
I wonder who that sap was?
On a serious note, the bot was clueless. No concept of taking/breaking bonuses. Left singles everywhere and generally had no idea what it was doing
Jippd wrote:A suggestion for the clans page:
How is the order of clans currently generated on that page?
Have you considered using a random positioning every time so that each clan has an equal chance of being in the "priority viewing" area?
You also have Empire listed on the clans page
Bruceswar wrote:Clan page needs work but it is a start. .. missing some clans and some dead clans on it. . Chemefreak has an active clan list.
Jippd wrote:A suggestion for the clans page:
How is the order of clans currently generated on that page?
Have you considered using a random positioning every time so that each clan has an equal chance of being in the "priority viewing" area?
You also have Empire listed on the clans page
Bruceswar wrote:Clan page needs work but it is a start. .. missing some clans and some dead clans on it. . Chemefreak has an active clan list.
RjBeals wrote:too much outer glow in upper left logo.
Army of GOD wrote:Can we move the forum button back to the middle? =(
angola wrote:kizkiz wrote:sassbot has played 9 and won 1.
I wonder who that sap was?
On a serious note, the bot was clueless. No concept of taking/breaking bonuses. Left singles everywhere and generally had no idea what it was doing
Yep. Played just like a cook.
betiko wrote:great updates guys! this is really incredible how fast and reactive the new team is.
Ok, i think I can officially be rewardedas the first member who lost against both bots!
the level 1 bot had 3 bonuses to break on my first turn lol, and the level 2 bot just gave me areally really hard time regarding dice.
nevertheless I agree, no cook is as bad as this, even albiestar would beat them easy. (yeah i know, says the guy who lost vs the 2 bots lol)
waiting for higher ranked bots to kick some ass!
and great update with the clan page too! any way we could end up with kind of a clan score.. actually the f400 scoring in on that page?
bigWham wrote:betiko wrote:great updates guys! this is really incredible how fast and reactive the new team is.
Ok, i think I can officially be rewardedas the first member who lost against both bots!
the level 1 bot had 3 bonuses to break on my first turn lol, and the level 2 bot just gave me areally really hard time regarding dice.
nevertheless I agree, no cook is as bad as this, even albiestar would beat them easy. (yeah i know, says the guy who lost vs the 2 bots lol)
waiting for higher ranked bots to kick some ass!
and great update with the clan page too! any way we could end up with kind of a clan score.. actually the f400 scoring in on that page?
For those dreaming of a Clan Scoreboard... just hold on to your horsies!
greenoaks wrote:bigWham wrote:betiko wrote:great updates guys! this is really incredible how fast and reactive the new team is.
Ok, i think I can officially be rewardedas the first member who lost against both bots!
the level 1 bot had 3 bonuses to break on my first turn lol, and the level 2 bot just gave me areally really hard time regarding dice.
nevertheless I agree, no cook is as bad as this, even albiestar would beat them easy. (yeah i know, says the guy who lost vs the 2 bots lol)
waiting for higher ranked bots to kick some ass!
and great update with the clan page too! any way we could end up with kind of a clan score.. actually the f400 scoring in on that page?
For those dreaming of a Clan Scoreboard... just hold on to your horsies!
and what about those dreaming of a Manual medal that did not include results from games that involved no manual deployment.
dgz345 wrote:Play more games agains the bots! they are advanced CyberConquer-Bots for short CCBots and they will learn from each game and when they have the experience they will not lose anymore
Stephan Wayne wrote:Every day is Fool's Day on CC.
He is saying that now that you cannot have a manual game on maps where you only have 1 starting territory all of the previous games of that type should no longer count towards to Manual Medal.bigWham wrote:unclear message - if this is a bug, please take your predicament to the Bugs forum, where they will deal with it accordingly!greenoaks wrote:and what about those dreaming of a Manual medal that did not include results from games that involved no manual deployment.
spiesr wrote:He is saying that now that you cannot have a manual game on maps where you only have 1 starting territory all of the previous games of that type should no longer count towards to Manual Medal.bigWham wrote:unclear message - if this is a bug, please take your predicament to the Bugs forum, where they will deal with it accordingly!greenoaks wrote:and what about those dreaming of a Manual medal that did not include results from games that involved no manual deployment.
Return to Announcement Archives
Users browsing this forum: No registered users