Moderator: Community Team
Nigelus wrote:Better upgrade than some of the abusive ranting that I've seen in the past - Though, some of it is just plain hilarious...
DiM wrote:but how about the map medal and tourney medal, why don't they work?
i assume they have to be edited manually since the games can be updated automatically but the maps and tourneys can't. am i right?
Night Strike wrote:DiM wrote:To all the naysayers of this system: I wouldn't count on going back to the old system. Too many people complained about their negative feedbacks and the feedback mods were spending too much time answering their e-tickets.
lancehoch wrote:MasterGuns wrote:4) Create two Leagues: One for Premium Members and one for Non-Premium Members. (the reason I suggest this is because people who pay up for premium ussually dont break the rules as much because they have something to lose. Therefore, I can start a game for random players to join who are only premium and on average are more respectful players.) This would also be an incentive to purchase premium.
Regards,
MasterGuns[/color]
Clearly you do not go to the forums much. If you had, you would have noticed that one player was busted 4 different times last week for multis. He bought premium for both accounts on every occasion. That was over $225 in a week. Clearly some people do not care about the money.
alan.duanmu wrote:although the star system is definitely a bad idea, i think the medals add a nice flair to the site.
DukeToshiro wrote:I kind of like the idea of feedback not showing up until the game is archived as well.
lackattack wrote:Medals
Look out as well for our line of contributions medals to be awarded to those who've helped make this website a better place.
You can expect more medals to come out in future updates...
Nigelus wrote:One suggestion: You might want to consider adding an "Aptitude" or "Strategy" ranking for overall ranking - It's too easy to skew rankings high unless there's obvious Positive or Negative feedback.
Nigelus wrote:***Since I'm in the psychology field and have created "Likert-type" scales similar to these, it would be helpful to give "benchmarks" for the range of stars given (e.g., Fairness - Very hard to judge, so maybe a range from 1 star "Not fair at all", 2 stars "questionable", 3 stars "Hard to tell" or "N/A", 4 stars "fair", 5 stars "fair to a fault" or "very fair")
Fireside Poet wrote: Do these medals make me look fat?
100% agree. Every time a old thing changes, people complain for 2-3 weeks. then it is over and we get back to having fun and enjoying the better site.Coleman wrote:I'm not sure how much whining there has been for people wanting to revert back to the older, flawed, feedback system. The new one is much better and there will always be those that resist change.
I'd just like to say I picked a good time to come back, as this is a very obvious step forward for the site. Thank you for your continued diligence in providing new features and rewards for members.
Coleman wrote:I'm not sure how much whining there has been for people wanting to revert back to the older, flawed, feedback system.
Return to Announcement Archives
Users browsing this forum: No registered users