Moderator: Tournament Directors
Aerial Attack wrote:Game #624245
Tampa defeats Washington on the road
spidey wrote:you don't need to post your results on here
dussle wrote:Aerial Attack wrote:Game #624245
Tampa defeats Washington on the roadspidey wrote:you don't need to post your results on here
Aerial Attack wrote:I'm not sure that I like the Goals For/Goals Against Tie-Breaker (at least not as the first level).
What this does is give an advantage to newer players (like myself). Newer players don't have high rankings - therefore we don't give/lose large point totals in our matches.
Older players either win and barely get anything or lose large chunks of points. As for older players with low ranks, they either won't win enough earn the big point bonuses OR they are much better 1 v 1 strategists than overall players. This is fine.
I think the tie-breakers should be as follows (If at any point a team is eliminated - you take the remaining teams and start over or declare a winner):
To determine a Division Winner:
1. Head To Head
2. Division Record
3. Conference Record
NOTE: 4 Through 7 are basically equal for me, I just have slight preferences
4. Road Wins (You NEED Road Wins during the Playoffs)
5. Goals For (You won against people you "weren't supposed to" - although this rewards early season victories more, as your rank is lower then)
6. Goals Against (You didn't lose to people you "weren't supposed to" - although this penalizes early season losses more, as their ranks were lower then)
7. Home Wins (You PICKED your map - you gotta be able to defend it)
8. Coin Flip/Spidey's decision
Use the same matrix to determine Conference Seeding (except the division record thing).
I guess whichever team wins the All-Star Game determines home ice in the Stanley Cup Finals?
spidey wrote:dcc you are on the reserves list. you don't need to post your results on here and unfortunatly I couldn't restrict the tourney to only premiums, I needed to get my tourney rights first. they seem to be keeping up ok, there are some premium people who are just as slow.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users