Moderator: Tournament Directors
brandoncfi wrote:bigdaddyslim2 wrote:Well i think all the games should be played. that is the point of this tournament is to play 77 games all 8 player and if lets say i won the waterloo map even if im not in the top three that don't mean it wouldn't help me win a wild card spot. I think that all groups should play all there games, that way there is no debate when its all said and done.
and that brings up another question ? What about players that deadbeated there games, i am talking about Kotaro, he missed most of his turns so what i am asking shouldn't he be placed in last place of the games he missed 3 turns and was kicked out. That really threw off the balance of the game, becouse since he wasn't playing he wasn't getting no cards, since he had no cards people have been less likely to attack him, which allowed him to be placed higher then he should be.
I dont think that its fair since the rest of us have played our turns and been trying to win.
you make a good point, lets see how thinngs pan out
colson wrote:brandoncfi wrote:bigdaddyslim2 wrote:Well i think all the games should be played. that is the point of this tournament is to play 77 games all 8 player and if lets say i won the waterloo map even if im not in the top three that don't mean it wouldn't help me win a wild card spot. I think that all groups should play all there games, that way there is no debate when its all said and done.
and that brings up another question ? What about players that deadbeated there games, i am talking about Kotaro, he missed most of his turns so what i am asking shouldn't he be placed in last place of the games he missed 3 turns and was kicked out. That really threw off the balance of the game, becouse since he wasn't playing he wasn't getting no cards, since he had no cards people have been less likely to attack him, which allowed him to be placed higher then he should be.
I dont think that its fair since the rest of us have played our turns and been trying to win.
you make a good point, lets see how thinngs pan out
bigdaddyslim2 makes a great point. In fact, I'm not a fan of the scoring system. You pay too little points to first place. With 77 games there is plenty enough games to get a sample of who is best (unlike say if there were only 5). I recommend in the future you have it to where the most total 1st place wins out of 77 games. Bigdaddyslim2 will come in 2nd in total wins out of 77, but will not even land in the top four because of your scoring system. At least score the winner with bonus points say 10 for first and 7 for second, ect. I mean really, in an 8 player, escalating game the difference between 2nd place and 6th place may be nothing more than luck. If you happen to be placed next to a guy who goes on a run then you are going to go out earlier. Also the person going on a run to win the game can in essance choose who he wants to take out next. I bet I can win the entire tournament by doing nothing but placing my armies and ending my turn. By having no cards, I'll all but guarantee getting 2nd place in every game and having the most points. But that wouldn't be in the spirit of competition.
brandoncfi wrote:colson wrote:brandoncfi wrote:you make a good point, lets see how thinngs pan out
bigdaddyslim2 makes a great point. In fact, I'm not a fan of the scoring system. You pay too little points to first place. With 77 games there is plenty enough games to get a sample of who is best (unlike say if there were only 5). I recommend in the future you have it to where the most total 1st place wins out of 77 games. Bigdaddyslim2 will come in 2nd in total wins out of 77, but will not even land in the top four because of your scoring system. At least score the winner with bonus points say 10 for first and 7 for second, ect. I mean really, in an 8 player, escalating game the difference between 2nd place and 6th place may be nothing more than luck. If you happen to be placed next to a guy who goes on a run then you are going to go out earlier. Also the person going on a run to win the game can in essance choose who he wants to take out next. I bet I can win the entire tournament by doing nothing but placing my armies and ending my turn. By having no cards, I'll all but guarantee getting 2nd place in every game and having the most points. But that wouldn't be in the spirit of competition.
You make valid points but...
If you see somebody placing armies and not getting cards then the group needs to realize what he is doing and take him out. The reason I like this tourney is that there are multiple strategies invovled, that span the entire 77 games. Keeping yourself in a postion to be taken out 2nd to last or last is a valid strategy. However you also have to factor in your points for the game in general if you are willing to give up points and not go for the win then so be it. If you are about to win a game then it would be in your best interest to take out the people in the order you want, again that is part of the strategy of this tourney. In MP I was winning a large percentage of the 1st 40 games finnished. Other players realized what was happenning and I started to get targeted me for early elimintation. This is part of the strategy invovled. So the scoring will stay the same. In this tourney I don't care if you have won the most games I only care if you have the most points if that means 77 games coming in 2nd place that that is
fine with me.
bigdaddyslim2 wrote:Well I think that might be a good idea in the future, getting more points for the win may encourage ppl not to just sit back and try to place 2nd, but I could never not try to win. I guess thats my nature. I do understand about being able to go on a run, but its not always that way, to be able to keep up that run you need to be able to get the cards to keep it up so most likely you target the person with the most cards and brandonsfi i haven't targeted you, but i do think that with Kotaro missing most his turns it did mess up the flow of the game. I really never played esculating that much, but now that im used to it im doing allot better, I had made the mistake of trying to take bonus's early like Hath was saying, but i can say that the times i did have a bonus it gave me those few extra men that i needed to win.
I have a question. How do you make a link on the forum? Like a link to the game we played
bigdaddyslim2 wrote:Well i think all the games should be played. that is the point of this tournament is to play 77 games all 8 player and if lets say i won the waterloo map even if im not in the top three that don't mean it wouldn't help me win a wild card spot. I think that all groups should play all there games, that way there is no debate when its all said and done.
and that brings up another question ? What about players that deadbeated there games, i am talking about Kotaro, he missed most of his turns so what i am asking shouldn't he be placed in last place of the games he missed 3 turns and was kicked out. That really threw off the balance of the game, becouse since he wasn't playing he wasn't getting no cards, since he had no cards people have been less likely to attack him, which allowed him to be placed higher then he should be.
I dont think that its fair since the rest of us have played our turns and been trying to win.
Dazoot wrote:Denominator 296
Dazoot wrote:Where were these games posted and all the games won by Pogophiles Natewolfman, Acores2005 and Denominator posted??
Dazoot wrote:I was going over your tabulations for Delta Group and your scores are a little incorrect . According to the games they should be...
Pogophiles 405
Dazoot 363
Vampir2124 359
Natewolfman 343
Darin44 331
Acores2005 324
Jennifermarie 315
Denominator 296
Now I checked all the posted games on the thread to see if they were entered correctly but only the games entered by myself, Darin44, Vampir2124, and Jennifermarie were there.These were entered correctly but some of these were not entered either. Where were these games posted and all the games won by Pogophiles Natewolfman, Acores2005 and Denominator posted?? As the mistake may be in their postings.
I realize it makes no difference in the final three for the group even with one game left but it may come into play for the wild card spots perhaps.
Don't mean to be a pest but I can be a little ..okay alot anal about these things as I tend to be a great record keeper. I also have all the running scores for all the games and all the groups if you wish to compare notes.
Like I admit alot anal.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users